IF you had to only pick one, what would it be and why? Heavy 5x5 for bench or 10-15x5 with lighter weight for example.
Well I do, but just metaphorically if you were only able to do one for every workout what one would you pick?Why not both? Switch it up on different workouts, especially if you hit a body part twice a week.
For every exercise or just the main/first one? Can I do 5x5 for a main lift and then 8-15 reps for later subsequent lifts? Since I’m more focused on size than strength, I’d prefer to hit at least some 8-12+ rep sets, not just <5 reps every set.Well I do, but just metaphorically if you were only able to do one for every workout what one would you pick?
So you’d lean a little more towards intensity. Idk I figured it’d be a fun question to see what people would pick.For every exercise or just the main/first one? Can I do 5x5 for a main lift and then 8-15 reps for later subsequent lifts? Since I’m more focused on size than strength, I’d prefer to hit at least some 8-12+ rep sets, not just <5 reps every set.
I'd metaphorically kill myself
Yeah, you’re right.I know I'm being pedantic, but isn't "hypothetically" more appropriate here than "metaphorically?"
I got tired of same o same o and lifted high reps, lower weight this past summer. I made a good if not better gains.Well I do, but just metaphorically if you were only able to do one for every workout what one would you pick?
What? Are you saying that if I take my 8 rm on bench press from, hypothetically, 240 to 245 in a month, and repeat this rate of progression for any sustained period of time I won’t gain muscle? So if I go from benching 240x8 to benching 300x8 a year later I won’t have gained muscle muscle in that year? For a non-beginner, that’s a pretty respectable year-gain, and will certainly lead to a solid increase in muscle mass over the year. Am I misinterpreting or misunderstanding something you are saying?Let me just bring to the table that getting stronger absolutely works for gaining muscle. But how much muscle are you going to gain if you increase your 8RM by 5lb that month? Not a lot
However training density, muscular endurance, can be improved indefinitely. This is my main quarrel with HIT and DC Training. It works really well... while you can get stronger. Eventually you're going to run out of exercises that you can get stronger on in a one month period and then the ONLY OPTION you have is to increase training density and build on your muscular endurance
Yeah you mis read. I am saying that getting stronger is not sustainable in reality. Also, I would say that getting stronger is a by-product of the hypertrophy and not the actual cause of the hypertrophy. You're lifting more because you gained muscle - you're not gaining muscle because you lifted moreWhat? Are you saying that if I take my 8 rm on bench press from, hypothetically, 240 to 245 in a month, and repeat this rate of progression for any sustained period of time I won’t gain muscle? So if I go from benching 240x8 to benching 300x8 a year later I won’t have gained muscle muscle in that year? For a non-beginner, that’s a pretty respectable year-gain, and will certainly lead to a solid increase in muscle mass over the year. Am I misinterpreting or misunderstanding something you are saying?
Ok. I was thinking that even 5 pounds per month on an 8-RM isn’t sustainable long-term (as in multiple years) for a natural non-beginner, or we’d all be repping 400 haha. I’d still insist that if you’re ensuring you’re progressing regularly, be it in weight for X reps, or X reps with Y weight (of course increasing the weight once you hit a predetermined number of reps; we aren’t all just benching 135 for 50+ reps every set of every workout lol), you’ll gain muscle. Granted, some methods and progression is much more conductive to building muscle than others, but that’s a given really.Yeah you mis read. I am saying that getting stronger is not sustainable in reality. Also, I would say that getting stronger is a by-product of the hypertrophy and not the actual cause of the hypertrophy. You're lifting more because you gained muscle - you're not gaining muscle because you lifted more
I'll try hard to explain this a bit better, it might take a few posts of back and forth
It's something that people don't really discuss or understand in body building. They are focused on sets and reps and the ideal program but don't understand what they are doing
You can do a program that is aimed around increasing your 8RM. You'll increase it and get bigger muscles from it. But at a point you're not going to gain muscle from it because you're not giving the muscles anything new in regards to stimulus. I've squatted 440lb deep and controlled for sets of 8 yet have tiny legs The muscular adaptations to simply increasing strength stopped long ago
When you get to this point, you have to increase the muscular endurance of the muscle. This is why discussing sets and reps is largely pointless. Because everyone is going to have a different amount of endurance. And it's building on this endurance that is going to keep the muscle growing as it needs to adapt to this new workload
Yes obviously you can get stronger and progress. But at some point that is not sustainable. When you are at that point you need to increase the amount of mechanical work completed in a period of time which can be improved almost indefinitely. If you leg press then go straight to leg extensions then go straight to squats - you will be able to increase the weight you do on those squats for a very long timeOk. I was thinking that even 5 pounds per month on an 8-RM isn’t sustainable long-term (as in multiple years) for a natural non-beginner, or we’d all be repping 400 haha. I’d still insist that if you’re ensuring you’re progressing regularly, be it in weight for X reps, or X reps with Y weight (of course increasing the weight once you hit a predetermined number of reps; we aren’t all just benching 135 for 50+ reps every set of every workout lol), you’ll gain muscle. Granted, some methods and progression is much more conductive to building muscle than others, but that’s a given really.
