Donald Trump running for president

ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
George Satan Bush:

The man who grounded his own father on 9/11 and flew Bin Ladens family out of Washington DC to overseas before the FBI had a chance to interrogate them all on the same night.

Now that was impressive.
 
puccah8808

puccah8808

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Bush is a living Satan, and now CiaNN is propping him up even promoting his father.

Bush was just linking the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and linking them to January 6th the other day, Come on man!
I saw this. Fcuking gross!!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ax1
BamBam54

BamBam54

Active member
Awards
3
  • First Up Vote
  • Established
  • RockStar
Ondo
Im still working through this, not sure where the title of "destroyed" earned its merit...it does come out different when you start reading the transcript instead being fed the emotion of tone in the video as Greg does look better (camera angles, lighting, etc..) on video (think JFK vs Nixon debate video vs, audio) and it was designed as such and he is clearly prepared on the offensive prior to the interview with written stats and notes that would have been impossible for her to prepare for and make her look weaker.

Also, Id be careful with Dr. Greg, smart as hell but he is affiliated with the NSA (has had some of his research funded by them,) one of the least trusted organizations when it comes to anything 9/11 so he has as much biased interest to be a debunker and Judy has supporting the truth movement.

Im halfway through the video and working back and forth with the transcript, its really entertaining.

Im not saying Dr. Judy is absolutely right with her theories but Im not convinced we reached flat earth level material, not based off this video claiming he "destroyed her," not at all.
I didn't name the video, but you can see Judy flailing around wacky theories and hypothetical musings as if fact... and Greg is giving a reasoned scientific response in rebuttal.

For example - Judy saying how paper didn't get burned like microwave weapons, or a microwave oven. And Greg saying it's simply because paper doesn't contain water upon which microwave reacts.

See? You can take an ordinary scientific phenomenon and a kook can use this to claim an invisible space death ray. Don't be a kook.

But the youtube exchange was just a taste. The complete thorough response, with footnotes etc, is in Jenkins full paper (I provided the link earlier)

The shortest response is that yeah, we may have limited particle beam weapons. But figure the energy it takes to destroy 1 brick, and then you quickly see it is 100% totally ridiculous to ever suggest anyone could "dustify" 80% of the two tallest buildings in the world.

And then when you realize Judy came up with this dopey theory by comparing to the short hollow Kingdome stadium (for mass, ground impact, etc) and some aerial photos of rubble.... the whole thing becomes a laughable joke of Bigfoot science. And anyone who repeats it is gullible and/or moronic.

PS - you posted a bunch, but nothing at all about your educational background to perhaps understand your reading and reasoning ability??
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
My final 9/11 rant of the night and I have other homework to do. Been on 9/11 ranting mode this past week and this is the place I go to so dont mind me.

Hmmm...I wondering what the Pentagon had for dinner the night they had their trained agents over for some happy times while the FBI was investigating him and called him " as a valuable liaison to the Muslim community and a potential investigative source???" LMFAO who keeps falling for this crap?

Oh, ok, so he wasnt "radicalized" until a few years later when he became a core Al-CiaDa cult leader, hmmmmm...but he was several of the hijackers spiritual leader, nothing to see here folks he g2g no need to tell the Pentagon what they probably already know as after all they created Al-CiaDa with the creation of the Mujahideen (“those engaged in jihad”) in the late 70s, funding Bin-laden in the 80s and so on.....But it was Saddam Huussseeeinnnnnn!!!! NIce job George Satan Bush, lets keep funding the Saudi's gggrrrrrrr......is that what you meant by "I make decisions here with war on my mind, I am a war president" hmmm.....

Qaeda-Linked Imam Dined at Pentagon after 9/11

October 21, 2010 / 9:26 AM / CBS

Anwar al-Awlaki - the radical spiritual leader linked to several 9/11 attackers, the Fort Hood shooting, and the attempted Christmas Day bombing of an airliner - was a guest at the Pentagon in the months after 9/11, a Pentagon official confirmed to CBS News.

Awlaki was invited as "...part of an informal outreach program" in which officials sought contact "...with leading members of the Muslim community," the official said. At that time, Awlaki was widely viewed as a "moderate" imam at a mosque in Northern Virginia.

At the same time, the FBI was also interviewing Awlaki about his contacts with three of the 9/11 attackers - Nawaf al-Hazmi, Khalid al Midhar and Hani Hanjour - who were all part of the crew of five that hijacked the American Airlines jet that hit the Pentagon.

