Are there results yet?
It was used as marketing when the product was first released, but yet was never conducted or shown to anyone.I think this issue on a university study was brought up over a year ago.
BAM is Bad-Ass-Masswut is BAM? wuts wrong with AX? personal preference or wut?
:goodpost:He is absolutely correct.The results are on bb.com. Also apparently in an add in FLEX. So everybody saying AX made it up, you're wrong. Results were favorable as well. But I'm not gonna do the work to paste it over for you. Find it yourself or hope AX brings it over here.
Dang bro where you live? Im here in ohio. Right near canal winchester.Wright State University allegedly.
It is located near Dayton, Ohio. I pass around the area when I go home sometimes.
It's kinda a low-rung/commuter university, IMO.
Maybe I can convince our athletic department to do this....And be a tester for them Mass FX and Hyperdrol x2Wow, some strong hate from mostly names I've never seen before. Thanks for the unkind words, folks! We love ya!! :lol:
In all seriousness... We had NOTHING to do with getting the results together. All AX did was supply the product. The idea wasn't even our's to do the study. But since they wanted to do it, AX gladly obliged. It was controlled, planned, and done solely by the Univ. itself. Results are soon out, or they are already. (I've been offline for a few days.) It wasn't our job to put the results out, as they were composed by the University. When they are released to the public, so shall they be released to us to post for you.
As politely as I can say it - end of story.
results look pretty decent to me.Okie doke. My apologies to AX.
its here fore anyone who would like to look at it
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=6954571&page=24
Bench increases by 800% (over placebo)
Okie doke. My apologies to AX.
its here fore anyone who would like to look at it
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=6954571&page=24
Bench increases by 800% (over placebo)
damn, tim. high regards, for the mature response. i have my problems with ax at times but lots of credit for subdued response.No apologies necessary. It's gonna take a heck of a lot more to get my dander!! I'm flyin high on life this week!! :cheers:
Much obliged for digging up the link. For what it's worth, reps...
Yes, I have a feeling there will be many very obvious flaws to this study when its actually posted, but I will wait to see.Waiting for the study before I weigh in, although the bench improvement in the placebo has got me with several Q's.
According to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] and the list goes on and on and on.... the ETA is a few days from now.as far as i can tell, the actual study was not released. just a teaser about bench increases over placebo group. according to [email protected], he said ETA is a few days now
As far as I know, someone at the University itself brought the idea of the study up. They may have been a fan of MassFX, or wanted to study something - I don't remember exactly. The Univ. footed the bill for the study, with AX chipping in for the product and possibly for some of the bloodwork - not enough money given by AX to sway the tests, mind you, just to aid in costs at the request of the University. Afterall, if you were a company who could possibly see something good out of someone studying a part of you, wouldn't you want to help out just a bit without skewing the results? Reasons for conducting the study were myriad, but can best be summed up by saying that the purpose was most likely to find out what everyone wanted to know - does it work, does it live up to the label claims, and is it any good?just a few quick questions. since ax had nothing to do with this study, why did they choose it? what other products are they researching? my understanding is a controlled study is expensive, what were their reasons for conducting this study in the first place, what exactly are they hoping to find? and finally if ax is not paying the bill, who is?
just can't see where a university could justify research money being spent to see if a random product works. wonder what the cost justification is. after all expenditures have to be accounted for, i can't see doing a study to satisfy a whim as being justified.As far as I know, someone at the University itself brought the idea of the study up. They may have been a fan of MassFX, or wanted to study something - I don't remember exactly. The Univ. footed the bill for the study, with AX chipping in for the product and possibly for some of the bloodwork - not enough money given by AX to sway the tests, mind you, just to aid in costs at the request of the University. Afterall, if you were a company who could possibly see something good out of someone studying a part of you, wouldn't you want to help out just a bit without skewing the results? Reasons for conducting the study were myriad, but can best be summed up by saying that the purpose was most likely to find out what everyone wanted to know - does it work, does it live up to the label claims, and is it any good?
I wonder if it was someone's thesis for grad school. I'm not so sure my university that I attended would conduct such a study.just can't see where a university could justify research money being spent to see if a random product works. wonder what the cost justification is. after all expenditures have to be accounted for, i can't see doing a study to satisfy a whim as being justified.
i was under the impression that studies had to be funded or at least show a potential for viable profits. i just can't see a university footing the bill merely to see if a particular supplement works.I wonder if it was someone's thesis for grad school. I'm not so sure my university that I attended would conduct such a study.
Eh - dunno about the profits part. I think if you can show the study moving forward some part of science or whatever then it can be OK'ed.i was under the impression that studies had to be funded or at least show a potential for viable profits. i just can't see a university footing the bill merely to see if a particular supplement works.
Correct. The study was done for the original MFX, not MFX Max. Due to the length of time that it took for the Univ to get the paperwork and red tape taken care of, switching in MFX Max just wasn't an option.this study is for the original mass fx correct? how relevant is the study for the new mass fx?
:clap2:Perhaps things are just done to be done, that's all.
No one is arguing that I can see.As for all of the skeptics and funding questions, the only thing we can do is wait and see. Again, personally, I don't see the point in arguing validity based on what "someone has to gain". Perhaps things are just done to be done, that's all. We'll find out more when we find out more.
No offense, but you don't see it because you are one side of the equation - the business side - and not the research/academic side. You are right though...in the absence of a real report (including any financial interests), the argument is moot.As for all of the skeptics and funding questions, the only thing we can do is wait and see. Again, personally, I don't see the point in arguing validity based on what "someone has to gain". Perhaps things are just done to be done, that's all. We'll find out more when we find out more.
I stand corrected on the "business" part and in reading threads about this study, I have certainly noted that you seem supportive, helpful and while a "fan" largely unbiased.I completely agree with you Jack o' Shadows. I do believe that all of that information will be revealed with the release of the documents.
Only one little mistake in there. I'm not on the business side of things. It isn't my job, nor has it ever been, to sell AX or its products. I merely answer questions based on personal experience and the collective experiences of other users. I may be the one AX rep who uses the science the least, simply because I'm not always in complete understanding of it. Nor are most others out there who are looking for help. Being a rep doesn't make me an employee. It makes me someone who can answer questions, be hospitable, and do so honestly with regards to the products I like. If I wasn't a rep, I'd still be a fan. That's never been a secret. In all honesty, when BigSmith called me to ask if I wanted to be a rep, I asked "What do I have to do?". His response was to "Keep doing what you've been doing." I can't help it - people helped me out, and I wanna give back. Perhaps that makes me odd...
But like all others, I await the results of the study and hope that all will be satisfied. If anyone has questions about it, we'll try to get the right University contacts for you.
Thanks, everyone, for following and anticipating.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Global supremacy hybrid mass? | Anabolics | 2 | ||
massages after workout, good for recovery and bad for gains? | Nutrition / Health | 11 | ||
Massage gun | General Chat | 19 | ||
Raze mass caps | Supplements | 62 | ||
MassFX university study ? | Supplements | 23 |