Best laxogenin product they have taken

Page 3 of 3 First 123

  1. Quote Originally Posted by redman24 View Post
    . a 2 month aas cycle will not yield a single gram of muscle a month or so after pct unless you are way under your genetic limit. one must be on always or bridge otherwise all is lost. disappears ones the water leaves the muscle and you deflate into your prior state.
    You are so entirely wrong....what in the world

    Unbelievably incorrect...


  2. every natty at his genetic limit who did one single cycle ended up losing everything to fall back to his genetic limit. i am talking about people training for 20 years, not newbies increasing their arms from 15 to 16 inches and keeping 15.5
    i am talking about people with 18 inch arms and max. 12% bf. a single cycle of testosterone will never in the world create lasting muscle beyond that.
    every serious competitor or competiton level athlete is on all the time or bridging. i have seen guys in the most insane shape on all kinds of gear. 2 months after stopping, so about a month after pct they lost 25lbs and there was nothing left of the round shoulders, the thin vascular skin and strength plummets by 30-40%.

    i assume you are either on a very low level of development or have taken aas forever and dont remember what its like to be natural. i lost 45 pounds in 2 years without training or aas. all of it was muscle or more as i was at a bf% lower than most competitors and my strenght was insane, pullups with 140lbs added weight, flyes with 115lbs dumbbels incline, barbell bench rown 420lbs at a bodyweight of 1pprox 188lbs with nearly 18 inch arms. skinfold on abs 2mm max and veins all over them. there was barely any excess glycogen or any excess water in my body at that bf% and strength, it was real muscle that didnt look like big balloons but there were so many details i never know they existed. i wish i had the pics still. i have pic that would impress people but they are **** compared to my best shape. i had 8 or 9 stripes on the sides of my abs.
    at the worst you would have never been able to tell i ever exercised and i looked starved. none of it is permanent. training would have maybe kept me looking like a soccer player.
    in my case the aas didn't really build fake muscle but allowed me to train a way i normally never could have. i was always abnormally strong for my weight so i saw them as a supplement for increasing workout capacity (this is very individual as the effects on the cns are limited, but i have a medical condition and the right aas combination+medication allows for insane workout volume and frequency, which in combination with all the right supplements lead to me being able to work out 5xweek, full body, sometimes 2xdaily and need 5000calories not to lose more weight.)
    so really its the training that gives the results and for healthy people aas dont do much in terms of cns recovery, seriously thats a myth, the only thing that does is masteron. and good masteron is nearly impossible to find. also trestolon is actually anabolic, people dont understand that aas are hardly proteinanabolic. anticatabolic and glycogenanabolic yes. but deca,dbol will not give any real muscle gains unless you add them to a base which is always there. maybe tren can build some lasting muscle, trestolon is far stronger than tren, deca and masteron combined or test, tren, dbol. its also the only steroid giving strength gains after the glycogen induced bouncing effect has leveled out. (of course you can bench more on dbol when you are a trampoline). i dont mean 1-2 reps, i mean more plates every workout and gains of 20-30% weight (which is a lot when you are already rowing 350 pounds and you have no bench that works for the bench row in the gym your at, 5 weeks later you return to an increase of 70lbs.)

    but one test cycle for a natty who has reached his limit years ago and is bigger and stronger than most people on aas will not yeld keepable gains.
    you realize mr. olympia contenders are so full of insulin and synthol (yes everyone uses it) that they have min. 60lbs of mass that is not muscle? hence why jay cutler cannot lift my warmup weight on back exercises.
    •   
       


  3. Quote Originally Posted by redman24 View Post
    every natty at his genetic limit who did one single cycle ended up losing everything to fall back to his genetic limit. i am talking about people training for 20 years, not newbies increasing their arms from 15 to 16 inches and keeping 15.5
    i am talking about people with 18 inch arms and max. 12% bf. a single cycle of testosterone will never in the world create lasting muscle beyond that.
    every serious competitor or competiton level athlete is on all the time or bridging. i have seen guys in the most insane shape on all kinds of gear. 2 months after stopping, so about a month after pct they lost 25lbs and there was nothing left of the round shoulders, the thin vascular skin and strength plummets by 30-40%.