In the days after 9/11, Awlaki told FBI officials he remembered meeting al Hazmi but recalled little else about him. It is believed Awlaki met both al Hazmi and al Midhar in 2000 when Awlaki was the imam at a mosque in San Diego. Awlaki later moved to Northern Virginia and al Hazmi was seen at the Virginia mosque as well. However, there are scant details about Awlaki's actual contacts with al Midhar and Hani Hanjour.

In 2001, the FBI did not share this investigative information with the Pentagon, but officials say there was no reason to - Awlaki was not a suspect and was not believed to be connected to the 9/11 attacks. Instead he was viewed as a valuable liaison to the Muslim community and a potential investigative source. As one official put it, "he was a much different guy back then."

Still, it's not clear what kind of vetting or background check was done by the Defense Department before Awlaki was allowed into the building.

In the nine years since the meeting, Awlaki has become increasingly radicalized and is part of the core leadership of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. His radical preachings helped to inspire alleged Fort Hood gunman Major Nidal Hasan and officials say Awlaki took a direct operational role in the failed Christmas Day attack on Northwest Airlines flight 253. Awlak, who was born in the United States, has now been targeted by the government - he's currently on the CIA's list of terrorists to be killed or captured.

The FBI only learned of Awlaki's Pentagon luncheon during the investigation into the November 2009 Fort Hood shootings. A Defense Department employee recognized the cleric's picture and reported the 2001 meeting to the FBI.

News of al-Awlaki's presence at the Pentagon event was first reported by Fox News.

 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Ondo

I didn't name the video, but you can see Judy flailing around wacky theories and hypothetical musings as if fact... and Greg is giving a reasoned scientific response in rebuttal.

For example - Judy saying how paper didn't get burned like microwave weapons, or a microwave oven. And Greg saying it's simply because paper doesn't contain water upon which microwave reacts.

See? You can take an ordinary scientific phenomenon and a kook can use this to claim an invisible space death ray. Don't be a kook.

But the youtube exchange was just a taste. The complete thorough response, with footnotes etc, is in Jenkins full paper (I provided the link earlier)

The shortest response is that yeah, we may have limited particle beam weapons. But figure the energy it takes to destroy 1 brick, and then you quickly see it is 100% totally ridiculous to ever suggest anyone could "dustify" 80% of the two tallest buildings in the world.

And then when you realize Judy came up with this dopey theory by comparing to the short hollow Kingdome stadium (for mass, ground impact, etc) and some aerial photos of rubble.... the whole thing becomes a laughable joke of Bigfoot science. And anyone who repeats it is gullible and/or moronic.

PS - you posted a bunch, but nothing at all about your educational background to perhaps understand your reading and reasoning ability??
I was looking at some of the paper earlier Im multitasking alot, I mean we dont know what type of weaponry exists in black ops so as far as Im concerned measuring what is not known and only from the perspective of what is known can only be taken from a grain of salt. We dont know what we are really dealing with for sure, and Judy made that clear, its more about the crime scene first and you have to figure out the cause later, but you know somethings dont add up. Thats what an investigation entails.

I personally think if they used any type of higher tech that it was in combination of a weakened state with the plane crash of course, the explosives that clearly blasted as the towers collapses (the projectile fireballs were clearly seen some stories below the collapse point on the way down,) nano thermite...which are things we can prove more so than invisible tech, but if the tech was used it was used as an aid to the catastrophe. I dunno thats what I already speculated before I ever even heard of Judy Wood but I was aware of high end black ops futuristic tech years before that.

I dont think this is an issue of me being an idiot or educational background, I do have a college degree and I’m fine forming my own judgment and opinions, but this is more rather your not as open minded as alot of people Ive come across in the real world here, but I dont mean that in a derogatory way I was there once too.
 
Last edited:
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
I saw this. Fcuking gross!!!!!
Im not with those people nor do I condone breaking into that building in the first place, but Im personally offended as an American the constant link of Dump supporters with "terrorism" and "extremism" when the overwhelming majority of people there including those that broke in were good kind people, and perhaps a bunch made a mistake and got caught up in the moment of human psychology. And none of this would have happened if they listened to people calling for more secure elections for decades.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
I was looking at some of the paper earlier Im multitasking alot, I mean we dont know what type of weaponry exists in black ops so as far as Im concerned measuring what is not known and only from the perspective of what is known can only be taken from a grain of salt. We dont know what we are really dealing with for sure, and Judy made that clear, its more about the crime scene first and you have to figure out the cause later, but you know somethings dont add up. Thats what an investigation entails.

