Ron Paul's name is continually being left out in TV, phone, and even Internet polls. When comparing Republican candidates' votes, his slice of the pie is shown, but no name is assigned to it.
Whether or not you agree or disagree with him, you have to admit that this is very unfair and unjust for whomever is doing this. This is the Presidency we're talking about, it's completely irresponsible and intolerable to censor a viable candidate.
Now the $64,000 question: who is censoring him? The Feds (Rothschilds), Democrats, Republicans, Rupert Murdoch?
Here's a blatant example of censorship:
YouTube - Ron Paul Missing from Ballot in Rockland County, NY
Apparently, polling locations are deliberately eliminating Ron Paul from the ballots and telling voters that he dropped out of the race.
Case in point: On the Road to Super Tuesday - NY Daily News
A New York State of Election Fraud for Ron Paul
It seems as though democracy is being ****ted on more and more, and we're moving further down the spiral.
Now if Ron Paul is being censored, let's look at the institutions that he threatens: IRS, big oil, defense contractors, large financial and predatory lending institutions, Republican and Democrat elite. He seems to be the only one that can potentially shake things up big in the government and hurt these organizations considering he hasn't been bought out, proven by his voting record. These institutions could lose TRILLIONS of dollars if Paul were elected to the White House.
I understand the corporate media will be biased towards the more popular candidates, but they have proven they were wrong. Giuliani was the man to beat, yet Paul had a better showing in the majority of the states than Rudy.
Maybe the major media outlets are worried that if people listen to Paul, they will realize America isn't in the best shape right now, and they don't want the American people thinking that.
It's also odd that in the debates, all of the other Republican candidates would just grin and roll their eyes at Paul, yet wouldn't have an answer to his response and not even refute what he had to say. Why? It seems as though the major media outlets want people to think RP is crazy.
Another example of voter tampering, Washington state decided to throw out Huckabee's votes because they figured he wasn't going to win.
Is this what democracy has come down to in this country?
Whether or not you agree or disagree with him, you have to admit that this is very unfair and unjust for whomever is doing this. This is the Presidency we're talking about, it's completely irresponsible and intolerable to censor a viable candidate.
Now the $64,000 question: who is censoring him? The Feds (Rothschilds), Democrats, Republicans, Rupert Murdoch?
Here's a blatant example of censorship:
YouTube - Ron Paul Missing from Ballot in Rockland County, NY
Apparently, polling locations are deliberately eliminating Ron Paul from the ballots and telling voters that he dropped out of the race.
Case in point: On the Road to Super Tuesday - NY Daily News
A New York State of Election Fraud for Ron Paul
It seems as though democracy is being ****ted on more and more, and we're moving further down the spiral.
Now if Ron Paul is being censored, let's look at the institutions that he threatens: IRS, big oil, defense contractors, large financial and predatory lending institutions, Republican and Democrat elite. He seems to be the only one that can potentially shake things up big in the government and hurt these organizations considering he hasn't been bought out, proven by his voting record. These institutions could lose TRILLIONS of dollars if Paul were elected to the White House.
I understand the corporate media will be biased towards the more popular candidates, but they have proven they were wrong. Giuliani was the man to beat, yet Paul had a better showing in the majority of the states than Rudy.
Maybe the major media outlets are worried that if people listen to Paul, they will realize America isn't in the best shape right now, and they don't want the American people thinking that.
It's also odd that in the debates, all of the other Republican candidates would just grin and roll their eyes at Paul, yet wouldn't have an answer to his response and not even refute what he had to say. Why? It seems as though the major media outlets want people to think RP is crazy.
Another example of voter tampering, Washington state decided to throw out Huckabee's votes because they figured he wasn't going to win.
Is this what democracy has come down to in this country?