m-drol weaker than original Superdrol?

[mcgeier]

I heard that m-drol has got the beta isomer of the SD compound wheras the original Superdrol had the alpha isomer of the compound.
The alpha isomer should be more powerfull than the beta isomer.
Can somebody please explain?

 

[CompEdgeLabs]

M-Drol and Superdrol are the same compound. The ingredient is listed a little different on the label, but refer to the assays and you will see they are identical.

 

[mcgeier]

I thought etiocholan is the ß-isomer?

 

[crazyfool405]

I thought etiocholan is the ß-isomer?

it is,

and etioallacholan is the 5a isomer .... but i think its mislabeled.

 

[mcgeier]

it is,

and etioallacholan is the 5a isomer .... but i think its mislabeled.

Is it really mislabeled or isnt it?

 

[CompEdgeLabs]

Is it really mislabeled or isnt it?

It is not labeled the exact same as the label for superdrol was, but it is the same compound. There are more ways than one to label certain compounds.

 

[mcgeier]

The original Superdrol was labeled as:
2a,17a-Dimethyl-17B-hydroxy-5a-androstan-3-one

There are differences in the power between the ß and alpha isomer.

 

[crazyfool405]

The original Superdrol was labeled as:
2a,17a-Dimethyl-17B-hydroxy-5a-androstan-3-one

There are differences in the power between the ß and alpha isomer.

right and if you remove 5a-androst and add ETIOALLACHOLAN that will resembele the 5A isomer, but ETIOCHOLAN is 5B isomer, the problem is the labeling, not the ingredients.

its pure SD, it should not be the beta isomer, but its labeled as such, ive brought this up before with no clearance really, but i believe it to be a misprint.

 

[CompEdgeLabs]

The original Superdrol was labeled as:
2a,17a-Dimethyl-17B-hydroxy-5a-androstan-3-one

There are differences in the power between the ß and alpha isomer.

Look at the lab abalysis; it shows A isomer.

This has been addressed and not going to continue to go in circles about it.

 

[mw1]

Look at the lab abalysis; it shows A isomer.

This has been addressed and not going to continue to go in circles about it.

Been around that circle a few times myself:yawn::yawn:

 

[mcgeier]

Look at the lab abalysis; it shows A isomer.

This has been addressed and not going to continue to go in circles about it.

You mean the lab analysis on your homepage? No alpha isomer listed.

 

[CompEdgeLabs]

You mean the lab analysis on your homepage? No alpha isomer listed.

I have a feeling that at this point, you are just trying to argue, so its pointless to continue.

We have posted numerous lab assays on here in which it is shown. We labeled the product the same as SNS labeled their Methyl Drol product, which even AX confirmed was the same as superdrol. We have the raw materials tested at proviant and RTP both and they identify it as the Superdrol compound. If that is not enough proof for you, along with the hundreds of logs and reviews, then not much else left to discuss.

 

[Mulletsoldier]

It is the exact same compound, I would assume down to the raws. The original SuperDrol clone, SNS's Methyl-DrolXT was initially mislabeled with the b-isomer; however, sources confirmed that SNS's Methyl-DrolXT was of the exact same raws as Anabolic Xtreme's SuperDrol. Whether AX's SuperDrol was of the same raws as Designer Supplement's original production run is unbeknownst to me.

At any rate, that is besides the point: CEL's M-Drol is bar none the closest thing to the Methylmasteron standard you will find. No offense to the OP but, I am continually surprised that people are willing to stuff Kilosports Mega-Oxy-Bol with no reference standard into their face yet readily question a product confirmed to be the original!!