I personally think if they used any type of higher tech that it was in combination of a weakened state with the plane crash of course, the explosives that clearly blasted as the towers collapses (the projectile fireballs were clearly seen some stories below the collapse point on the way down,) nano thermite...which are things we can prove more so than invisible tech, but if the tech was used it was used as an aid to the catastrophe. I dunno thats what I already speculated before I ever even heard of Judy Wood but I was aware of high end black ops futuristic tech years before that.

I dont think this is an issue of me being an idiot or educational background, I do have a college degree and I’m fine forming my own judgment and opinions, but this is more rather your not as open minded as alot of people Ive come across in the real world here, but I dont mean that in a derogatory way I was there once too.
Ben Rich-lockheed martin skunk works...'Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do'

Rich also said black projects were 40 years ahead of anything the public was aware of.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Ben Rich-lockheed martin skunk works...'Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do'

Rich also said black projects were 40 years ahead of anything the public was aware of.
Im gonna look him up and Ha! Ive been saying 30-50 years, he met me right at half way!! Whats amazing is there are things we dont even need to imagine and already know, but somehow Im witnessing how many in the general public is somehow falling 30-50 years backwards.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Ben Rich-lockheed martin skunk works...'Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do'

Rich also said black projects were 40 years ahead of anything the public was aware of.
A couple of parts from an article, interesting:
----------------------------------
Ben R. Rich, brilliant scientist, aeronautical engineer and Father of Stealth is more of an enigma now than he was during his lifetime. He is most noted for designing a stealth fighter-plane that flew undetected by radar and for his role as the second director of Lockheed Martin’s top-secret Skunk Works program. Born in 1925, Rich passed away in 1995 with controversy still brewing among his friends, critics and those who heard him speak publicly about whether or not he believed in UFOs and extraterrestrials.

Ben Rich’s “Deathbed Confession”

James Goodall, aerospace journalist and an in-demand public speaker, became friends with Ben Rich. Goodall states that he spoke with Rich about 10 days before Rich died. The conversation took place over the phone while Rich was in the USC Medical Center in Los Angeles where Goodall claims that Rich said, “Jim, we have things out in the desert that are fifty years beyond what you can comprehend. If you have seen it on Star Wars or Star Trek, we’ve been there, done that, or decided it wasn’t worth the effort. They have about forty-five hundred people at Lockheed Skunk Works. What have they been doing for the last 18 or 20 years? They’re building something.”

 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Holy crap, ever since the Firefighters for 9/11 Truth website came down (you know, those heroes who saved lives, who then turned to "kooks" for telling us what happened that day and censored by the media) I havent been able to find this image in a few years and finally found my old post from 6 years ago and its still up!

All 4 indestructible black boxes vaporized! Including one that fell on a farm....

But some how, some way, one of the hijackers paper passports made it through the giant fireball that supposedly molten so much steal that the bottom was like a metal foundry (according to FDNY) and landed on top of the rubble with hardly any damage, lol

I dont know how government makes this crap up and so many sheeple fall for it.

And people wonder why I question science the government feeds on on the “original” tube? They should make homes out of this passport material, nobody would ever be homeless ever again.
L
208438
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
@ax1 - Since you like youtube video explanations, here is a physicist taking apart Dr Judy Woods' goofy hypothesis about vaporizing the twin towers.

Dr Jenkins posted a full rebuttal paper with sourced references (PDF can be found here... http://911blogger.com/news/2007-02-27/overwhelming-implausibility-using-directed-energy-beams-demolish-world-trade-center-towers)

but I doubt you will ever read through it.

Much easier to just spam the same dopey theories each year on the 9/11 anniversary. Quantity over quality, and all....

I think a better question at this point, is why YOU believe in every conspiracy theory. Not just one, but all. Not just Santa, but the Easter bunny, and tooth fairy too. Using each one as being somehow 'possible' to make all the others possible. In an endless loop.

I don't know about your educational background, but there must be something in there to explain why you are drawn to such nonsense. Maybe you have always thought you were smarter than your college grades showed, and you harbor a psychological need to one day 'prove' you were smarter than them? I think at this point a little introspection is in order....

