If you're not a sock puppet then read this

FalseProphet

New member
Awards
0
[font=verdana, arial, helvetica]America is on the fast-track to dehuminization of every citizen. It's important to keep an eye on the sickness that dwells within in the veins of our own nation. To this end, here is a list of the most frightening, arrogant, inhuman, people:

Dennis Miller: Once upon a time Dennis Miller was a great funnyman, but in the latter half of the nineties he made a barely noticebale descent into the bowels of conservatism, which was brought to an ugly, pus-filled head by the September 11th attacks. Having recast himself as Bush's own personal Monica Lewinsky, he seems to have undergone an operation to have his political sophistication removed. It's always sad when someone we once admired reveals himself to be a xenophobic buffoon, but not so sad that he shouldn't be stifled with his own viscera. Miller's switch to the right may have made him feel safe, but it turned his once impressive career into a bag of infectious waste. After his last unremarkable HBO special , Dennis will be lucky to get a role in a car wax commerical.

Michael Jackson(aka- Cyborg Doppleganger): Maybe he didn't have a real childhood and maybe he didn't play happy-pants with cancer-riddled children, but at some point this national sideshow should have gotten the message to stay away from the kids. America should not give him a pass just because of ''Billie Jean'' . If a gander at Jackson's physical apperance is not evidence enough of deep rooted psychological problems, then what the hell is? If Jackson ever does go to prison, we hope he is accompanied by every parent who pimped out their child to him over the years.


Laura Bush: A remarkable technological achievement by any standards. The vacuous eyes, meaningless smile, corkboard personality, and complete incapacity for empathy make Laura Bush the ultimate Stepford Wife. Why marry a real woman when you can manufacture one in a laboratory? She stays hidden away in the recesses of the White House until they prop her up for a commercial spot or meticulously scripted interview. Department store mannequins have more charisma than the First Lady. Women's liberation can just stay in the kitchen and bake some of those delicious Tollhouse cookies, thanks to Mrs. Bush.

Arnold Schwarzenegger: Ok, yes, he has done so much to promote a fitter, healthier America, but he should have stuck to the bodybuilding and acting. He is now the American Dream gone bad. If Hercules Goes Bananas is a stepping-stone to a political career then we had better keep an eye on Pauly Shore. Watching Arnold being sworn in as Governor of California was like watching the ''Caveman Lawyer'' skit from SNL without the laughs. Democrats can play this game, too-if they really want the presidency this time, they should nominate Harrison Ford.

Paris Hilton: Will someone please put this bitch in a round room and tell her to sit in the corner? Anything to her off a televison. Just looking into the face of Ms. Hilton provides a perfect argument as to why the upper class needs to be sterilized. All the money in the world, and still this useless waste of flesh wants to be on televison to the masses can marvel in her vacuum of intelligence. In fact, most people with her level of brain activity require a respirator to stay alive. If Paris Hilton were not an heiress, she would still be on television; only on the Weather Channel, describing what it was like to her see trailer sucked up by the big tornado.

Colin Powell: Dude, where's my dignity? Once thought to the first African American with a shot at the Presidency, Powell exluded an air of honest integrity; now he might as well be carrying lunch trays at a country club. Working for Bush has a way of destroying a man's soul, and Powell lost his at the UN, where he knowingly lied through his teeth, presenting phony evidence of Saddam's WMD's. Dance, General, dance!!

Rupert Murdoch: That's right, the Aussie outcast is now an American citizen. Only someone as vile as Murdoch would use the '' The 700 Club'' as a template for an entire news template. Seizing the oppurtunity to be a fixer for his ultra-rich pals hammpered by the pesky facts in their quest to dominate the world. Rupert created a 24/7 ''world affairs for dummies'' channel. Predictabily, Fox news rapidly became the ratings leader, scoring particulary well with the lucrative 'dipshit' demographic. I sometimes watch this atrocious propaganda orgy for inspiration, but advise non-satirists against it, as long-term exposure can lead to mental degeneration and an irrational fear of information.

Strom Thurmond: Makes the list for taking so long to die, and because he was so senile and decrepit at the time of his death that he probably suffer nearly enough. Then again, no amount of suffering would have been enough for the miserable son of a bitch.

