US Department of Exercise?

  1. YellowJacket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    0
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    37
    Lv. Percent
    95.44%
    Achievements Activity Pro

    US Department of Exercise?


    Does America need a Department of Exercise?
    Tuesday, March 4, 2003 Posted: 6:56 PM EST (2356 GMT)


    WASHINGTON (AP) -- America's flabby population needs a federal Department of Exercise, a recreation researcher believes.

    A high-level federal agency could direct and coordinate state, local and private efforts to get people more active, said Lynn Jamieson of Indiana University.

    "We are in a crisis with a lack of controls," said Jamieson, an associate professor of recreation. "We are lacking a policy."

    America needs a physical activity equivalent of the U.S. Department of Education, because the Department of Health and Human Services isn't up to the job, Jamieson said. A spokesman for HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson disputed that.

    In at least 100 countries, a national agency funds and coordinates activities from walking trails to elite athletics, said Jamieson, who studies how communities organize athletics. America is far less centralized, leaving exercise to varied initiatives by government agencies and private volunteer groups.

    Federal statistics say about 60 percent of American adults are not regularly active, and about 25 percent are not active at all.

    Current federal initiatives have recommendations but no penalty for failure, so state and local programs are good in some areas but poor in others, Jamieson said.

    For instance, programs of the President's Council on Physical Activity and Sports are voluntary. Even the council's best-known program, the school-based President's Challenge fitness tests, must be purchased by schools, "and no one has to do it," Jamieson said.

    Initiatives by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are implemented through limited amounts of competitive grants, so programs might not get funding even if they meet the initiatives' requirements, Jamieson said.

    In contrast, countries such as Australia have a minister of sports and an organizational structure to foster physical activity, said Jamieson, who spent two years studying Australia's system.

    Tax dollars fund the Australian Sports Commission, an agency under the minister for sports. The commission encourages Australians to go out and play games, said Shirley Willis, manager of sports programs.

    "We try to hit the fun message more than the fat message," Willis said. "What we've discovered is you cannot bludgeon people into feeling guilty. You can't shame people into being active because they are fat."

    The commission provides funds for sports big and small, Willis said. Much of the commission's work is to create new customers for sports, including sports that don't get much attention, Willis said.

    For instance, the commission provided seed money for Australian football's development of a kid-sized version of the game, helps to set up athletics programs for after-school care facilities. It even has people take portable skateboard ramps into the sparsely populated rural areas that Australians call "the Bush," to show kids who have never skateboarded how it's done, Willis said.

    The commission also helps to set up in-school programs; in Australia, health and physical education must be taught in every school, Willis said.

    In Washington, a spokesman for HHS Secretary Thompson, Tony Jewell, said Thompson is directing an effort to coordinate federal health and fitness programs that historically had worked separately. Thompson is insisting that the agencies work together, Jewell said.

    As for Jamieson, "The good professor has not been paying attention to what Secretary Thompson has done in the past two years," Jewell said.

    The federal Steps to a Healthier US initiative included $25 million for community-based pilot projects in fiscal 2003, and has a $125 million proposal for the coming budget year, Jewell said.

    However, one U.S. expert doubts that a top-down approach would work in the United States.

    "That's not our model for anything," said Judy Young, executive director of the National Association for Sport and Physical Education, a physical education professional group. Many Americans would agree that people need to be more physically active but would balk at having Washington give them orders on how to do it, she said.

    What America needs is a change of individual attitudes, Young said. Even where Americans have abundant opportunities to exercise, such as walking on sidewalks or trails, they often don't use them, she said.

    America's problem is in making exercise as normal a part of life as brushing teeth, Young said. "I just came back from the Netherlands -- even on bad days, they are playing field hockey, and when it's 20 degrees, they ride their bikes," she said.

  2. New Member
    Flavor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    66
    Rep Power
    178
    Level
    7
    Lv. Percent
    67.94%

    Someone needs to convince the government to take gym membership/exercise equipment costs out of your taxes, like they do with charity.

    Oh and an organization throwing massive amounts of money at exercise research sounds beautiful... too bad it'd be run by the government...
  3. Advanced Member
    Lifeguard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Age
    30
    Posts
    601
    Rep Power
    449
    Level
    23
    Lv. Percent
    61%

    I'd gladly apply for a position (about 5 years into the future) if the government were to create a Department of Exercise.

    origianlly posted by Flavor
    Someone needs to convince the government to take gym membership/exercise equipment costs out of your taxes, like they do with charity.
    ---^ that is badass....if only it were true
    •   
       

  4. Elite Member
    Matthew D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    5,014
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    46
    Lv. Percent
    99.4%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Well don't forget you can take out some cost of getting leaned up if your doctor certifies you are severly overwieght. But you are right, we need to be able to take off the cost of a gym membership on our taxes.
  5. The Axe Man Cometh!!
    ironviking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    401
    Rep Power
    345
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    64.37%

    tax breaks and lower insurance rates would be cool

    I do agree with one part of that

    What America needs is a change of individual attitudes, Young said. Even where Americans have abundant opportunities to exercise, such as walking on sidewalks or trails, they often don't use them, she said.

    I live in Colorado - trails, parks, gyms, bike trails, running paths are abundant here - we even have an OTC out here and yet you see the same people on them and that is not a lot of people. People just are too lazy and make up too many excuses.
  6. New Member
    msclbldrguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    344
    Rep Power
    318
    Level
    20
    Lv. Percent
    56.2%

    Originally posted by Flavor
    Someone needs to convince the government to take gym membership/exercise equipment costs out of your taxes, like they do with charity.
    I agree with the idea but the problem i see is that you'd have to use the membership to get any benefit out of it. Most folks who join a gym never use their memberships....and what about folks who train at home? several members of this baord train at home and live a healthy lifestyle but dont join a gym....i just dont think itd work like it would be intended.
  7. New Member
    Flavor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    66
    Rep Power
    178
    Level
    7
    Lv. Percent
    67.94%

    That's why I included "exercise equipment".
  8. New Member
    msclbldrguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    344
    Rep Power
    318
    Level
    20
    Lv. Percent
    56.2%

    Originally posted by ironviking
    tax breaks and lower insurance rates would be cool

    I do agree with one part of that

    What America needs is a change of individual attitudes, Young said. Even where Americans have abundant opportunities to exercise, such as walking on sidewalks or trails, they often don't use them, she said.

    I live in Colorado - trails, parks, gyms, bike trails, running paths are abundant here - we even have an OTC out here and yet you see the same people on them and that is not a lot of people. People just are too lazy and make up too many excuses.
    the change of attitude...thats the heart of the problem...folks jus dont wanna take responsibility for themselves anymore...oh, well, there i go again.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-15-2009, 05:49 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-11-2009, 09:42 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-01-2009, 09:50 PM
  4. 'Any kind of exercise' helps diabetes
    By yeahright in forum Nutrition / Health
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-23-2007, 02:40 PM
  5. help me find this piece of exercise equipment
    By iwinulose2981 in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-07-2005, 08:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in