Looking at it another way, even if somehow one of your conspiracies might be true, it defies all logic and mathematical odds that ALL of them would be true. Our government is too incompetent to pull off even the most simple evacuation of Kabul. But somehow these evil geniuses coordinated a plane hitting the towers, a simultaneous controlled demolition, AND a space death beam vaporizing the pieces before falling... all at the exact same moment!?!??! Wow. Just wow.
I finished the video, its actually more of a shytshow than anything designed to make her look bad, not that he doesnt has legitimate questions or am I saying he is wrong, nor am I confirming Judy theory is right but she makes some very legitimate points that Jenkins cant answer. I dunno if you asked my first impression back in 2001 when the towers "collapsed" I would have said it look like it pulverized (or a term Judy created for good reason dustification,) Jenkins claims it "collapsed. I dunno you tell me. Ill clip the news from the next morning on the bottom of the post, even they thought the building was pulverized as if evaporated.

Closer to the end it appears even the audience is interested in Judy's theory and speaks out......
----------------------------
Comment from audience: Couldn't there be an answer that they collapsed and were pulverized at the same time? Both things happened?

JW: That's very misleading. ''Collapse".

Security guard enters the room and tells the Greg Jenkins camera crew they must leave.
---------------------------

Then at the end of the video you can see his roll eyes and he had obvious intent with the setup of the platform, it had nothing to do with learning and education but rather than a gotcha moment to make Judy look stupid and discredit her, but she does hold her own fairly well, especially when you read the transcript and take the human emotion out of it.

At the end of the video they like showing some picture, well here are some pictures to try to end this conversation, and to not have legitimate questions as to what happened and why, well there is nothing "kooky" about it, nor does it mean you think the earth is flat and or the Easter bunny works part time as a toothfairy. To not think the building leaned more towards pulverization rather than just a collapse as Jenkins claims is silly.
----------------------------------------------------
208440

Figure 17. The 'snowball' picture referred to in the discussion. Note Banker's Trust, the black building in the foreground, is a 40-story building. The photograph he provided was poorer quality and did not show the detail visible in the color version he inserted into the video. At the end, Greg Jenkins insisted on the return of the photo he provided, as can be seen in the video. Why would he insert a different photo for the audience than the one he showed to Dr. Wood?

208441

208442

Figure 20. What motivates Greg Jenkins to call this a collapse?
What motivates Greg Jenkins to manipulate others into calling this a collapse?

208443

Figure 21. Ground-level view of the enormous quantity of dust wafting skyward. Conventional demolition dust does not do this.


208444

Figure 9(a). (9/11/01) On the afternoon of 9/11/01 the "rubble pile" left from WTC1 is essentially non-existent. WTC7 can be seen in the distance, revealing the photo was taken before 5:20 PM that day.

208445

Figure 9(b). (9/11/01) The "rubble pile" from WTC1 is essentially non-existent. The ambulance is parked at ground level in front of WTC1. WTC6, which had been an eight-story building, towers over the remains of WTC1.

208446

Figure 9(c). (9/13/01) In contrast, the rubble pile for WTC7 appears to be higher. Why does a 47-story building appear to leave a taller rubble pile than either of the two 110-story towers left? WTC5 (9 stories) can be seen in the background on the left.
==================================================

Bonus, finding these video's are getting harder and harder:

ABC NEWS Peter Jennings on 9/11: "Where Did All The Rubble Go?"

Reporter on ground: The reason there is so little rubble that it all fell on the ground and it was pulverized, evaporated.

Link to vimeo video showing ground zero

 
Last edited:
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
Im gonna look him up and Ha! Ive been saying 30-50 years, he met me right at half way!! Whats amazing is there are things we dont even need to imagine and already know, but somehow Im witnessing how many in the general public is somehow falling 30-50 years backwards.
find what he had to say about the 'INVISIBLE' ship skunk work built for the navy--can you imagine the stuff they must have being 40-50 years ahead of todays technology...blows my mind!!!!

compare 1970s to today in terms of technology--DAMN!!!

here is something interesting for you---google major ed dames...i think you will find him fascinating!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ax1
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
find what he had to say about the 'INVISIBLE' ship skunk work built for the navy--can you imagine the stuff they must have being 40-50 years ahead of todays technology...blows my mind!!!!

compare 1970s to today in terms of technology--DAMN!!!

here is something interesting for you---google major ed dames...i think you will find him fascinating!!!!
Ah he is linked with the Stealth Bomber, Ive often used that analogy how they unveiled that during the first Gulf War to the public but it was tech they had from the 70s which actually had its roots in Nazi technology, with roots in the B-2 Spirit and B-21 Raider "flying wing" leading to the Horten Ho 229....I dont think they were there yet but they were working on radar absorbing material and at least got close. Anyways the point being what people may think is new is rather already outdated tech.