Dick Cheney: There is evil and there is Dick Cheney, part man, part machine and ugly to the bone. How the hell did this sneering time bomb, devoid all charisma, get to be Vice President anyway? I mean, we know he's the evil Halliburton crony, who won't reveal his backroom associations from the ''the energy task force'', but shouldn't he be more behind the scenes? I'd like to see Dick's pacemaker do to him what a loose heat tile did to the space shuttle.

Anna Nicole Smith: This hyper-inflated, empty-headed hippo's fifteen minutes ran out a long time ago. I can't believe that anyone would waste their lives watching this witless corpse-lover and her pathetic, spiritless hangers-on sit around and stare at each other with their hollow, free-ride seeking eyes, trying to fill their carvernous need-holes with giant furniture, giant food and giant valiums. At least the Osbournes are funny. Even though Anna Nilcole would be better put to use as an ottoman, her show is more honest than Fox News.

Kobe Bryant: His uterly convincing denial of the famous charges against him make him the least likely sports figure to cross over into the acting since Marge Schott. Call it athletic impunity or OJ syndrome, but it seems the only way a black man can get the benefit of the doubt in America is if he has a killer jump shot or a Heisman trophy.

Rush Limbaugh: Just looking at this vile pig makes you want to puke in your soup. It is depressing that his impressive use of narcotics was wasted on such a dick. Then to have it exposed before Rush had a chance to OD! Tragic. Rush has made his fortune serving as a filthy lying mouthpiece for the Conservative agenda, and taking advantage of the ignorant by filling them with as many lies and half-truths as have ever been uttered by one meatloaf. Even with his hypocrisy exposed in full glorious Technicolor, he is still defended by those who can barely afford to put food on their table.

Tony Blair: Techinically not an American, but he is our bitch. It's not just that he is willing to be America's bitch; it's that he likes it so much so that he is willing to completely ruin his political career acting as an unofficial mouthpiece for the Bush administration. There are actually days when he forgets to wipe George Bush's essence from his chin before giving a speech. In the good old days of the monarchy, people like Blair were drawn and quartered, their severed heads stuck on a pole on London Bridge as a message to all traitors. In today's world he will probably be made a CEO of the next Enron corporation.

Pat Roberston: As you read this, there is a new wing being constructed in the lowest pits of hell dedicated to Pat Robertson. This guy throws God around a zoo monkey throws its feces. He was recently quoted as saying the ''Lord'' had informed him that Bush would win his re-election. His TV show, ''The 700 Club", makes one wish there is a God, just so he can let Malcolm X pimp Robertson's ass out to Oscar Wilde before sending Pat to hell.

Ann Coulter: The undisputed queen of right-wing groupies deserves another turn. If Ann Coulter had been around for the Third Reich Ice-Cream Social, Eva Braun wouldn't have stood a chance. Every time this woman opens her mouth, hordes of winged demons fly out and rip flesh from unsuspecting public school children. Only a paranoid fascist accuses more than half a nation of treason. It's rumored that the film "The Ring'' is actually a biopic of her childhood.

Finally........... the man himself

G.W. Bush: if Joseph Stalin were alivem he could certainly stand back in awe at the maze of propaganda that is generated by Dubbya and his cronies. Bush isn't simply the dumbest President in the United States history but also the most dangerous. The next time you are renting videos, give the original ''Dead Zone'' a watch; just replace Martin Sheen with G.W. Bush. A better comparison would be hard to find.
[/font]
 

size

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Great first post. :(

When you doubt yourself, it is easier to make fun of others. Majoirty of what you wrote simply makes you look like a "sock puppet" on the opposite end.
 

Matthew D

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Interesting first post.. some of it has merit.. :D
 

goldylight

***** Vampire
Awards
1
  • Established
Wow - i just wasted a few minutes of my life reading this BS.
 
Sir Foxx

Sir Foxx

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
The celebrities aside, you are obviously a liberal. Sure, there are some points made, but just as many can made and with more facts behind them about your side. I lean right, but consider myself libertarian. I don't agree with a lot that Bush is doing inside this country, but I think he is doing just fine on the outside. Who's the alternative to him? Kerry? He scares me because he has no backbone.

The comparsion of Bush to Stalin, wtf?
 

MaddCapp

New member
Awards
0
Merriam-Webster:

FALSE: Not genuine; intentionally untrue; inaccurate in pitch; based on mistaken ideas; inconsistent with the facts
PROPHET:an effective or leading spokesman for a cause, doctrine, or group

Yep.
 

