![]() |
|
| | ||||
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: new orleans/ cherry point, nc Age: 26
Stats: 5'10" 203 lbs
Posts: 1,338
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | There are various calculators that use an algorithm, or what not, that you can punch your weight lifted and reps in, and it will spit out a 1RM. As you probly know, alot of things do into a 1RM lift.....force generation, tricep strength, good technique.... so i think that it's upon the individual to either go for it, or conservatively estimate their 1RM. The calculators are a good tool, but i dont think entirely accurate. http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/1rm.htm | |||
| | ||||
| | ||||
| Muscle Pharm Rep Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Buffalo, NY Age: 23
Stats: 5'10" 235 lbs
Posts: 3,606
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | I have always just equated each rep to an additional 10lbs, this has always been pretty close for the big three lifts for me. So for benching if you can do 225 for 6 then: 235 for 5 245 for 4 255 for 3 265 for 2 275 for 1 This is a real rough estimation though and it really depends on the individual, for me personally I can generate a lot of extra force for a max than I can for a set of 3-5. I think I can hit 405 3 but I can press 455 for a max. | |||
| | ||||
| | |||||
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: new orleans/ cherry point, nc Age: 26
Stats: 5'10" 203 lbs
Posts: 1,338
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
| ||||
| | |||||
| | ||||||
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: NYC Manhattan
Stats: 6'0" 220 lbs
Posts: 3,258
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
Quote:
thanks for sharing both your opinions, of course there is no perfect science some people are better at reps others are maxes | |||||
| | ||||||
| | ||||
| Muscle Pharm Rep Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Buffalo, NY Age: 23
Stats: 5'10" 235 lbs
Posts: 3,606
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Yeah I mean the only real way to know is get under the bar but even then there is going to be some discrepancy. A lot of it is going to depend on how well your nervous system is conditioned as well. Some people have the muscular potential to max a lot higher than they do, but they never put themselves under enough tension to stimulate their nervous system to be ready to generate that kind of force. | |||
| | ||||
| | ||||
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2009 Age: 23
Stats: 5'10" 212 lbs
Posts: 15
![]() | i've found thats its a J-curve your 10 rep max might equate your 1 one max ie 315 for 10 = 415 for one but your two rep max will not necessarly equate to your one rep max. that is if your adding 10lb for each rep. when you are maxing out it should be exhuasting and when your dealing with high weight a 10lb difference probably wont give you a whole other rep. | |||
| | ||||
| | ||||
| Registered User Join Date: May 2008 Location: Maine Age: 31
Stats: 5'10" 275 lbs
Posts: 454
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | The charts are a good starting point. Most inexperienced lifters will be able to do less for a max than their numbers at lower weights suggest. This is partly because of them being headcases around heavy weights, partly inexperience under a heavy bar, and partly an inability to recruit appropriate muscle fibers. Most powerlifters will do more for a max than the charts suggest. Still, for a rough rule of theumb it's not a bad way to be able to compare say 220 * 6 with 245 * 3. If you pay attention to your own abilities you should be able to make your own chart that's a lot more accurate, of course this will change along with your progress.... | |||
| | ||||
|