    i assume you are either on a very low level of development or have taken aas forever and dont remember what its like to be natural. i lost 45 pounds in 2 years without training or aas. all of it was muscle or more as i was at a bf% lower than most competitors and my strenght was insane, pullups with 140lbs added weight, flyes with 115lbs dumbbels incline, barbell bench rown 420lbs at a bodyweight of 1pprox 188lbs with nearly 18 inch arms. skinfold on abs 2mm max and veins all over them. there was barely any excess glycogen or any excess water in my body at that bf% and strength, it was real muscle that didnt look like big balloons but there were so many details i never know they existed. i wish i had the pics still. i have pic that would impress people but they are **** compared to my best shape. i had 8 or 9 stripes on the sides of my abs.
    at the worst you would have never been able to tell i ever exercised and i looked starved. none of it is permanent. training would have maybe kept me looking like a soccer player.
    in my case the aas didn't really build fake muscle but allowed me to train a way i normally never could have. i was always abnormally strong for my weight so i saw them as a supplement for increasing workout capacity (this is very individual as the effects on the cns are limited, but i have a medical condition and the right aas combination+medication allows for insane workout volume and frequency, which in combination with all the right supplements lead to me being able to work out 5xweek, full body, sometimes 2xdaily and need 5000calories not to lose more weight.)
    so really its the training that gives the results and for healthy people aas dont do much in terms of cns recovery, seriously thats a myth, the only thing that does is masteron. and good masteron is nearly impossible to find. also trestolon is actually anabolic, people dont understand that aas are hardly proteinanabolic. anticatabolic and glycogenanabolic yes. but deca,dbol will not give any real muscle gains unless you add them to a base which is always there. maybe tren can build some lasting muscle, trestolon is far stronger than tren, deca and masteron combined or test, tren, dbol. its also the only steroid giving strength gains after the glycogen induced bouncing effect has leveled out. (of course you can bench more on dbol when you are a trampoline). i dont mean 1-2 reps, i mean more plates every workout and gains of 20-30% weight (which is a lot when you are already rowing 350 pounds and you have no bench that works for the bench row in the gym your at, 5 weeks later you return to an increase of 70lbs.)

    but one test cycle for a natty who has reached his limit years ago and is bigger and stronger than most people on aas will not yeld keepable gains.
    you realize mr. olympia contenders are so full of insulin and synthol (yes everyone uses it) that they have min. 60lbs of mass that is not muscle? hence why jay cutler cannot lift my warmup weight on back exercises.
    Reading your posts makes my head hurt. You are a strange individual.

  4. Quote Originally Posted by bobthejack View Post
    Power my self has EPG Laxo 100mg per tab 60 tabs 29.99
    AS much as threads like this can be helpful , there are at times where you feel youre taking one step forward and two back.
    I too am keen to try laxo and checked up on the recommendation as above .However on the website , *********** , this product has only got 2 stars , one good , the other user having an adverse reaction to it., so the question your left with is do you want to take that chance?

  5. I'm really excited for OL's new product. It has the right amount of Laxo, IMO and the other ingredients look interesting.
    Performax Labs Product Specialist
    Follow My Journey: http://anabolicminds.com/forum/workout-logs/269588-antms-lean-bulk.html
    •   
       

  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. BEST LAXOGENIN PRODUCT
    By vascopro in forum Supplements
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 05-16-2017, 10:34 PM
  2. Strongest laxogenin product they've tried?
    By Ryan5550 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-28-2017, 03:33 PM
  3. BEST LAXOGENIN PRODUCT
    By vascopro in forum Natural Bodybuilding
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-27-2016, 03:39 PM
  4. Replies: 63
    Last Post: 01-31-2016, 09:19 PM
  5. Best NO product you have used.
    By Phofer91 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 10-22-2010, 03:10 PM
Log in
Log in