[toddgranit]

toddgranit and fubarmd......you both look lean.
but i would say you are closer to 10% than 7%.

<img src="http://anabolicminds.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=78 744"/>

Nope, I've been under 7% for a long time, I have pictures on here in my album you can check out, or my Bodyspace account on bodybuilding.com.
I've done Skinfold measurements monthly. I've never had pictures professionally done, just taken myself, in my bathroom in unfavorable lighting.

[Lukef2000]

toddgranit and fubarmd......you both look lean.
but i would say you are closer to 10% than 7%.

<img src="http://anabolicminds.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=78 744"/>

That picture is far from accurate it only gives a ball park figure. Everyone's fat distribution is different.

[SXIPro]

Went off an online calculator that used neck(15.5in), waist (28.5in) and height(65in)...

You're kidding.......right?

[FUBARMD]

You're kidding.......right?

Nope I have a tiny waist

[FUBARMD]

You're kidding.......right?

What's to kid about

[FUBARMD]

That picture is far from accurate it only gives a ball park figure. Everyone's fat distribution is different.

Agree

[SXIPro]

What's to kid about

Using the online calculator is ridiculous.That's like using a BMI chart. It makes no sense for anyone with any considerable lean body mass.

Get a set of calipers and learn how to measure BF correctly.

[theish11]

Has anyone tried or know about xtreme shred by anabolic technologies

[EasyEJL]

That picture is far from accurate it only gives a ball park figure. Everyone's fat distribution is different.

skipping that part (which is true), a guy who is 5'10 and 170 @ 10% bodyfat looks way different than a guy who is 5'10 and 210 @ 10% bodyfat. Its not simply that he's bigger either.

[threeFs]

Nothing like being told you're overweight by a fat doctor. That said, I never bothered with anything but a mirror (and not for the expensive cocaine diet). All the charts and graphs I've seen are for an "average" person, which excludes many on this forum because we exercise, which is anything but "average." They also do not incorporate a differentiation between lean mass vs adipose mass. I've asked doctors why they check my body weight and not my body fat % and I have yet to hear an answer besides crickets or stuttering some jibberish and avoidance of the question. In short, my experiences with doctors (and certainly there are ones out there who understand things) can be summed up as just a guy with an opinion and an RX pad.

[iparatroop]

Nothing like being told you're overweight by a fat doctor. That said, I never bothered with anything but a mirror (and not for the expensive cocaine diet). All the charts and graphs I've seen are for an "average" person, which excludes many on this forum because we exercise, which is anything but "average." They also do not incorporate a differentiation between lean mass vs adipose mass. I've asked doctors why they check my body weight and not my body fat % and I have yet to hear an answer besides crickets or stuttering some jibberish and avoidance of the question. In short, my experiences with doctors (and certainly there are ones out there who understand things) can be summed up as just a guy with an opinion and an RX pad.

Luckily, in my profession, weight is important, but bf% is of higher importance. I'm considered overweight, but I fall well within the acceptable bf% range.