we all may be screwed

[Matt T]

i hope this does not pass:

http://msn.espn.go.com/gen/news/2002/1009/1443414.html

 

[curt2go]

Huh. That would suck . then I could not import them to Canada... waaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaa.. Talk to ya

 

[dg806]

The steriod bill already law allows for such if naturally occuring. How will they negate this??

 

[Lifeguard]

"...but that taking the stuff can lead to adverse reactions, especially in children."

Yeah, no ****. Thats why the bottle says "keep out of reach of children."

Man, these people piss me off

 

[windwords7]

As promised, here is the full text of the bill that we are all dreading. WW7
============================================

H. R. 5564

To amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the placing of certain substances on the schedules of controlled substances, and for other purposes.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 2002
Mr. SWEENEY (for himself and Mr. OSBORNE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary and Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A BILL
To amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the placing of certain substances on the schedules of controlled substances, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SCHEDULING OF CERTAIN SUBSTANCES.

(a) DEFINITION- Section 102(23) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(23)) is amended--

(1) by striking `(A)' and inserting `(B)(i)';

(2) by striking `(B)' and inserting `(ii);

(3) by striking `(C)' and inserting `(iii); and

(4) by inserting after `means a substance--' the following new subparagraph:

`(A) which the Attorney General has found to be, and by regulation designated as being, the immediate chemical precursor of an anabolic steroid that has been scheduled as a controlled substance (hereinafter in this subparagraph referred to as `scheduled anabolic steroid') which either is a metabolite of a scheduled anabolic steroid or is transformed in the body directly into a scheduled anabolic steroid or the metabolite of a scheduled anabolic steroid; or'.

(b) PLACEMENT ON SCHEDULE- Section 201(e) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811(e)) is amended--

(1) by inserting `or for the immediate precursor of a scheduled anabolic steroid, without regard to the requirements of section 102(41), including the requirement that the substance promote muscle growth' after `section 202(b)'; and

(2) by adding at the end the following: `However, once an immediate precursor described in section 102(23)(A) is placed in a schedule pursuant to this section, it becomes a controlled substance and the Attorney General may schedule an immediate precursor of that substance in accordance with this section.

SEC. 2. AT-RISK EDUCATION PROGRAMS FOR GRADE AND HIGH SCHOOL TEENAGERS.

(a) IN GENERAL- The Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (hereinafter in this section referred to as the `Director') is authorized to undertake education programs at the grade and high school levels to highlight the harmful effects of steroids and steroid precursor use by youths.

(b) TARGET REQUIREMENTS- The Director shall, to the maximum extent feasible, use amounts made available to carry out subsection (a) for existing State and local antidrug programs. Furthermore, funds made available for this purpose shall be used primarily on education programs that will directly communicate with teachers, principals, coaches, as well as grade and high school children at the school level on the harmful effects of steroids and steroid precursors.

(c) AUTHORIZATION- There is authorized to be appropriated for programs under section 2(a) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2003, $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2004, and $17,500,000 for fiscal year 2005. [/B]

 

[Matt T]

(c) AUTHORIZATION- There is authorized to be appropriated for programs under section 2(a) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2003, $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2004, and $17,500,000 for fiscal year 2005. [/B]

sounds like this will cost massive amounts of money, both in lost retail and the subsequent educational programs. ridiculous.

:gore:

i love the new smilies!!!