I will look them up including Major Ed Dames, this stuff is fascinating for sure....Sometimes I do wonder if all the alien tech screwing with our own official military is mostly if not all black ops, or if they reverse engineered a real ufo that is possible too.

The Germans outside of all that Nazi garbage were so absolutely incredible.

208450
208451
208452

208454
 

Attachments

thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
Ah he is linked with the Stealth Bomber, Ive often used that analogy how they unveiled that during the first Gulf War to the public but it was tech they had from the 70s which actually had its roots in Nazi technology, with roots in the B-2 Spirit and B-21 Raider "flying wing" leading to the Horten Ho 229....I dont think they were there yet but they were working on radar absorbing material and at least got close. Anyways the point being what people may think is new is rather already outdated tech.

I will look them up including Major Ed Dames, this stuff is fascinating for sure....Sometimes I do wonder if all the alien tech screwing with our own official military is mostly if not all black ops, or if they reverse engineered a real ufo that is possible too.

The Germans outside of all that Nazi garbage were so absolutely incredible.

View attachment 208450View attachment 208451View attachment 208452
View attachment 208454
i've heard that the military and government are behind the UFO drama to have cover for their stuff---the whole 'it's not anything our technology can do is just a crap show'?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ax1
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
find what he had to say about the 'INVISIBLE' ship skunk work built for the navy--can you imagine the stuff they must have being 40-50 years ahead of todays technology...blows my mind!!!!

compare 1970s to today in terms of technology--DAMN!!!

here is something interesting for you---google major ed dames...i think you will find him fascinating!!!!
I just subbed to Coast to Coast for a month just so I can hear that Judy Wood interview.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Watching Fox News right now…California, you all suck 🤦‍♂️
Damn! Didnt think it was going to be that much of a blowout...how the hell so many people still vote for him after how he has destroyed Cali so much is mind blowing.
 
Rad83

Rad83

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar
Damn! Didnt think it was going to be that much of a blowout...how the hell so many people still vote for him after how he has destroyed Cali so much is mind blowing.
Seems fishy! Or maybe Cali. is really just thaaat emasculated and beta now….
 
Beau

Beau

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Best Answer
Watching Fox News right now…California, you all suck 🤦‍♂️
Watching Fox News right now…California, you all suck 🤦‍♂️
Yes. We had a chance, but the quasi government unions FLOODED money into this. Apparently, Larry Elder is a white supremacist. Only in this state. California used to be a really nice place.
 
Beau

Beau

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Best Answer
Damn! Didnt think it was going to be that much of a blowout...how the hell so many people still vote for him after how he has destroyed Cali so much is mind blowing.
It basically appears to be along party lines. 48%+ Democrap, 24% Republicans and the rest are metro-odd balls
 
Rad83

Rad83

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar
Growing up I always wanted to, and pictured myself living in California,…maybe Culver City, Venice Beach or something….I’m disappointed, it’s not like the 80s and 90s (Swingers movie is a fave of mine too)
 
Beau

Beau

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Best Answer
Growing up I always wanted to, and pictured myself living in California,…maybe Culver City, Venice Beach or something….I’m disappointed, it’s not like the 80s and 90s (Swingers movie is a fave of mine too)
Born and raised in So-Cal. Went to college here. Worked at a well known amusement park while in college.

It was terrific.

That was then. It is now terrible.

Once I can convince my wife that we needn't be so close to our kids/grand-kids - we are GONE. Taxes, gas prices, cost of living, and the list goes on - and the public schools? I would not let them watch a pet, that someone else owned, and that I did not like. To say this area has turned into an area with nice weather, but with stupid politics, absurd prices and filled with a buch of liberal A-holes - would be an unfair statement to the other (non-California) A-holes.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
Afghanistan war secrets---google craig whitlock investigative reporter for washington post.

interesting stuff
 
  • Like
Reactions: ax1
puccah8808

puccah8808

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
puccah8808

puccah8808

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Born and raised in So-Cal. Went to college here. Worked at a well known amusement park while in college.

