SuperMandro (1-Andro) Cycle -- Looking for advice for PCT and Dosage help

Dilen1217

New member
Awards
0
Looking to go for a 1-Andro cycle. Seems like a relatively safe oral compound. Have been interested in other things but I'm looking to stay away from a needle. Also looking to reduce sides a much as possible.

Basically looking to do the SuperMandro 4 pills a day for 6 weeks. So about 400mg of the 1-Andro a day. First question is the dosage reasonable for this and should I go up or down?

Secondly what kind of PCT should I be looking at. I'm leaning towards Clomid or Nolva to be as safe as possible. Two questions related to this. First is what kind of dosages and how long should I be doing for this. Second is should I be using Clomid/Nolva even if I don't experience any sides after ending the cycle?

This is my first time going for this so I'm looking to get some final advice before jump in.

Thanks for any input!
 
dustter

dustter

Member
Awards
0
I'm finishing my cycle now of this. For my first cycle I only ran it for 4 weeks. Youll want a test base, i used andro the giant (4andro).
You'll need an estrogen blocker, if you run 4 andro. Possibly joint support or drink lots of water.

My PCT is
Post cycle 3x
Rebirth by BLR
DAA Max

I would suggest nolva and sup3r PCT, IMO
 
LeanEngineer

LeanEngineer

Legend
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • Best Answer
  • First Up Vote
I would check out the super mandro and andro the giant stack and run them as directed. They go great together and theres logs on them. I would run nolva 20/20/10/10 and an otc pct product for pct as well.
 
lifted67

lifted67

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
I would check out the super mandro and andro the giant stack and run them as directed. They go great together and theres logs on them. I would run nolva 20/20/10/10 and an otc pct product for pct as well.
Would you still run 20/20/10/10 for an 8 week cycle of super mandro, Andro the giant, and Androvar?
 
murman89

murman89

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
I would say run at 300 for 8 weeks with 4 andro at the same, rather than 400 for 6. They really only kick in around week 3-4, the time would serve you better on than the 100mg I think.
 
lifted67

lifted67

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
I'm finishing my cycle now of this. For my first cycle I only ran it for 4 weeks. Youll want a test base, i used andro the giant (4andro).
You'll need an estrogen blocker, if you run 4 andro. Possibly joint support or drink lots of water.

My PCT is
Post cycle 3x
Rebirth by BLR
DAA Max

I would suggest nolva and sup3r PCT, IMO
What do you think of nolva+Rebirth+sup3r as a PCT?
 
VaughnTrue

VaughnTrue

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
why use that product when you can get a product dosed with 110mg/pill that utilizes a significantly enhanced delivery system? OL has 110mg/pill and SEDDS delivery, and Hi-Tech has 110mg/pill and Cyclosome delivery.


Why use a delivery system?

Delivery system technologies are used primarily for two distinct purposes:

1. Blood hormone levels – The key to hormones is to getting them into your bloodstream where they can interact with androgen receptors. The higher you can get your blood hormone levels, the better results you can theoretically get while on cycle. To put this into perspective, imagine you are consuming a hormone at the rate of 100mg/day. If you can get 25% of this hormone into your blood stream, you will have 25mg of the compound able to produce its anabolic and muscle growing benefits for you. The remaining 75% will offer you no added benefit. This means that by increasing the rate at which the hormone can enter your blood stream, the higher the total amount of hormone you have to exert its power in your body.
2. Mitigating unwanted/undesirable effects – This issue encompasses two major issues.

The first issue is the same for all hormones. The higher the dose taken the more potential for side effects. For example, if the same compound is being used (as described above) at a rate of 100mg/day, it will yield 25mg of the active hormone. Now, the other 75mg will not be able to impact the body for anabolic purposes, but it still impacts the body in ways such as liver toxicity. This means that for every 100mg you ingest, 25% if going to its intended “good” purpose, and 75% is going to unwanted “bad” result.

The second issue is specific to DHEA and its various anabolic isomers. DHEA converts to numerous different hormones, some of which are beneficial (anabolic), and some of which are not (estrogenic). Studies have shown that when specific DHEA dosage thresholds are broken, virtually all DHEA taken beyond that amount converts to the negative/estrogenic hormones. This means that by utilizing a lower overall dose that offers a higher bioavailability you are able to reap much larger benefits, while reducing or completely eliminating unwanted estrogenic conversion.