Also, not to be a skeptic, but do you have videos of 440x8 on squats? Or records of some lift meets or something? That’s really impressive if it’s legit, not that I don’t believe you, it’s just the internet, so you never really know, you know?
Nice. Thanks man, definitely impressive. Yeah, I agree, we inevitably hit a point where progression on straight sets for X reps becomes virtually non-existent, so adding other ways to do more work becomes a more efficient/effective method of progression. I’ll agree with that. Either add another set(s), decrease the rest, do super/giant/drop sets, etc.Yes obviously you can get stronger and progress. But at some point that is not sustainable. When you are at that point you need to increase the amount of mechanical work completed in a period of time which can be improved almost indefinitely. If you leg press then go straight to leg extensions then go straight to squats - you will be able to increase the weight you do on those squats for a very long time
As for videos they are on my YouTube channel. I don't have a video of 440 for 8 but there are lots of other similar ones. There are some 460 paused squats, 550 singles, 620 deadlifts etc.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4wfdZGM7QFBlBEqthnT03w?view_as=subscriber
Yes, the goal of bodybuilding is to increase the endurance of the muscle and not the limit strength of the muscle.Nice. Thanks man, definitely impressive. Yeah, I agree, we inevitably hit a point where progression on straight sets for X reps becomes virtually non-existent, so adding other ways to do more work becomes a more efficient/effective method of progression. I’ll agree with that. Either add another set(s), decrease the rest, do super/giant/drop sets, etc.
Is that more along the lines of what you’re saying?
The goal of bodybuilding is to build big muscles and then to keep big muscles with very low body-fat. The means of how one achieves this primary goal are secondary. You can argue that increasing the endurance of the muscle is the most effective and/or efficient means to build muscle, but it is not itself the actual goal of bodybuilding, if that makes any sense. A bodybuilder is not judged based on his muscular endurance, but on the appearance of his muscles, so the goal is obviously to build muscle. I know I'm probably being pedantic at this point, but I think it's an important (and obvious) distinction.Yes, the goal of bodybuilding is to increase the endurance of the muscle and not the limit strength of the muscle.
I should work on a way of explaining this better... Or make some sort of system that everyone can follow. It's hard to explain and especially to new trainers. Learning to lift the weight with the muscle and not just hoist it around is hard enough
Yes, sure. If you don't supply adequate calories or do dumb **** like only triceps kickbacks than no amount of muscular endurance will get you largeThe goal of bodybuilding is to build big muscles and then to keep big muscles with very low body-fat. The means of how one achieves this primary goal are secondary. You can argue that increasing the endurance of the muscle is the most effective and/or efficient means to build muscle, but it is not itself the actual goal of bodybuilding, if that makes any sense. A bodybuilder is not judged based on his muscular endurance, but on the appearance of his muscles, so the goal is obviously to build muscle. I know I'm probably being pedantic at this point, but I think it's an important (and obvious) distinction.
Yeah, I’m just pointing out that any method of training progression is inherently secondary to the primary goal of building muscle. I agree with your point about training, I’m just saying that a bodybuilder’s primary goal is by definition to build muscle.Yes, sure. If you don't supply adequate calories or do dumb **** like only triceps kickbacks than no amount of muscular endurance will get you large
This. That is why I love PHAT or even a PPL routine where there are heavier days and hypertrophy days. Everyone should lift in all rep ranges, there is no reason to avoid some.Why not both? Switch it up on different workouts, especially if you hit a body part twice a week.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
new evomuse slintensity results? | Supplements | 5 | ||
EvoMuse Presents: Slintensity 2023 | Evomuse | 97 | ||
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) & Cortisol Creep: Is HIIT Bad for You? | IronMag Labs | 0 | ||
How to get Drive/Intensity back? | Nutrition / Health | 3 | ||
Is Volume Load the Real Measure of Intensity? | Training Forum | 17 |