It was terrific.

That was then. It is now terrible.

Once I can convince my wife that we needn't be so close to our kids/grand-kids - we are GONE. Taxes, gas prices, cost of living, and the list goes on - and the public schools? I would not let them watch a pet, that someone else owned, and that I did not like. To say this area has turned into an area with nice weather, but with stupid politics, absurd prices and filled with a buch of liberal A-holes - would be an unfair statement to the other (non-California) A-holes.
I’m with you. Just waiting for a few things and I am out.
 
Ricky10

Ricky10

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
I know people goin to Texas or Nevada,…Where are you Californians thinking?
Hmmm….Texas and Nevada! That’s strange..

Personally, I would definitely avoid moving to those places at all costs! I don’t trust the situation with all these illegals pooling in around that area. No thanks….I’m good!
 
puccah8808

puccah8808

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
I know people goin to Texas or Nevada,…Where are you Californians thinking?
I’m looking at places in Texas and Tennessee. Nevada was glorious when I visited a few weeks ago. I mean Reno looked like sh*t but the town right outside was nice and conservative.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
Hmmm….Texas and Nevada! That’s strange..

Personally, I would definitely avoid moving to those places at all costs! I don’t trust the situation with all these illegals pooling in around that area. No thanks….I’m good!
lol...maine voted for biden and is considered a blue state.
 
puccah8808

puccah8808

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Just come to Maine….everyone else is doing it! And I mean everybody

If you can stand a good nip in the air it’s a great place to live!
I do have friends in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Maine does sound beautiful! Post pics of the New England fall trees, k?!
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
I’m looking at places in Texas and Tennessee. Nevada was glorious when I visited a few weeks ago. I mean Reno looked like sh*t but the town right outside was nice and conservative.
of the 3 you listed i personally would choose tennessee--but any one of them would be better than where you are now, imo.
 
Ricky10

Ricky10

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
lol...maine voted for biden and is considered a blue state.
Indeed it is! It doesn’t really matter though, life is quite conservative here regardless. We just have too many confused people apparently. We are also getting back our glorious Republican governor Paul LePage in 2 years! He was EXACTLY like President Trump, and everyone can’t wait to have him back!
I do have friends in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Maine does sound beautiful! Post pics of the New England fall trees, k?!
I don’t really ever take photos of that sort. I use the phone on my camera to fulfill other needs.

That sounds like fun though….I will!
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
Indeed it is! It doesn’t really matter though, life is quite conservative here regardless. We just have too many confused people apparently. We are also getting back our glorious Republican governor Paul LePage in 2 years! He was EXACTLY like President Trump, and everyone can’t wait to have him back!

lol...i guess i don't need to remind you what state president trump's VP was governor of-eh?
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
Well I did kind of forget, then I definitely remembered. How is he doing?
doing well, he is planning on being a member of the heritage foundation and buying a house in indiana, probably close to his hometown of columbus.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
anyone interested in a alternate view of what we are being told about environmental issues should check out Steve Goreham.
he is the primary guest on coast to coast AM tonight---looking forward to hearing what he has to say.
 
puccah8808

puccah8808

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Indeed it is! It doesn’t really matter though, life is quite conservative here regardless. We just have too many confused people apparently. We are also getting back our glorious Republican governor Paul LePage in 2 years! He was EXACTLY like President Trump, and everyone can’t wait to have him back!

I don’t really ever take photos of that sort. I use the phone on my camera to fulfill other needs.

That sounds like fun though….I will!
Lol, I don’t know why that made me laugh and think of this conversation I had with my coworker. They are taking me out to a goodbye luncheon today.

IMG_3821.JPG


It went right over her head.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
Steve Goreham has some interesting views towards 'climate change'.

coast to coast has been having really interesting guests lately---it's just really unfortunate that george noory is so awful at conducting interviews.... but on the flip side the show is making me aware of people i might not otherwise be aware of.

clyde lewis of ground zero radio show is a great interviewer and has his own thoughts on various current and interesting topics...unfortunately since clyde got censored on facebook/youtube he seems more interested in using his radio show for self promotion of his assortment of projects outside his original show--although he still throws out tidbits of info that i am not hearing on any other format.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ax1
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
you say it's your birthday
it's my birthday too, yeah
they say it's your birthday
we're going to have a good time...
 

Top