Bodybuilding ForumYour AmSpace Profile
AnabolicMinds.com Forum > Anti Aging > 35 and Older  
Old 02-08-2007, 11:40 AM   #1
Applied Representative
Board Sponsor
 
Lanbane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,806
Leave Comment
Reputation: 3734 Lanbane has a reputation beyond reputeLanbane has a reputation beyond reputeLanbane has a reputation beyond reputeLanbane has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 19,995, Level: 61Points: 19,995, Level: 61Points: 19,995, Level: 61
Level up: 62%, 205 Points neededLevel up: 62%, 205 Points neededLevel up: 62%, 205 Points needed
Activity: 2%Activity: 2%Activity: 2%

View Profile
Muscle-Bone Interactions Across Age in Men

An article I found of interest:
JSSM- 2006, Vol.5, Issue 1, 43 - 51

MUSCLE-BONE INTERACTIONS ACROSS AGE IN MEN



Ian J. Palmer, Eric D. Runnels, Michael G. Bemben and Debra A. Bemben


Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

Received 06 October 2005
Accepted 06 December 2005
Published 01 March 2006

Abstract:
This study examined the relationship of muscular strength and lean tissue with age-related patterns in bone mineral density (BMD) in men 20-81 years of age. Subjects were assigned to one of three age groups, Young Men (YM), (n = 25, 20-39 yrs), Middle-aged Men (MM) (n = 24, 40-59 yrs), and Older Men (OM) (n = 23, 60-81 yrs). Isotonic and isokinetic strength was assessed for the quadriceps and hamstrings muscle groups. DXA (Lunar DPX-IQ) was used to measure spine, hip, and total body BMD and body composition. OM had significantly lower (p < 0.05) total lean body mass (LBM) than MM and lower leg lean mass (LM) than YM and MM. OM had significantly lower (p < 0.01) BMD than YM and MM at the femoral neck and total hip sites and a higher proportion of OM were osteopenic and osteoporotic at the total hip site. Isotonic and isokinetic strength for both muscle groups was positively related (p < 0.05) with the hip BMD sites (r = 0.38-.67). Leg LM also was positively related to hip BMD (r = 0.37-.58). Multiple Regression analyses determined that age and lean mass (LBM or leg LM) were significant predictors (p < 0.05) of femoral neck, and total hip BMD, while lean mass (LBM or leg LM) was a significant predictor (p < 0.05) of BMD at the spine and trochanter sites. Isotonic and isokinetic leg strength variables were significant predictors (p < 0.05) of the total body, total hip and trochanter BMD. In conclusion, leg strength, leg LM, and total LBM were significant predictors of BMD in men, independent of age. These findings emphasize the importance of maintaining lean body mass for the bone health of aging men.
 



Applied Nutriceuticals Representative
www.appliednutriceuticals.com

Better Results Through Science
DRIVE + RPM............ 'Nuff Said.
Lanbane is offline  



Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 04:24 PM   #2
HMM
Registered User
 
HMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5
Leave Comment
Reputation: 43 HMM is on a distinguished road
Points: 155, Level: 3Points: 155, Level: 3Points: 155, Level: 3
Level up: 4%, 45 Points neededLevel up: 4%, 45 Points neededLevel up: 4%, 45 Points needed
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%

View Profile
Keep lifting and control your carbs

Interesting that they found Lean Mass and strength to function as a good predictor regardless of age. Lean mass is difficult to maintain without weights.
 
HMM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright
2002 - 2008 Anabolicminds.com