+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Transdermal Primo Acetate???

  1.  03-11-2010  06:25 AM
    Registered User Whacked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Stats
    5'11"  210 lbs.
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    4,641
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    242018

    Transdermal Primo Acetate???


    Possible?
    If so, what TD carrier is suggested?



  2.  03-11-2010  10:53 AM
    Registered User isoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    366
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    250

    possible, but less efficient than oral most likely.

    •   


        
       

  3.  03-11-2010  01:42 PM
    Registered User airvine91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Stats
    6'2"  190 lbs.
    Location
    Parkland, Fl
    Posts
    110
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    104

    tough it out and put that needle in your but! Lol

    actually oral primo isnt very bioavailable thus the need for high doses. Think of Andriol, which was basically a test pill in a very high dose. Only so much is expected to make it through the liver.

    Topical in this case would be more bioavailable than oral, but IM is king.

  4.  03-11-2010  01:54 PM
    Registered User isoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    366
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    250

    actually, I have heard that oral primo acetate absorption is about 40%, which is going to be better than topical. As far as making an inj of the acetate I would say no, problems with crashing and have heard of major injection pain, this is a big reason you dont see inj primo acetate very often. But definitely most efficient and cost efficient is inj primo enanthate, I would say go that route, if the acetate powder is all you have maybe try both, but I would just eat it.

  5.  03-11-2010  07:40 PM
    Registered User airvine91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Stats
    6'2"  190 lbs.
    Location
    Parkland, Fl
    Posts
    110
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    104

    Originally Posted by isoc View Post
    actually, I have heard that oral primo acetate absorption is about 40%, which is going to be better than topical. As far as making an inj of the acetate I would say no, problems with crashing and have heard of major injection pain, this is a big reason you dont see inj primo acetate very often. But definitely most efficient and cost efficient is inj primo enanthate, I would say go that route, if the acetate powder is all you have maybe try both, but I would just eat it.
    in that case couldn't you just eat any powder with an ester and get 40% B/A?

    I wouldn't mind doing that for durabolin powder.

  6.  03-12-2010  06:08 AM
    Registered User Whacked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Stats
    5'11"  210 lbs.
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    4,641
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    242018

    No way in heck in ORal Primo 40% !!!

    I'd say closer to 10%

    Any experts around here?

  7.  03-12-2010  07:22 AM
    Registered User isoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    366
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    250

    that is what I heard on another board, it was talking specifically about one sources version of liquid oral. I do remember hearing that tren acetate is actually better absorbed orally than transdermally.

    Also, the absorption has to do with not just the ester, but the rest of the molecular structure, so no oral deca, test, etc. will not work.

    Either way, primo powder, go with enanthate ester, create an inj. If you do this with acetate you will probably not be able to handle the injections and will quit the cycle.

    IMO, the only item worth doing transdermal for is test no ester, it has no oral absorption and is very difficult to home brew. Yes td absorption will stil be low, maybe 15-20% max, but it is so cheap per gram is still not overly cost prohibitive.

  8.  03-12-2010  07:46 AM
    Registered User Whacked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Stats
    5'11"  210 lbs.
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    4,641
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    242018

    Brother, with all due respect, the board you got that info from is flat out looney. Not cutting on you but that is some serious ass misinformation.

    Oral Tren Ace and Oral Primo Ace is at best 5-10% (estimated)
    TD increases the absorption by at least 25% (estimated)

    Originally Posted by isoc View Post
    that is what I heard on another board, it was talking specifically about one sources version of liquid oral. I do remember hearing that tren acetate is actually better absorbed orally than transdermally.

  9.  03-12-2010  08:28 AM
    Registered User airvine91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Stats
    6'2"  190 lbs.
    Location
    Parkland, Fl
    Posts
    110
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    104

    anyone want to be a guinea pig for methyl-trienolone (true oral tren)??? :evilgrin:

    anyways, i would look into dermal or sublingual if you are afraid of needles.

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 42
    Last Post: 02-04-2006, 12:31 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-17-2003, 01:05 PM
  3. 1T Acetate?
    By Atavis in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-04-2003, 12:24 PM

Tags for this Thread