![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| ||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
| | #1 |
| Registered User | Liver Longer If any thermolife reps are here, I would like it if they could address this issue. I have done some google searching on the active ingredient in Liver Longer (TUDCA), and one of its main mechanisms of action is that it prevents apoptosis. This would be consistent with the fact that I read a report saying that early studies show that it can lead to tumor growth. I am not sure this is the best choice yet, and I think it may need further research, but maybe I'm wrong. Could you show me some studies or research supporting TUDCA (how it works and its safety maybe)? What does everyone else think? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Registered User | I guess no one knows? =\ |
| | |
| | #3 |
| TCP™ Puttin' the P back in Pimp Board Moderator | Wrong section buddy. A wise man said: Once you come ashore you will have a renewed appreciation for the simple things and find a joy that may have been missed, overlooked or otherwise unappreciated before. You will be a greater witness to those who will need you when they are a drift in that sea. "I don't need no one to tell me about heaven, I look at my daughter, and I believe." |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Registered User | i for one have never heard of this, although now a days everything can cause a tumor or cancer or speed up the process. please post the studies you found, i would like to read them. sounds kind of weird because i have always read that TUDCA helps extend the life of many types of cells in the body and helps prevent the damage of nerves. has a relatively good bioavailability and has positive effects after around 250-300mg. here are a few i had off hand that i read a long time ago, i will also email Ron (owner) and see if he has any in-house or lab studies/test somewhere. *http://www.huntingtonproject.org/Portals/0/TUDAC.pdf(good one) *TUDCA, J7(good one) *Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid (TUDCA) in HD (this one is okay) *Tauroursodeoxycholate inhibits human cholangiocarcinoma growth via Ca2+-, PKC-, and MAPK-dependent pathways -- Alpini et al. 286 (6): G973 -- AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology (in this study, i believe the Mz-ChA-1 cell they talk about has to do with liver cells, nothing about tumorous) as far as results with liver longer, they're a few guys on the board who got test before/during alkalated orals and the results are very good. you can search around and find quite a few of them. Iron is my greatest friend. Iron never freaks out on me, never runs. Friends come and go, but 200lbs will always be 200lb. ~ Henry Rollins Ralph4u2c is a fictitious character so far fetched that my name isn't even Ralph and in no way reflects the views of Thermolife --- Thermolife Rep. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Registered User | http://www.huntingtonproject.org/Portals/0/TUDAC.pdf Check out the part on human safety. They talk about possible hepatoxicity and tumor development. Tumor development would make sense if TUDCA extends the life of cells and prevents apoptosis. Kind of like IGF |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Registered User | says it isn't "substantiated in humans" based off preclinicals. i am also wondering how long you would have to dose this before things of this nature would begin to take an effect. dosage regime of Liver Longer is 30 days, 1,2, or 3 times a year tops. this really is not really a long dosing time but i will keep researching on this topic. gives me something to do for the next few days i have read countless good things about TUDCA, i guess will positives also comes negatives. i will see if uhockey or any other doctors can chime in as well.Iron is my greatest friend. Iron never freaks out on me, never runs. Friends come and go, but 200lbs will always be 200lb. ~ Henry Rollins Ralph4u2c is a fictitious character so far fetched that my name isn't even Ralph and in no way reflects the views of Thermolife --- Thermolife Rep. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Registered User | Okay so for now best suggestion would be run it for the duration of your 30 day cycle and then that's it. I would agree with you. Long term use would not be a great idea. |
| | |
![]() | ||