No Delivery System

When 1-DHEA and 4-DHEA products first hit the market, they were sold by themselves without any delivery system, just the hormone in a capsule. Despite using no delivery system, it is worthy to note that users experienced significant results, as backed by clinical studies performed at West Texas A&M University.
The various forms of DHEA being discussed follow similar absorption and bioavailability of traditional DHEA. Studies which look to discern the potencies of DHEA have found it to be absorbed at a very low rate when taken orally. For example:



As this study shows, when you consume DHEA and its various isomers(like 1-DHEA or 4-DHEA) you’re left with around a 3%-6% rate of bioavailability(underlined in red above).
To put this into perspective, if you were taking the manufacturers recommended daily dosing of 330mg/day of 1-DHEA, your body would be absorbing only 9.9-19.8mg of the active hormone itself! And even at these low doses the results seen were impressive, including significant gains in lean mass, reductions in fat, and strength.
In addition to the low blood hormone levels which are offered from having no delivery system, this issue is also coupled with the fact that the small % of conversion to active hormones leaves a high % of the compound left over that has no pathway left to convert besides estrogenic hormones(unwanted). One example of these unwanted side effects can be seen in the lowering of LDL or “good cholesterol” in the Texas A&M study.

What does all of this mean? Simply put, if you’re consuming 1-DHEA or 4-DHEA without a delivery system included in its formulation, you can expect extremely low conversion of the compounds into their target hormones(1-testosterone and testosterone), and a highly level of conversion into unwanted estrogenic hormones. This means you can get solid cycle results, but must deal with some potential negatives.





SEDDS Delivery System

SEDDS or “Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems” is a new delivery system which is just about to hit the dietary supplement market. This method of delivery system claims to work as a result of: “SEDDS possess potential to improve oral bioavailability in poorly water soluble drugs. Following their oral administration, these systems rapidly disperse in gastrointestinal fluids, yielding micro- or nano-emulsions containing the solubilized drug. Micro/non-emulsified drug can easily be absorbed through lymphatic pathways, bypassing the hepatic first-pass effect, owing to their miniscule globule size” (National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research).
SEDDS delivery vastly improves the effects from 1-DHEA and 4-DHEA by increasing overall bioavailability up to 9x greater than non-delivery system administration. This claim can be seen below:



Source: https://www.docdroid.net/dnVJvPF/sedds-absorption-2.pdf.html

This study showed that when using a hormone (in this case progesterone) SEDDS offers up to 9x greater bioavailability when compared to no delivery system. This means that while no delivery system offers 3-6% bioavailability, SEDDS offers up to 9x that, or a 27-54% bioavailability. Keep in mind however that the higher end of this bioavailability spectrum is highly unlikely for the average user as it assumes perfect conversions in the body, something which never happens in vivo quite the same as it does in vitro. That being said, SEDDS offers a VAST improvement from traditional dosing of these compounds, and users can expect far greater results, fewer side effects, and less overall HPTA shutdown when using the SEDDS delivery method over no delivery method.
In short, SEDDS provides a much higher rate of bioavailability, lesser chance for estrogenic conversion, and a much more effective cycle.






Cyclosome™ Delivery System/Phytosome Delivery System
Cyclosome™ delivery system is the first completely pharmaceutical grade delivery system utilized in dietary supplements. Originally designed by Indena® under the name Phytosome®, Cyclosome™ utilizes identical technology to increase the bioavailability and intensity of 1-DHEA and 4-DHEA.
For quick reference, this video briefly explains how the technology works:

[video=youtube;extbuY3CvCk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=extbuY3CvCk[/video]​


Studies on humans (not rats, rabbits, pigs, dogs, or anything else), have shown Cyclosome™ technology to enhance bioavailability 29xhigher than non-delivery system methods, bringing with it a minimum of 90% bioavailability (Source: Phytosome®)

In a comparative study in humans(16), analyzing the absorption of curcumin Phytosome® (Meriva®) and curcumin the overall curcuminoid absorption was about 29-fold higher for Meriva® compared to the unformulated curcuminoid mixture, while a 50 to 60 fold higher absorption has been shown for demethoxycurcumin (DMC) and bisdemethoxycurcumin (BDMC). Furthermore also the absorption was faster with Meriva® the with the unformulated curcumin.

This type of delivery system showcases what is currently known as the most effective way of increasing bioavailability for compounds such as 1-DHEA and 4-DHEA. This means much more potent and anabolic cycles, little to no estrogenic side effects, and minimal HPTA suppression.




