Anyone used this? and does it require a PCT?
It says you don't have to do a PCT, I can understand when it was using formestane it could cause slight suppression but they've used something else here that doesn't unless it's in higher dosesinstead, after using it you have to take a pct I read that suppresses the natural hormone production
Nice find.I dont understand how a company would release this and the liver issues are scary too.
Here is a great price for the pills http://www.nutraplanet.com/products/muscle-addiction/eradicate-e.htmlabout the liver, do not think it could have a big impact on it, as it is a transdermal, the cytadren cited in the article was in tablets (oral)
but side effects such as: Dizziness, Depression, Thyroid problems, Flu-like symptoms, Emotional problems, Decrease in Endurance, Huge problems in bed ..... are hardly encouraging
I do not think it's worth a try, also because it is not a suicidal AI, so once use is discontinued, you have very high estrogen. This will lead to nasty side effects like gynecomastia, high blood pressure, low libido ....
and cortisol that shoots through the roof !!! ......
the formestane was much better, (like the old form stanzol, and even better the formeron), which with lower doses were not very suppressiv ... and they were both suicidal AI !!
I not long ago, I bought the e-bolish, (transdermal arimistane). I want to try in my next stack to see if a conversion enzyme of the compound through the skin is more effective than regular arimistane (Erase capsules)
not suppressiv, very good for pct, keeps low cortisol and you can also use standalone ...
It is also used as the active ingredient in the sublingual MHO Poppers by Forged. It does work to lower e2 and cortisol , but those potential side effects make it not worth it IMO.Nice find.I dont understand how a company would release this and the liver issues are scary too.
you should have changed the name, imo!!!The new ingredient....
Cyclohexylaminoglutethimide is a highly potent nonsteroidal, non-suppressive, selective aromatase inhibitor that is more potent than our original ingredient, Formestane.
The active ingredient is not cytadren
They're different compounds again dude. In this case, it won't function like a cyclodextrin complex. It is a unique compound with its own dataThese days, some companies are attempting to put out a “supplement” version of cytadren (aminoglutethimide) by using cyclohexylaminoglutethimide in their supplements, which is a terrible and dangerous idea.
Here is the chemical formula of aminoglutethimide (cytadren) vs. cyclohexylaminoglutethimide (supplement):
Cytadren: 3-(4-aminophenyl)-3-ethyl-piperidine-2,6-dione
Supplements: 3-(4-aminophenyl)-3-cyclohexyl-piperidine-2,6-dione)
Essentially, these new supplements are cyclodextrin based versions of cytadren, which will lead to very serious side effects for the users.
when I saw this new version at Orbit I thought "hell yes Formestane is back!" But then I thought how, with the ban? Saw the ingredients and thought WTF is this? Further research left me with the same question: WTF?you should have changed the name, imo!!! this could be misleading to those thinking it is a formestane product!!!
Nothing to do with formestane, but no, I'm not going to repeat it again, IT IS NOT a base of cytadren with cyclodextrin. It is a different compound. Look it up, there's data on it. It's a cousin of cytadren but much weaker and more selective for aromatase. It is not simply dextrocyclized cytadren. If you want to keep believing this, I can't help youor rather, we can say that the cyclohexyl-aminoglutethimide is a fancy version of the same aminoglutethimide. but the pharmacological function of the compound is still the same
and has absolutely nothing to do with the formestane
It IS a cousin of AG but much weaker. I believe 24x less but I would have to go back and look again.a cousin of cytadren, much weaker and more selective for aromatase?
bravo, this agrees with what I said before, that the compound, is been reworked to be weaker and more selective. for this I ask you now:
you truly believe their statements when they say that it is not suppressiv and that requires no pct?
Be honest ...
Where did you say this before? You kept saying it's just cytadren with a cyclodextrin delivery system, which it isn't.a cousin of cytadren, much weaker and more selective for aromatase?
bravo, this agrees with what I said before, that the compound, is been reworked to be weaker and more selective. for this I ask you now:
you truly believe their statements when they say that it is not suppressiv and that requires no pct?
Be honest ...
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Forma Stanzol v3 | Supplements | 1 | ||
Osta + Transaderm + Forma Stanzol 6 week recomp | Anabolics | 12 | ||
Is Forma Stanzol V3 good for PCT or suppressive? | Anabolics | 2 | ||
formastanzol v3....worth it? thinking of animal test explosion stack.. | Supplements | 6 | ||
Forma stanzol sufficient? | Cycle Logs | 8 |