This is actually incorrect. Lots of guys used it well before release. Including several forum members. Reps and non reps. So saying nobody has used it it false.
Also, I'm sure you have heard of product logs before. Where someone takes a product and updates as the product administration progresses. It's extremely common. In fact I would be surprised if you personally hadn't run a few logs. I feel like your post is disingenuous.
I simply said no one has ran a full cycle. I did not know there were beta testers. Regardless, I still doubt someone has ran a full cycle solo, plus stacked it with the TWO other supplements the OP is thinking about stacking Vector with.
How is my post disingenuous? With it being so new, unless one ran Vector solo in the past, which if it were beta testers, is a minority of forum members, assessing it while stacking it does not provide any feedback, positive or negative. This is why I and others suggest running products solo first before stacking them.
Again, how long has Vector been out to the public? A month, if that? My point is it is VERY unlikely one has ran FD 2.0, X-Gels, and Vector each solo and is now stacking them. This is especially true given X-Gels is ran for 50 workouts days, which for most would be a 10-12 week cycle, pushing the start of their X-Gels cycle before the release of Vector.