Lakevillethor
Member
- Awards
- 0
Gentlemen,
I got back from mexico (honeymoon) weighing about 175 --- which means I lost about 8 pounds over the course of a week in Puerto Vallarta --- a lack of food, a lot of cardio , etc made this possible. Anyway, I wondered what would happen if I was to use PHs/AAS at this light of a weight. Since my body is going to rebound anyway, putting on a lot of lean tissue at this light of a weight, I thought that the gear would help this, making the gains ever leaner. It's like taking one step back(losing the weight), then taking 5 steps forward when you add the gas with the additional food that I lacked in mexico. Here's the theory I pondered:
As many of you know, after you finish dieting, you bounce back by putting on the leanest muscle at this stage of your bulking. You start adding more bodyfat after you have gotten back to the setpoint that you were at previously. For me, this means that I would gain back the leanest amount of muscle (and least amount of fat) from 175 until I got back to about 183 which is approximately my setpoint. However, when you add the gas in there, you will be even leaner at 183 (aside from that, the gear will help me go well beyond that natural threshold of 183) then if you did not use it.
Many will say that this is a waste of gear as you're going to gain the weight back anyway. I say it isn't because you can get back to that weight so much leaner than if you did not use it. For me, it's all about quality mass. SO, if you're looking for the leanest mass, I think this type of cycle may have some use.
I would like to hear others comments on this:
I got back from mexico (honeymoon) weighing about 175 --- which means I lost about 8 pounds over the course of a week in Puerto Vallarta --- a lack of food, a lot of cardio , etc made this possible. Anyway, I wondered what would happen if I was to use PHs/AAS at this light of a weight. Since my body is going to rebound anyway, putting on a lot of lean tissue at this light of a weight, I thought that the gear would help this, making the gains ever leaner. It's like taking one step back(losing the weight), then taking 5 steps forward when you add the gas with the additional food that I lacked in mexico. Here's the theory I pondered:
As many of you know, after you finish dieting, you bounce back by putting on the leanest muscle at this stage of your bulking. You start adding more bodyfat after you have gotten back to the setpoint that you were at previously. For me, this means that I would gain back the leanest amount of muscle (and least amount of fat) from 175 until I got back to about 183 which is approximately my setpoint. However, when you add the gas in there, you will be even leaner at 183 (aside from that, the gear will help me go well beyond that natural threshold of 183) then if you did not use it.
Many will say that this is a waste of gear as you're going to gain the weight back anyway. I say it isn't because you can get back to that weight so much leaner than if you did not use it. For me, it's all about quality mass. SO, if you're looking for the leanest mass, I think this type of cycle may have some use.
I would like to hear others comments on this: