old erase pro vs new erase pro

  1. onebabooze808's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  105 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    114
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    94.07%

    old erase pro vs new erase pro


    I noticed the 2 formulas r completely different. Whats the difference between the two and what r the pros/cons for both? Which would u recommend?

  2. New Member
    nidhogg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    78
    Rep Power
    29901
    Level
    11
    Lv. Percent
    56.97%

    New one has dehydroabetic acid as an AI instead of arimistane.

    Get the old one if you can atleast until more anecdotal evidence pop in. I have used the old formula on cycle with success and definitely dont want to risk it with the new one
  3. Board Sponsor
    brundel's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,528
    Rep Power
    883505
    Level
    64
    Lv. Percent
    94.29%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting Pro

    Does anyone have access to the studies that indicate dehydroabetic acid is a viable AI.
    Ive been researching AI's for a decade now and IM always interested in new studies. Maybe a PES rep can help or anyone if you know which studies there are. I dont mind if its just abstracts I have access to most places I would need to get the full texts.
    I wonder how strong it is compared to something like exemestane for example?
    BLACK LION RESEARCH Supplements for bodybuilder FOLLIDRONE- The king of natural anabolics.
    •   
       

  4. Senior Member
    aaronuconn's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  182 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,475
    Rep Power
    1846358
    Level
    58
    Lv. Percent
    88.27%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by brundel View Post
    Does anyone have access to the studies that indicate dehydroabetic acid is a viable AI. Ive been researching AI's for a decade now and IM always interested in new studies. Maybe a PES rep can help or anyone if you know which studies there are. I dont mind if its just abstracts I have access to most places I would need to get the full texts. I wonder how strong it is compared to something like exemestane for example?
    May want to check the PES subforum. I believe Cooper did a write up upon its release.
    PES - Physique Enhancing Science
  5. Elite Member
    bolt10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    8,715
    Rep Power
    3946707
    Level
    82
    Lv. Percent
    73.77%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityActivity VeteranPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by onebabooze808 View Post
    I noticed the 2 formulas r completely different. Whats the difference between the two and what r the pros/cons for both? Which would u recommend?
    New Erase/Erase Pro contains this as the main active: Abieta-8,11,13-trien-18-oic acid

    In conjunction with: Uncaria Tomentosa Extract

    Erase Pro still contains the B. Diffusa extract though.
    PES Representative
    Don't miss out on the next deal:
    http://pescience.com/insider
    Protein Backed by Science: http://selectprotein.com
  6. Elite Member
    Driven2lift's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"   lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Age
    25
    Posts
    6,186
    Rep Power
    7152021
    Level
    94
    Lv. Percent
    39.23%
    Achievements Activity RoyaltyActivity AuthorityActivity ProActivity VeteranPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by onebabooze808 View Post
    I noticed the 2 formulas r completely different. Whats the difference between the two and what r the pros/cons for both? Which would u recommend?
    Is this for a solo run or as part of a PCT

    Speaking solely from experience having used both for 8-week runs now, I and many others will note that the original formula is noticed working faster, because it should dry you out, this is ideal at the end of a cut to really bring out definition and also assist with final bits of stubborn fat loss.

    The new formula was received with a lot of skepticism because this quick drying effect isn't noticed, and some users seemed to think this meant it was less effective. Not the case of course, the formula was changed and so has the effects in turn. I found less drying out with the new formula although this means less joint discomfort which was an issue noted by some with the original.
    Over the course of my 8 weeks what I did notice was improved fat-loss, particularly from my stubborn areas (abdominals, love handles) without adding cardio I managed to shed weight in those areas that had previously been much more stubborn. Of course this was alongside a strict diet (slight deficit) and weight training.

    Overall I think the new formulation is better to help you achieve your goals and aid the process where the original may shine more when you are already very lean and want to make that dry aesthetic difference.

    Hope that helps!
    Athletix Representative
    Orbit Nutrition Representative;
    Use the code SOCIAL for 10% off your order at Orbit!
  7. onebabooze808's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  105 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    114
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    94.07%

    Quote Originally Posted by Driven2lift View Post
    Is this for a solo run or as part of a PCT

    Speaking solely from experience having used both for 8-week runs now, I and many others will note that the original formula is noticed working faster, because it should dry you out, this is ideal at the end of a cut to really bring out definition and also assist with final bits of stubborn fat loss.

    The new formula was received with a lot of skepticism because this quick drying effect isn't noticed, and some users seemed to think this meant it was less effective. Not the case of course, the formula was changed and so has the effects in turn. I found less drying out with the new formula although this means less joint discomfort which was an issue noted by some with the original.
    Over the course of my 8 weeks what I did notice was improved fat-loss, particularly from my stubborn areas (abdominals, love handles) without adding cardio I managed to shed weight in those areas that had previously been much more stubborn. Of course this was alongside a strict diet (slight deficit) and weight training.

    Overall I think the new formulation is better to help you achieve your goals and aid the process where the original may shine more when you are already very lean and want to make that dry aesthetic difference.

    Hope that helps!
    Thanx! So pretty much the old formula is better for drying u out then and the new ones better for fatloss?
  8. Senior Member
    Synapsin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,073
    Rep Power
    1540615
    Level
    56
    Lv. Percent
    47.01%
    Achievements Posting ProActivity Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by onebabooze808 View Post
    Thanx! So pretty much the old formula is better for drying u out then and the new ones better for fatloss?
    Somewhat, yes. The new one should also be better on your joints, and will result in more noticeable results. The new version has novel ingredients and is a worthy successor to the previous version.
    PES
    http://pescience.com/insider
    http://facebook.com/pescience
  9. onebabooze808's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  105 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    114
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    94.07%

    Thanx brah
  10. Senior Member
    Synapsin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,073
    Rep Power
    1540615
    Level
    56
    Lv. Percent
    47.01%
    Achievements Posting ProActivity Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by onebabooze808 View Post
    Thanx brah
    No problem at all man. Let us know if you have any other questions.
    PES
    http://pescience.com/insider
    http://facebook.com/pescience
  11. onebabooze808's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  105 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    114
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    94.07%

    Quote Originally Posted by Synapsin View Post
    No problem at all man. Let us know if you have any other questions.
    Shoots
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Old erase pro vs new erase pro
    By superbodz in forum Supplements
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-05-2014, 07:06 AM
  2. new erase pro vs the old one
    By dbernardo3 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 01-25-2014, 05:15 PM
  3. Old Iforce Dexaprine VS New Iforce Dexaprine?
    By AdelV in forum Supplements
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-07-2012, 11:54 AM
  4. old school training vs new
    By greekgeorge in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-09-2011, 01:30 AM
  5. old jungle warfare vs. new jungle warfare ?
    By ReaperX in forum Supplements
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 03-13-2008, 02:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in