61% Jump in Testosterone??

  1. New Member
    coolbreeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    49
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    171
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    26.77%

    61% Jump in Testosterone??


    Dana - what do you think of this new agent? They claim a 61% elevation in T levels:

    "Re-SettinŽ and it's a precise combination of the carotenoid astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis and Saw Palmetto berry lipid extract from Serenoa repens. When administered to healthy adults, the average mean testosterone levels increased from a baseline level of 6,241.5 pg/mL to over 10,000 pg/mL. The human clinical study on Re-SettinŽ was published in the Journal of the International Society for Sports Nutrition."

  2. Featured Author
    dinoiii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    691
    Rep Power
    4097
    Level
    20
    Lv. Percent
    86.17%

    Good ole "Ageless Male!"

    "Re-settin" is far from new (original study published on this combo in 2008 - http://www.jissn.com/content/5/1/12) but also under a different trademark (this is merely a knock off; products suggested as "first to market" include: Muscle Tech Cryotest - http://www.nutraplanet.com/product/m...-capsules.html (although significantly underdosed compared to the study) or Axis Labs' Myodrol - http://www.nutraplanet.com/product/a...-120-caps.html (which was the first study-dose formula; but at the same time sacrificed some of the "add-ons" seen in the Muscle Tech formula) for which Axis Labs is finally putting the effort into studying their version; in other words...these agents have been sourced differently and you really need to evaluate your own sourcing; which IMO means you simply CANNOT make claims in this industry based on another prep). But, let's take a closer look at the original study because I smelled a rat as Saw Palmetto actually DECREASES androgeny (by way of 5AR Type 2) on the order of 61% (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20623347) - funny how the EXACT same 61% comes up in this story (does that mean the astaxanthin contributes nothing to the equation? Why add it at all outside of the fact that you could market a combo of astaxanthin + saw palmetto as opposed to either alone) - not exactly "usual" per se for the research world to say all 61% not converted to DHT winds up as T (there's aromatic conversion you have to take into account and subsequent reprocessing down amplification cascades into the very DHT that's being inhibited). What the hell then; how could this be - everyone's coming up with 61%?

    Let's look at the original JISSN study a bit closer...

    http://www.jissn.com/content/5/1/12/figure/F1

    http://www.jissn.com/content/5/1/12/figure/F2

    http://www.jissn.com/content/5/1/12/figure/F3

    I find this (figure 3) a condeming figure because it throws out a dose-dependency effect (again, keep in mind levels of aromatization); which again is a relative atypia based on saw palmetto monotherapy trials before it. If you take figure 3 in conjunction with figures 1 + 2; there is a serum disconnect (due to increasing T; decreasing DHT; modestly increased E but not statistically significant NOR equivocal to T and DHT numbers).

    Also - conspicuous by it's absence are BASELINE numbers. How would a study not show baseline numbers and claim significance - I can't even verify it?

    But even still, if you take their "Day 3" numbers...the men in this trial were hypogonadal. I would question applicability to those with normal serum test.

    And, to make matters worse...I have NO "Free T" (just total) which means I cannot tell a thing about viability here and what kind of reproducibility you would get if not published. Well...if SHBG increased by a profound mark, would I care at all about this "61%" increase?

    So - ultimately...I remain skeptical and whole-heartedly unconvinced! When calling the Ageless Male representatives; I got some "drone response" reciting the same nonsense over and over against my questions despite my asking some things of sincere significance (continually citing the JISSN study)...but I probably shouldn't have expected much more.


    D_
    Anabolicminds.com Featured Author
  3. New Member
    coolbreeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    49
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    171
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    26.77%

    wow, talk about thorough investigation! Props Dana, very impressive. I knew it was probably a scam, as I had read before about Saw P blocking androgen receptors.

    What gets me - how did it get published in the JISSN? Isn't that Jose Antonio and Doug Kalman's baby? I figured they would have raised some of those valid questions before allowing such trash to get published?
    •   
       

Similar Forum Threads

  1. can i jump from one to another?
    By rojasdave in forum Supplements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-23-2010, 03:51 PM
  2. someone jump on this
    By emiliozapata in forum Supplements
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-09-2010, 12:16 AM
  3. Jump Rope
    By petey7408 in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-01-2009, 05:01 PM
  4. Best jump rope
    By Korben in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-22-2008, 09:54 PM
  5. Why not to jump the gun on PHs?
    By arizonanewbie in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-17-2008, 11:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in