36 fertile eggs = Dianabol ???
- 06-03-2009, 09:38 PM
36 fertile eggs = Dianabol ???
I was reading last night that apparently Iron Guru Vince Gironda used to say that consuming 3 cartons of fertile eggs a day will have an anabolic effect equivilent of dianabol. I don't know that it was based on. I'm looking for the link again this morning. Has anyone else read this?
- 06-04-2009, 12:19 AM
The only thing I have to say to this is don't listen to self proclaimed "gurus".
unless it's me.....
- 06-04-2009, 12:25 AM
06-04-2009, 11:55 AM
fertile eggs are supposedly very high in myostatin. 36 of them daily would obviously give you some kind of effect, though i don't know anyone who can eat more than a dozen eggs a day.
EDIT : upon rethinking this (thanks dsade), its folstaxan that fertile eggs are high in, which block myostatin.
06-04-2009, 11:57 AM
The protein, cholesterol, lecithin, and micronutrients would kickstart a ton of protein synthesis, but IDK if it's on the level of dianabol.
M.Ed. Ex Phys
06-04-2009, 12:04 PM
06-04-2009, 12:05 PM
06-04-2009, 12:12 PM
06-04-2009, 12:20 PM
06-04-2009, 12:26 PM
argh. this is what i get for typing when i first wake up. folstaxan is what i should be thinking of.
06-04-2009, 12:30 PM
06-04-2009, 12:34 PM
yes eggs have folstaxan in them which would inhibit myostatin to a certain extent. 36 eggs a day might be enough to have an effect.
06-04-2009, 12:53 PM
also dont forget arachidonic acid in the eggs too
06-06-2009, 09:43 PM
Follistaxan is a supplement made from fertilized egg powder. Follistatin is an antagonist of myostatin and has some muscle building properties of it's own.
06-06-2009, 10:10 PM
I definitely feel that DBol would be safer, cheaper, more effective, and more feasible that eating 36 eggs a day.
06-07-2009, 10:33 AM
06-07-2009, 12:31 PM
06-07-2009, 01:35 PM
i cant imagine that many eggs a day would be very good for chelosterol levels and that would be a a full day job trying to eat that many eggs f that
06-07-2009, 01:42 PM
06-07-2009, 01:58 PM
there's a thread with substandard results, though obviously the companies product might be in doubt rather than the actual compound. this IMO is one of those things that needs serious controlled studies.
i'd be curious as to if they did a study with three control groups
1 - empty pill
2 - 3 dozen regular eggs worth of cholesterol in a pill
3 - 3 dozen fertile eggs worth of cholesterol and follistatin
06-07-2009, 02:05 PM
06-07-2009, 02:50 PM
06-07-2009, 03:27 PM
06-07-2009, 03:36 PM
06-07-2009, 03:41 PM
06-07-2009, 03:42 PM
06-08-2009, 12:43 AM
cool responses everyone.
So I guess the key things are protein (obviously) but cholesterol and folstaxin (myostatin inhibitor) for the testosterone production?.. I doubt this would compare to dianabol but i'd like to see a scientific test done.
None the less, i'd have to agree that even if I could get hold of 36 fertile eggs each day for hell cheap, eating it would be a task. And if Gironda was suggesting to eat them raw (which i'm unsure of), that would be serious torture.
06-08-2009, 03:49 AM
Wow, good to know, but yeah, that would be a load to eat, especially if carried on for months as a "cycle".
By way of comparison, a strong dose of Dbol per day would cost about a buck...so I'm told...
06-08-2009, 06:06 AM
06-08-2009, 10:29 PM
The interesting thing about follistatin is that if you take mice which have a gene which under-expresses myostatin (and have about twice as much muscle as normal mice) and add a gene which over-expresses follistatin, you end up with mice with FOUR TIMES AS MUCH MUSCLE AS NORMAL.
Similar Forum Threads
- By yeahright in forum Nutrition / HealthReplies: 16Last Post: 06-14-2007, 06:00 PM
- By Steve325 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 8Last Post: 09-08-2005, 04:11 AM
- By Anxed in forum Weight LossReplies: 26Last Post: 03-11-2003, 10:28 AM