WMS, Maltodextrin, or both? - AnabolicMinds.com

WMS, Maltodextrin, or both?

  1. New Member
    CarterMalone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    143
    Rep Power
    162

    Reputation

    WMS, Maltodextrin, or both?


    Im making my own gainer shakes. Should I use WMS and Maltodextrin for the shakes, or should I just use WMS for my post workout shake, and the maltodextrin for my other two gainer shakes (morning, and before bed).

    Also is there something I can add to the shakes to slow down the absorption for the morning and night shakes? Would Inulin work for that?

  2. Elite Member
    SilentBob187's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  175 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    29
    Posts
    7,851
    Rep Power
    11113

    Reputation

    You're wanting to take a bunch of carbs before bed? I dunno if that'd be a hot idea. Either way, I think that WMS would be preferred over Malto.

    As for things that could slow absorbtion, adding something like psyllium or other bulk fiber to your shake would slow the absorbtion of protien and whatnot.
    "I am legally blind and if I can Squat,deadlift and over all get myself to the gym then anyone can get their a$$ in gear and get strong!!" - malleus25
    WHITE WHALE!
  3. Professional Member
    pmiller383's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Age
    28
    Posts
    4,005
    Rep Power
    2668

    Reputation

    For your night shake why not skip the carbs and use a fair amount of healthy fats??
    Milk Protein Isolate mixed with peanut butter makes a really thick, pudding like shake that works great before bed and will keep you anabolic for a majority of the night. If you really want carbs, try some ground up oatmeal, that has fiber in it which will help slow down absorption, and its cheaper than dirt.
    Muscle Pharm Rep
    •   
       

  4. Board Sponsor
    rpen22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,702
    Rep Power
    11092

    Reputation

    I wouldn't use Malto or WMS for a gainer. SuperCarb is a MUCH better option because, with a GI of 32, it will provide you with much slower absorbing carbs instead of completely spiking blood sugar levels. IMO, it will lead to leaner gains than the others would.
  5. New Member
    Neil5585's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    310
    Rep Power
    238

    Reputation

    Why would you choose one of the fastest carbs there is and then try to slow it down? I'd just get a slow carb to begin with....

    WMS is PWO. Diluted to a 10-12% solution, and don't mix slower absorbing things like whey in with it. It's pointless to get a very fast carb only to mix it with things that slow its absorption. Either get a highly hydrolysed protein or take the WMS 10 mins before the protein.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Nolva or Rebound XT? Or both?
    By cabby in forum Post Cycle Therapy
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-21-2006, 11:44 PM
  2. Test w/ EQ, Tren (or Both)!?
    By Steerike in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-04-2005, 07:36 AM
  3. humalog, humulinR, or both?
    By NEMO1975 in forum IGF-1/GH
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-20-2005, 10:21 PM
  4. HGH or AAS or both... Need input.
    By Poobah in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 04-19-2005, 02:39 PM
  5. Stock up on Methyls, regular PH or both??
    By fiddler in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-15-2004, 08:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in