Esterified Creatine or Regular Creatine?
- 12-26-2006, 02:37 AM
Esterified Creatine or Regular Creatine?
Iv always used just regular old Creatine and iv been happy with the results but Iv heard lately how the new Esterified Creatine Malate is suppose to be better and you dont have to load up on it, anyone have any opinions or suggestions on this? I would greatly appreciate any info or tips.
- 02-11-2007, 01:41 AM
esterified has advantages, you dont have to take as much, no loading, and it won't bloat you. But if you are looking for good old fashioned gains, monohydrate is still better, in spite of the side effects. and monohydrate is cheaper, too
02-11-2007, 07:41 PM
i didn't get the nice pump and muscle fullness from esterfied. i like the effect of regular better, but it tears my stomach up for the first week or so.
02-11-2007, 07:53 PM
02-23-2007, 12:07 AM
I would stay away from monohydrate. It is better for strength but you will def. look more puffy and soft than if you were on esterfied.
02-24-2007, 01:01 PM
Creatine Ethyl Ester all the way. The pictures form when i was on mono and later when i was on cee are night and day. sure i was heavier on mono, but the weight was soft and watery, and my muscle looked puffy or even fat. hope this helps.
02-24-2007, 03:06 PM
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
02-24-2007, 11:22 PM
Once you find the real science behind all these estered products, it'll change your attitude.. I just use patented Kre-Alkalyn, even better than CEE in my case..
02-25-2007, 11:08 AM
02-25-2007, 12:32 PM
02-25-2007, 01:06 PM
02-25-2007, 01:11 PM
02-25-2007, 10:42 PM
All the retailers out there working hard to develop new and improved prodcts, dont waste your time b/c the sinner is satisfied
02-25-2007, 10:49 PM
02-25-2007, 11:05 PM
And there's nothing wrong with having an opinion, but there is something wrong with trying to flame me for having a differing opinion.Well I get way better results off ethyl ester and this site is based off experiences and personal opinions and this is mine.
I figured I'd get called out soon enough. See the attached.hey sinner, just wondering if i could see a pic of that "pretty damn ripped physique", because like bigpete said people ideas of "ripped" are skewed, and i wanted to see how skewed yours is
02-25-2007, 11:53 PM
theres no flamage going on. you started it nanananabooboo
just making sure i wasnt taking advice from unacredited strangers.
02-26-2007, 12:03 AM
02-26-2007, 12:05 AM
02-26-2007, 12:06 AM
Sinner is right.
ALWAYS start with monohydrate. If it works - then great. Try the CEE if you want - or stay with the cheaper mono.
Mono doesn't bloat everyone, either. I didn't bloat on it.
If you don't see anything from mono - then move to an esterified/higher end version of creatine.
Ain't no need to be all yellin' up in herrrre about esterified vs. monohydrate. Can't we all just get along?
02-26-2007, 12:08 AM
02-26-2007, 12:14 AM
04-25-2007, 12:40 AM
I take both... I take esterfied pre-workout and mono postworkout in a shake with a carb post-workout...
04-25-2007, 05:43 PM
Anyone care to post some science/research behind the proven effectiveness of attaching ethyl esters??
04-25-2007, 06:09 PM
04-25-2007, 08:10 PM
04-25-2007, 08:16 PM
What is this, the 3rd thread we've addressed this "Creatine Monohydrate is the only form PROVEN effective" issue? Great minds must think alike.
04-25-2007, 08:18 PM
04-26-2007, 12:05 AM
I would like to know why anyone would think that the "ester" actually attaches when you have to, nevermind I'll wait to see if anyone can answer your question 'cause it's a good one..
04-26-2007, 09:22 AM
04-26-2007, 09:45 AM
Similar Forum Threads
- By illgixxer in forum SupplementsReplies: 13Last Post: 08-23-2009, 08:37 PM
- By yellowbus in forum SupplementsReplies: 5Last Post: 03-22-2009, 10:03 PM
- By insomniacl in forum SupplementsReplies: 9Last Post: 12-30-2008, 04:22 PM
- By screech in forum SupplementsReplies: 4Last Post: 06-21-2006, 05:51 PM
- By INFLUENCER in forum AnabolicsReplies: 9Last Post: 07-02-2003, 11:28 PM