VanillaGorilla

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
The celebrities aside, you are obviously a liberal.
They don't use liberal any more because every knows what they stand for. They have changed the name from liberal to "progressive". Many people don't know this but before liberal they we called socialists.
I might agree on your stance on celebrities but
Women's liberation can just stay in the kitchen and bake some of those delicious Tollhouse cookies
You are right!!!!!!! No one in their right mind would want to stay home and actually bring up their own children. What a ridiculous concept that is. Everyone knows children are much better off being shipped off to day care and being brought up by strangers. Children really only need to see their parents for an hour a day, anything after that is just over kill. Nothing is more shallow and meaningless than being a parent.....hell that's what MTV is for now. Women can not be happy and are really being oppressed by evil rich white guys unless she has a career............. and is a socialist........whoops I mean liberal........sorry I meant progressive.
 

jweave23

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
They don't use liberal any more because every knows what they stand for. They have changed the name from liberal to "progressive". Many people don't know this but before liberal they we called socialists.
Not all of us like to use that terminology, but thanks for the generalization. I cannot stress enough how the word "liberal" has been maligned and vilified by the right. The word "conservative" still remains without too much stigma, I think mainly because of the lack of a national Democratic voice (hence AirAmerica as one way to fight back). The connection between liberals and socialists is exaggerated here. Elements of socialism exist in many parties (look at the money Congress spends, talk about socialism) ;)
 

VanillaGorilla

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
I cannot stress enough how the word "liberal" has been maligned and vilified by the right. The word "conservative" still remains without too much stigma, I think mainly because of the lack of a national Democratic voice (hence AirAmerica as one way to fight back).
Lack of a national democratic voice? What about the New York Times, Boston Globe, CNN, ABC, CBS, .......it's easier to put it this way, the only "conservative" TV is FOX news, MS NBC has one show Scarborough country, and CNBC has Dennis Miller which really isn't a "news show". As for papers, there are really only two the Wall Street Journal and the Washington times. On the flip side most of the successful talk radio shows are conservative. Some have argued that conservative talk radio has been so successful because of mainstream media is so biased toward the left. Liberals have the tax payer funded NPR and I believe Al Frankin just started a radio show. I think they probably should have picked someone else. Al isn't the most stable person in the world and he isn't very articulate or good at debating. My guess is that liberal radio won't do too well but I could be wrong.
I don't think that the word liberal has been "maligned" by the right. People understand that liberal's today generally stand for bureaucrats who want higher taxes, more government, and social programs that waste peoples money with red tape and don't work. This is why they changed the name to progressive. They did the same thing with welfare. It was first called relief designed to help people who were out of work. Then they changed it to welfare and now that most people have a negative association with that word it is now called entitlements.
Conservatives do have some stigma with it. Conservatives are painted as dumb, religious, and mean.
The definition of socialism is taking peoples money and redistributing it. With 40 to 50 % of taxes taken out of each weeks pay check I think the definition of socialism fit for democrats and republicans. I think the difference today is democrats want government to grow by 100 % and republican want it to grow by 80%. Some one put it as democrats are socialist are republicans are socialist - light.
 

jweave23

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
Lack of a national democratic voice? What about the New York Times, Boston Globe, CNN, ABC, CBS, .......it's easier to put it this way, the only "conservative" TV is FOX news, MS NBC has one show Scarborough country, and CNBC has Dennis Miller which really isn't a "news show". As for papers, there are really only two the Wall Street Journal and the Washington times. On the flip side most of the successful talk radio shows are conservative. Some have argued that conservative talk radio has been so successful because of mainstream media is so biased toward the left. Liberals have the tax payer funded NPR and I believe Al Frankin just started a radio show. I think they probably should have picked someone else. Al isn't the most stable person in the world and he isn't very articulate or good at debating. My guess is that liberal radio won't do too well but I could be wrong.
I don't think that the word liberal has been "maligned" by the right. People understand that liberal's today generally stand for bureaucrats who want higher taxes, more government, and social programs that waste peoples money with red tape and don't work. This is why they changed the name to progressive. They did the same thing with welfare. It was first called relief designed to help people who were out of work. Then they changed it to welfare and now that most people have a negative association with that word it is now called entitlements.
Conservatives do have some stigma with it. Conservatives are painted as dumb, religious, and mean.
The definition of socialism is taking peoples money and redistributing it. With 40 to 50 % of taxes taken out of each weeks pay check I think the definition of socialism fit for democrats and republicans. I think the difference today is democrats want government to grow by 100 % and republican want it to grow by 80%. Some one put it as democrats are socialist are republicans are socialist - light.
1. as you pointed out, conservatives have the natinal radio by leaps and bounds

2. I hope Franken does well, as there is no other liberal voice on the airwaves, and he's funny as hell :D

3. "I don't think that the word liberal has been "maligned" by the right. People understand that liberal's today generally stand for bureaucrats who want higher taxes, more government, and social programs that waste peoples money with red tape and don't work. This is why they changed the name to progressive."

