R
RyanOFelt
New member
- Awards
- 0
I am having a bit of a debate with a friend of mine. It started with him claiming that "classical music is better when working out because it keeps your heart rate lower". Although I know many people training solely for strength believe in taking long rest periods to slow down their heart rate, I still have always believed that keeping my heart rate up through super sets and shortening rest times was very beneficial, not only because of the aerobic benefits (which isn't part of our argument) but because a higher heart rate equals more blood pumped, more dilation of blood vessels, and therefore more blood delivered to skeletal muscle tissue resulting in more nutrient/oxygen uptake. He argues that the opposite is true, and that blood flow is actually what fatigues your muscles, and therefore a higher heart rate makes for an inefficient workout. I am by no means an expert on the subject, but I had always believed that more blood flow meant more nutrients to the muscle, which explains why so many bodybuilders care only about getting the biggest pump possible. Even Louis Simmons has his guys at Westside Barbell doing more HIIT type workouts now. Anyway, any information someone could shed to bring a conclusion to this discussion would be much appreciated.