What’s the point of doing squats if in fact you put muscles under tension far greater doing other leg exercises? That’s what causes growth, not heavy squats. Time under tension exhausting the muscles the main priority in bodybuilding. This is not a strong man competition. If you want to brag about heavy squatting go into powerlifting.
TUT When studied doesn't outweight the benefits of progressive overload or beating the log book.
Anyone can put a muscle under time under tension. Ayone can do a leg curl and hold a static hold for a minute. Does that mean its going to make your muscles grow or your body look better? Absolutely not.
[video=youtube;WMIWsOBF2ik]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=WMIWsOBF2ik[/video]
and while you think TUT is important, its not the main factor, and there is plenty of research to prove you wrong yet again in another worthless rant.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285070/
There was no difference in the load lifted for SLOW (31 ± 2 kg) or CTL (30 ± 2 kg) conditions
NO Difference when those who used TUT compared to controlled lifting.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22615008
Our results disprove the conventional belief that the use of external momentum (Extra TUT)necessarily reduces the overload of the target muscles. A moderate use of external momentum increases both the per-repetition peak torque and the total hypertrophy stimulus in a set.
TUT is more of a tool and intensity technique, its not a form of training. It doesn't provide a greater muscle stimulate to Type I muscle fibers (which benefit greater from strength training). Anyone can do a 3 rep squat and prolong it. Does that mean it helps increase protein synthesis or breakdown muscle fibers for muscle growth? Nope, and there is no research to prove TUT is a factor above progressive overload in beating the log book.
Slave yourself to training one way, one rep range, or one tactic and your negating your body's true potential of growing. There are far more benefits to a Squat then any isolation movement (More muscle fibers recruited, more testosterone, more growth hormone release). A lunge is just as dangerous as a squat pending form. Lunges can absolutely destroy your knees and if done wrong can put a lot of pressure on your low back and cause pain in your spine (some people have very weak cores and can't keep a neutral spine).
You have yet to post any knowledge, any research to prove your point. Then again you never have in any thread you make. It is more of you ranting about being natural, always wanting to diet, thinking bodybuilding is stupid yet your name is "Compete", and that women are bimbo's. Instead of stereotyping have some common knowledge and science to back your statements.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351575
insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) (ng·mL⁻¹) was higher with the 2/0/2 tempo only (pre-exercise: 277.4 ± 21.8, post-exercise: 308.1 ± 22.9; 2/0/4 tempo pre-exercise: 277.2 ± 17.6, post-exercise: 284.8 ± 21.2)
So higher IGF compared to the longer TUT Group
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/128681
. However, under the same conditions, or even after more prolonged stimulation,
no change in rates of protein synthesis was detected.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16177617
Training fast produces greater strength increases than training slow(TUT)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17194227
very-slow training resulted in lower levels of peak force and power when compared with a normal, self-regulated tempo.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16287371
a traditional training tempo resulted in greater strength in the Squat and greater peak power compared to time under tension training.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993022
University of Oklahoma found that 4 weeks of traditional resistance training was more effective for increasing strength than super-slow training.