How do the 3 types perform when compared using identical doses?​

To help you determine which delivery system (or lack thereof) is best for you in your search for the best cycle possible, here is a quick and easy guide. No delivery system will be abbreviated using “NDS”, SEDDS will be abbreviated as “SED”, and Cyclosome™ technology will be abbreviated as “CST”.
100mg/day dosing:
NDS x 100mg (3-6% bioavailability) = 3-6mg 1-DHEA/4-DHEA in the blood
SED x 100mg (3-6% bioavailability) x 9 = 27-54mg 1-DHEA/4-DHEA in the blood
CST x 100mg (3-6% bioavailability) x >90% bioavailability = greater than 90mg 1-DHEA/4-DHEA in the blood

To understand which delivery system is best for you, it’s crucial that you understand how the product you’re planning on purchasing is dosed, as this varies greatly from manufacturer to manufacturer. For example, if one product gives you 60srv of 50mg capsules, versus 60srv of 100mg capsules, this may play a role in how you decide which is the better overall value.
 
Afi140

Afi140

Legend
Awards
4
  • Best Answer
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Established
why use that product when you can get a product dosed with 110mg/pill that utilizes a significantly enhanced delivery system? OL has 110mg/pill and SEDDS delivery, and Hi-Tech has 110mg/pill and Cyclosome delivery.
Because the study published used the exact doses as mandro and Giant (you just referenced it yourself in another thread). Doesn't Hi tech only use have 60 caps at 110mg as well?

I'm not sold on the delivery system yet but not fully opposed. I am just saying there is very GOOD reason to use these products. I have ran them several times and the result were great each time. Next andros I use will be the 90 cap OL.
 
VaughnTrue

VaughnTrue

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Because the study published used the exact doses as mandro and Giant (you just referenced it yourself in another thread). Doesn't Hi tech only use have 60 caps at 110mg as well?

I'm not sold on the delivery system yet but not fully opposed. I am just saying there is very GOOD reason to use these products. I have ran them several times and the result were great each time. Next andros I use will be the 90 cap OL.
what I'm saying is that you get the same dosage from each(I believe anyway) and they're just about the same price.

so why use one at the same dose/price that doesn't have a delivery system(which is PROVEN to significantly increase bioavailability), when you can get one with the delivery system for the same dose/price?
 
Afi140

Afi140

Legend
Awards
4
  • Best Answer
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Established
what I'm saying is that you get the same dosage from each(I believe anyway) and they're just about the same price.

so why use one at the same dose/price that doesn't have a delivery system(which is PROVEN to significantly increase bioavailability), when you can get one with the delivery system for the same dose/price?
Because one is proven at 330mg without any delivery system. Is the hi-tech 220mg or 330mg?
 
VaughnTrue

VaughnTrue

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Because one is proven at 330mg without any delivery system. Is the hi-tech 220mg or 330mg?
they're 110mg/pill, so you can take 220mg/day or 330mg/day.

can you show me a link to the product in question? I want to check it out

edit: just found it. they offer more of the total hormone, 60 tabs vs 90 caps. so they have that going for them.


If you simply want more of the hormone, its a good option. I have seen peoples results using the delivery system and not using it, and at the same mg/mg dosing, the results are not close. This is why almost every company Hi-Tech makes these hormones for is including the expensive delivery systems(Cyclosome, SEDDS, Liposomal)
 
Afi140

Afi140

Legend
Awards
4
  • Best Answer
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Established
Understandable. Just wanted to get the point across that this is still a very legit product.
 
VaughnTrue

VaughnTrue

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Understandable. Just wanted to get the point across that this is still a very legit product.
Didn't mean to come across as being negative against the product itself, my bad.

I do commend them big time for including such a large dose. This stuff is not cheap.
 
The_Old_Guy

The_Old_Guy

Well-known member
Awards
0
10g of 1-AD raw powder can be had for ~$37 retail to the average snuffy. That's about a month (9,900g at 330mg/Day). That was just a quick search, maybe it can be had cheaper. I'm sure you guys are doing a looooooooooot better than that on pricing. Expensive? More than Creatine, yeah :D
 

AEO

New member
Awards
0
Do you really NEED an Estrogen blocker with Andro the Giant stack?
 
The_Old_Guy

The_Old_Guy

Well-known member
Awards
0
Do you really NEED an Estrogen blocker with Andro the Giant stack?
"Need" is subjective. Is it possible that even 2 step DHEAs can cause breast tissue problems? Yes. Likely? Heck no. I would say you "Need" to have some Aromasin (Exemestane) on the shelf "Always", but do not take any AI on cycle unless you see problems, or your bloodwork tells you there is one. Then, break the seal on the Aromasin. This applies only to the legal DHEAs, other compounds can require on-cycle AI's.
 

Similar threads


Top