+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Am i really 24% bf?!?

  1.  03-06-2012  10:53 AM
    Registered User JajaNe20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Stats
    5'11"  222 lbs.
    Age
    25
    Posts
    645
    Reviews
    Read 1 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    138731

    Originally Posted by SXIPro View Post
    I'd guess you were in the 18-20% range
    I agree with this, but also we can't see your back or legs so it's virtually impossible to tell. You could be android body type and hold fat more on your abdominal area or a gynoid (pear shaped). Just a stomach shot would be a "guess" at best. You can also be a combination of both and hold fat evenly throughout your body which would drive the number much higher. If your really concerned; BOD POD it, I don't trust those BF scales either man too much room for error, they can be as much as 10% off



  2.  03-06-2012  11:08 AM
    Registered User Torobestia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Stats
    6'3"  250 lbs.
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    2,340
    Reviews
    Read 10 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    63129

    You're like 16 dude, at most 18. I would verify with 2 other tests (since obviously the scale you use is totally off).

    Also lol @ legs looking like a road map of kentucky.

    EDIT: I'm a total retard. I forgot about the pear phenomenon (where you hold all your fat on your lower body). But we can't tell from the pic if that's the case. Anyways, you're still not going to be 24% lol.

  3.  03-06-2012  12:01 PM
    Registered User JajaNe20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Stats
    5'11"  222 lbs.
    Age
    25
    Posts
    645
    Reviews
    Read 1 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    138731

    Originally Posted by Torobestia View Post
    You're like 16 dude, at most 18. I would verify with 2 other tests (since obviously the scale you use is totally off).

    Also lol @ legs looking like a road map of kentucky.

    EDIT: I'm a total retard. I forgot about the pear phenomenon (where you hold all your fat on your lower body). But we can't tell from the pic if that's the case. Anyways, you're still not going to be 24% lol.
    No way to justify this at all. 16% would be lucky IMHO, if his legs were seperated slightly and had low back fat

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread