Esterified Creatine or Regular Creatine?
-
02-25-2007 10:14 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
Fun2Train
Iv always used just regular old Creatine and iv been happy with the results but Iv heard lately how the new Esterified Creatine Malate is suppose to be better and you dont have to load up on it, anyone have any opinions or suggestions on this? I would greatly appreciate any info or tips.
He is passed the entry stage, not just starting out. He asked for advice on esterfied which we both granted him and THATS ALL FOLKS!!!!
-
04-24-2007 10:40 PM
Registered User
I take both... I take esterfied pre-workout and mono postworkout in a shake with a carb post-workout...
-
04-25-2007 03:43 PM
Registered User
Anyone care to post some science/research behind the proven effectiveness of attaching ethyl esters??
-
04-25-2007 04:09 PM
Recovering AXoholic
Originally Posted by
DaveGabe24
Anyone care to post some science/research behind the proven effectiveness of attaching ethyl esters??
Sh*t, I would PAY to see that.
-
04-25-2007 06:10 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
thesinner
Sh*t, I would PAY to see that.
Lol, we seem to be on the same page again about this whole creatine situation
-
04-25-2007 06:16 PM
Recovering AXoholic
What is this, the 3rd thread we've addressed this "Creatine Monohydrate is the only form PROVEN effective" issue? Great minds must think alike.
-
04-25-2007 06:18 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
thesinner
What is this, the 3rd thread we've addressed this "Creatine Monohydrate is the only form PROVEN effective" issue?
Yes..it's discouraging, but I do admit we make a pretty good team
-
04-25-2007 10:05 PM
Sponsor
Originally Posted by
DaveGabe24
Anyone care to post some science/research behind the proven effectiveness of attaching ethyl esters??
Considering the science behind making creatine monohydrate itself, I doubt anyone could answer this one.. 
I would like to know why anyone would think that the "ester" actually attaches when you have to, nevermind I'll wait to see if anyone can answer your question 'cause it's a good one..
-
04-26-2007 07:22 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
bigpetefox
Considering the science behind making creatine monohydrate itself, I doubt anyone could answer this one..
I would like to know why anyone would think that the "ester" actually attaches when you have to, nevermind I'll wait to see if anyone can answer your question 'cause it's a good one..
I have a feeling we'll be waiting a while for this one 
To those who advocate the use of CEE: I have noticed that most of you dose around 5g. Well doesn't that completely contradict all of these claims that you need to use smaller doses?
-
04-26-2007 07:45 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
bigpetefox
Considering the science behind making creatine monohydrate itself, I doubt anyone could answer this one..
I would like to know why anyone would think that the "ester" actually attaches when you have to, nevermind I'll wait to see if anyone can answer your question 'cause it's a good one..
Doesn't an ester *envelope* a molecule rather than attach to it?
Just a guess.
-
04-26-2007 09:37 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
ShakesAllDay
Doesn't an ester *envelope* a molecule rather than attach to it?
Just a guess.
In this situation the ester is actually attached to the creatine monohydrate, but I am uncertain if this is always the case when dealing with esters.
-
04-26-2007 12:33 PM
Sponsor
Originally Posted by
ShakesAllDay
Doesn't an ester *envelope* a molecule rather than attach to it?
Just a guess.
In CEE's case is it should just attach, but if you understand the reaction process it goes thru, it doesn't happen.. I've used CEE and liked it, but reading deeper and talking to formulators (since I plan to also have a product line) it's a flawed technology..
It works, but what's the long-term?
-
04-26-2007 12:44 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
bigpetefox
In CEE's case is it should just attach, but if you understand the reaction process it goes thru, it doesn't happen.. I've used CEE and liked it, but reading deeper and talking to formulators (since I plan to also have a product line) it's a flawed technology..
It works, but what's the long-term?
Amen.
Similar Forum Threads
-
By DGA3 in forum Supplements
Replies: 5
Last Post: 01-29-2010, 03:37 PM
-
By insomniacl in forum Supplements
Replies: 9
Last Post: 12-30-2008, 02:22 PM
-
By BoyFromAus in forum Supplements
Replies: 18
Last Post: 11-09-2008, 09:36 AM
-
By Bishop2009 in forum Supplements
Replies: 68
Last Post: 08-21-2007, 11:47 AM
-
By TheUsual in forum Supplements
Replies: 28
Last Post: 01-31-2005, 08:06 PM
Tags for this Thread