natural supplement debate

[kingdong]

I wrote this in another thread, and figured Id copy and paste it to create some debate:

We all have a different definition of natural. Under my definition, if you are taking something that was created in a lab, and not just for the purpose of making something natural more absorbable, it might not make you juiced, but it also takes away a persons natural bragging rights. Example: most of the popular AI's

[triton185]

As I said in the other thread, I would say natural is no AAS or PH use. But I see your point about AI's, but I look at them as helping your body produce more test rather than taking the place of test....hope that made sense.

[JN230]

well i know many peopel that would call products like testopro, or phyto-test as natural, others call DHEA products like dermacrine and others, as natural,

[JN230]

would you consider a supplement like natadrol or 1-t as natural?

[kingdong]

Natadrol looks as natural as it gets to me. I have no information on the origins of 1-t, so I just don't know.

[rochabp]

well steroids originated from plants (i think) so technically steroids are natural

[kingdong]

Ill expand my definition:I also don't consider roids natural, although Ill give something like hormone replacement more of a pass than the weird chemicals like deca or tren.

[A_I_Sports_Nutrition]

well i know many peopel that would call products like testopro, or phyto-test as natural, others call DHEA products like dermacrine and others, as natural,

Both of these products are totally natural.

[kingdong]

Agreed. DHEA is natural. Demicrine, not so sure. I think it might have a synthetic AI, but I could be wrong.