Most of us have heard of Mark Rippetoe's "Starting Strength" program, read the books and even tried it.
I applaud him for simplifying a lot of the information overload and finding something that actually works well without wasting time.
However, his idea is that most people are skinny young males who should simply lift heavy and eat huge amounts of food to put on mass.
I am not sure I agree with that. As many people have too much fat but not enough strength and not enough strength and muscle mass.
Is there any way Starting Strength could effectively be used as part of a fat loss protocol?
My guess is that someone could do the 3x a week Starting Strength routine, but also do high intensity cardio after that workout. They could also do an intensive cardio program like "Insanity" on their 3 off days.
Diet would be a more modest 2000 calories a day, etc.
Is there anything wrong with such a strategy? Would it still not be effective?
I applaud him for simplifying a lot of the information overload and finding something that actually works well without wasting time.
However, his idea is that most people are skinny young males who should simply lift heavy and eat huge amounts of food to put on mass.
I am not sure I agree with that. As many people have too much fat but not enough strength and not enough strength and muscle mass.
Is there any way Starting Strength could effectively be used as part of a fat loss protocol?
My guess is that someone could do the 3x a week Starting Strength routine, but also do high intensity cardio after that workout. They could also do an intensive cardio program like "Insanity" on their 3 off days.
Diet would be a more modest 2000 calories a day, etc.
Is there anything wrong with such a strategy? Would it still not be effective?