This is the most ridiculous statement I've read from you yet regarding liberals. You seem to imply that general public has just accepted this, your definition of what a liberal is. As if it's "just common knowledge" that liberals are ridiculous and laughable in the way they spend money and wish to increase government. I ask you to look at who's wasting money now, the current administration is spending it like it's going out of style. As for "big government".....this may be a stretch to some but let's just remember who's currently involved in legislating homosexual activity (marriages), abortion, first amendmant free speech (FCC), supplements and steroids, etc. A truly "small government" would not be so invasive to the citizens and attempt to federally regulate everything in sight, so let's not say the liberals are always the culprit here.
 

VanillaGorilla

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
This is the most ridiculous statement I've read from you yet regarding liberals. You seem to imply that general public has just accepted this, your definition of what a liberal is. As if it's "just common knowledge" that liberals are ridiculous and laughable in the way they spend money and wish to increase government.
OK if it's ridiculous than name a program that is on current liberal platform that won't raise taxes, increase government, or is a social program (which usually does both). Sen. Zell Miller has been saying that the democratic party is drifting too far to the left for many months as well.
I ask you to look at who's wasting money now, the current administration
I acknowledged in my last post that republicans are almost as bad and in some cases are just as bad as democrats. Many people let their political ideology blind them. I do not.
let's just remember who's currently involved in legislating homosexual activity (marriages), abortion, first amendment free speech (FCC), supplements and steroids, etc.
Allowing gay marriage is also legislating homosexual activity and I have said much more on this in the other thread about this.
Abortion imo is a non issue that is simply a scare tactic used by the left.There was a republican in the white house from 1980 to 92 and abortions are still legal. Partial birth abortions I think most people have a different opinion about and don't support unless the mothers life is endanger or there is something terribly wrong with the baby. It is also another word that the left plays semantics with trying to change it to late term instead of partial birth.
How is the current administration trying to limit free speech? The FCC thing is more of a way for media conglomerates to get even bigger which isn't good and both sides are guilty of that. Even if they are you have to admit the left does this as well. They have a label for any one who disagrees with them. They could be a racist, homophobic, hetrocentrist, dumb, xenophobic, ignorant, intolerant, rich, white, male, religious, or just using hate speech and sometimes they just scream over the person they are debating.
We all ready went over the supplements and steroids thing. The same thing would be going on regardless of who was in office. Bidden is a dem.
A truly "small government" would not be so invasive to the citizens and attempt to federally regulate everything in sight, so let's not say the liberals are always the culprit here.
I did not say that liberals are always the culprit as I stated in an earlier post. I believe in a small government and I don't really see either side moving in this direction.That being said the platform that the democrats are running on besides I hate bush is basically a socialist agenda. The republicans that run pretend they are conservatives then don't act like they are. Even if they do cut taxes they don't have the balls to cut spending so the deficits increases.
I hope Franken does well, as there is no other liberal voice on the airwaves, and he's funny as hell
Do you seriously think he is funny? I honestly don't. I think the daily show is funny and they have a pretty large liberal slant. Frankin can't debate he just acts like he ate allot of paint chips when he was a kid. Did you seem him and Bill O'r debate? It was pretty bad. O'R was bad because he is pretty thin skinned and got mad pretty easily. Bill managed to bring up a point that Frankin often criticizing him for making mistakes but can only give one example of him saying that a news show he was on won a Peabody and it turned out to be a different award. All Al did bring that mistake up over and over again and look like he just got a lobotomy. I think the democrats could come up with someone better than him. If Frankin fails they always have NPR and it's tax payer subsided so they don't have to worry about ratings. They will always have Tom, Peter, the other guy, Barbara, and most major news papers in the country.
 

Similar threads


Top