igf lr3 + ghrp6

  1. New Member
    wophood's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  181 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    149
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    40.29%

    igf1 lr3 + ghrp6


    How would these two be cycled best together? Or would the ghrp be better utilized after the igf cycle entirely?

    Goal - calf development, NO PERMAGUT!!!

    Current plan:

    Run igf 40 mcgs immediately Post WO EOD bi laterally.
    ghrp 200 mcgs twice (third with igf?) ED before bed & upon waking.

  2. New Member
    babyblu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    474
    Rep Power
    335
    Level
    17
    Lv. Percent
    44.82%

    I think ghrp6 AFTER igf b/c the introduction of exogenous igf might cause the body to decrease its own production of igf (i.e. thru gh). Therefore I would use the secretagogue AFTER to increase your production.

    But I defer to datBtrue's much more well founded opinions.

    bb
  3. New Member
    wophood's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  181 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    149
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    40.29%

    That's what I was wondering about. I know ghrp is mainly systemic, so it is to be injected sub q. Do you personally think there is any advantage as far as local growth that would come from IM injections?
    •   
       

  4. Senior Member
    SoCo4Fun's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"   lbs.
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,018
    Rep Power
    586
    Level
    24
    Lv. Percent
    99.22%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    GHRP-6 acts by binding to receptors on the pituitary and hypothalamus so it would have no localized effect.

    I agree with babyblu...I was considering running a cycle like you are talking about with igf-1lr3 and ghrp-6/cjc and came to the conculsion I would run the IGF first then use the ghrp-6/cjc afterwards to help the new cells from the igf grow...
  5. New Member
    wophood's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  181 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    149
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    40.29%

    Soco, have you already begun your cycle?
  6. Senior Member
    SoCo4Fun's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"   lbs.
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,018
    Rep Power
    586
    Level
    24
    Lv. Percent
    99.22%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    I started today...I'm only running GHRP-6 and CJC-1295 though...I decided to wait until next time to run IGF with it...
  7. Senior Member
    datBtrue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,173
    Rep Power
    840
    Level
    29
    Lv. Percent
    56.82%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by babyblu View Post
    I think ghrp6 AFTER igf b/c the introduction of exogenous igf might cause the body to decrease its own production of igf (i.e. thru gh). Therefore I would use the secretagogue AFTER to increase your production.

    But I defer to datBtrue's much more well founded opinions.

    bb
    Nothings really clear in the studies.

    I use to think IGF-1 would provide negative feedback and I feel it still does but perhaps that is transitory and not prolonged and that there is genuine benefit to using both.


    Here is what I KNOW (because the studies are clear). GHRP-6 only elevates IGF-1 for short (non-chronic periods). That is a reason why CJC-1295 is so good to run with GHRP-6 BECAUSE it chronically elevates IGF-1 (as does daily admininistration of synthetic GH).

    Giving GHRP-6 to GH-defecient children does not create the kind of growth they wanted because the IGF-1 levels were not chronically elevated. Still sufficient for repair but not a lot of growth.

    If I were you and I had GHRP-6 & IGF-1 LR3 around I would use the GHRP-6 3x a day including PWO and the IGF-1 LR3 once PWO.

    I think IGF-1 won't interfere with GH release much and I think it is a great way to increase the natural family of IGF-1 which will include its isoforms and further add the long-lasting IGF-1 analog on top to insure chronicly elevated IGF-1 levels.

    I have changed my thinking on this from looking at the research and listening to some real world examples of guys who used both.

    Again just one one man's opinion.
  8. New Member
    wophood's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  181 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    149
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    40.29%

    Quote Originally Posted by datBtrue View Post
    Nothings really clear in the studies.

    I use to think IGF-1 would provide negative feedback and I feel it still does but perhaps that is transitory and not prolonged and that there is genuine benefit to using both.


    Here is what I KNOW (because the studies are clear). GHRP-6 only elevates IGF-1 for short (non-chronic periods). That is a reason why CJC-1295 is so good to run with GHRP-6 BECAUSE it chronically elevates IGF-1 (as does daily admininistration of synthetic GH).

    Giving GHRP-6 to GH-defecient children does not create the kind of growth they wanted because the IGF-1 levels were not chronically elevated. Still sufficient for repair but not a lot of growth.

    If I were you and I had GHRP-6 & IGF-1 LR3 around I would use the GHRP-6 3x a day including PWO and the IGF-1 LR3 once PWO.

    I think IGF-1 won't interfere with GH release much and I think it is a great way to increase the natural family of IGF-1 which will include its isoforms and further add the long-lasting IGF-1 analog on top to insure chronicly elevated IGF-1 levels.

    I have changed my thinking on this from looking at the research and listening to some real world examples of guys who used both.

    Again just one one man's opinion.
    That's a pretty sound way of putting it Dat. Sounds like it might just be worth getting some cjc to run with the ghrp after the igf cycle completely. Good info.

    Yesterday I actually tore my pec. So most of my materials will be going towards recovering. I made a thread asking people for advice in this forum. Any words of wisdom are greatly appreciated.
  9. Senior Member
    datBtrue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,173
    Rep Power
    840
    Level
    29
    Lv. Percent
    56.82%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by wophood View Post
    That's a pretty sound way of putting it Dat. Sounds like it might just be worth getting some cjc to run with the ghrp after the igf cycle completely. Good info.

    Yesterday I actually tore my pec. So most of my materials will be going towards recovering. I made a thread asking people for advice in this forum. Any words of wisdom are greatly appreciated.
    The god of the torn pec is pumbertot.

    IGF-1 is a healing peptide...injecting as close to the injury will speed healing.

    Insulin aids in healing as well.
  10. New Member
    babyblu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    474
    Rep Power
    335
    Level
    17
    Lv. Percent
    44.82%

    I personally think GH is better for localized healing, simply b/c most igf is diluted in AA which can be destructive to all types of tissues, therefore this could IMO cause more harm than good if spot injected into or close to an injury. IF I was using igf that was stored in 100microgram vials (10 vials per 1mg) then I would dilute the igf with BW and use it for healing. But otherwise, again just my opinion, I would stick with BW-based peptide like hgh.

    bb
  11. New Member
    wophood's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  181 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    149
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    40.29%

    Quote Originally Posted by babyblu View Post
    I personally think GH is better for localized healing, simply b/c most igf is diluted in AA which can be destructive to all types of tissues, therefore this could IMO cause more harm than good if spot injected into or close to an injury.
    Through a little research, and all the info pum's given me, apparently gh isn't a bad idea. Only the idea of injecting it directly into my tendon doesn't seem too appealing. But hey, ya gotta do whacha gotta do.
  12. New Member
    babyblu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    474
    Rep Power
    335
    Level
    17
    Lv. Percent
    44.82%

    Well you dont have to inject it directly INTO tendon but into the muscle tissue surrounding the tissue.

    bb
  13. New Member
    wophood's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  181 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    149
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    40.29%

    I should have phrased that differently. I know you don't have to inject directly into the tendon, but it would be the most effective way of assisting in the healing process of the tendon itself.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. GHRP6
    By rombusempire in forum Old School Hormone Use
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 09:27 PM
  2. ghrp6
    By djbombsquad in forum IGF-1/GH
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 02-14-2009, 06:05 PM
  3. Ghrp6 whos tried it?
    By citystreets in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-09-2008, 09:57 PM
  4. GHRP6 again.
    By MentalTwitch in forum IGF-1/GH
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-29-2008, 03:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in