Time to kick it up a notch, help me plan my PH mega cycle :)

  1. New Member
    CrzyLifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    115
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    60.66%

    Exclamation Time to kick it up a notch, help me plan my PH mega cycle :)


    Ok, here was my last cycle

    SD 20mg
    SD 20mg
    SD 30mg Mega TRN 2mg
    SD 40mg Mega TRN 6mg
    Mega TRN 8mg

    proper pct and support, didnt gain as much as i hoped, about 8lbs total, diet was 5000cals and so on, some ppl just dont respond well to sd i guess.

    so heres my planning for my next cycle-

    what i have
    Pmax (2)
    Methyl XT
    Propadrol
    Mega TRN (1/2 bottle)

    i want to run a decent cycle. please dont lecture me aboout methyls, i know about it, im not some newb. i believe the danger is greatly over stated.

    my cycle so far-

    Methyl XT 60mg Propadrol 60mg
    Methyl XT 60mg Propadrol 60mg
    Methyl XT 60mg Propadrol 60mg
    Methyl XT 60mg Propadrol 60mg
    Hdrol 50mg or Havoc at 30-40mg
    Hdrol 50mg
    Hdrol 50mg
    Hdrol 50mg

    dont know what to put here, i would like to add in maybe Havoc or Hdrol for 4 more week after this. i dont wanna use the Pmax because of BP issues.

    not to insane, what do you all think?

    thanks

  2. New Member
    haroldjg's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    415
    Rep Power
    302
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    52.84%

    I think it looks like it would be a really good stack. As far as hdrol or havoc is concerned, it depends on what your wanting to do. For me havoc seems like it is a better bulker than a cutter or hardener. So if you were looking to put on a few more pounds at this point I would use the havoc, otherwise I would go with the Hdrol. Of course, you could always throw in some of that juicy trn..... Another point to consider is that methyl xt converts to M1T... I never used M1T but I have heard a lot of stories of gyno with it. Considering this, it could be a better idea to use the havoc and just throw in some of the TRN. of course everyone reacts differently, so if you are not someone that is gyno prone then you dont need to worry about it.
  3. New Member
    CrzyLifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    115
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    60.66%

    Quote Originally Posted by haroldjg View Post
    I think it looks like it would be a really good stack. As far as hdrol or havoc is concerned, it depends on what your wanting to do. For me havoc seems like it is a better bulker than a cutter or hardener. So if you were looking to put on a few more pounds at this point I would use the havoc, otherwise I would go with the Hdrol. Of course, you could always throw in some of that juicy trn..... Another point to consider is that methyl xt converts to M1T... I never used M1T but I have heard a lot of stories of gyno with it. Considering this, it could be a better idea to use the havoc and just throw in some of the TRN. of course everyone reacts differently, so if you are not someone that is gyno prone then you dont need to worry about it.
    thanks alot for the response bro

    im 6'1 and 290lbs...~20%bf most would estimate. not looking to cut...i LOVE bulking

    so Havoc it is, that should also dry me out a bit at the end of the cycle which would be nice.

    im not to keen on the trn, mostly just strength gains, not much mass. and my BP was 170/100 while on...not looking forward to that. i dont think gyno will be an issue either
    •   
       

  4. Elite Member
    jmh80's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,110
    Rep Power
    9663
    Level
    57
    Lv. Percent
    88.53%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by CrzyLifter View Post
    i want to run a decent cycle. please dont lecture me aboout methyls, i know about it, im not some newb. i believe the danger is greatly over stated.
    Well - there goes my response.

    BTW - vet (or whatever) does not equal smart.
  5. New Member
    zipzz92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11
    Rep Power
    102
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    7.5%

    Cycle is too damn long if you ask me
  6. New Member
    CrzyLifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    115
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    60.66%

    Quote Originally Posted by zipzz92 View Post
    Cycle is too damn long if you ask me
    too long? lol, i dont think so. longer cycle= better gain retention
  7. New Member
    CrzyLifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    115
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    60.66%

    im wondering if i should just use the Pmax i have. im concerned about BP being an issue, any advice?
  8. New Member
    haroldjg's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    415
    Rep Power
    302
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    52.84%

    Quote Originally Posted by CrzyLifter View Post
    im wondering if i should just use the Pmax i have. im concerned about BP being an issue, any advice?
    Pmax for the entire cycle length or just for the post propadrol section?
  9. New Member
    CrzyLifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    115
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    60.66%

    Quote Originally Posted by haroldjg View Post
    Pmax for the entire cycle length or just for the post propadrol section?
    post prop, sorry for the confusion.


    ok, heres another idea i had-

    Transdermal PP. Would it work to open up a capsule of PP, mix it with an amount of DMSO (transdermal delivery topical) and apply to skin? i have heard of this and it sounds interesting. thus avoiding the liver taxing.

    good or no?
  10. Board Sponsor
    Rodja's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  220 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    23,580
    Rep Power
    1215363
    Level
    93
    Lv. Percent
    68.81%
    Achievements Activity RoyaltyActivity VeteranActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by CrzyLifter View Post
    post prop, sorry for the confusion.


    ok, heres another idea i had-

    Transdermal PP. Would it work to open up a capsule of PP, mix it with an amount of DMSO (transdermal delivery topical) and apply to skin? i have heard of this and it sounds interesting. thus avoiding the liver taxing.

    good or no?
    It is pointless to use an oral as a transdermal. The purpose of the 17a is for oral bioavailability.
    M.Ed. Ex Phys
    Performax Labs Product Specialist

  11. New Member
    CrzyLifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    115
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    60.66%

    Quote Originally Posted by Rodja View Post
    It is pointless to use an oral as a transdermal. The purpose of the 17a is for oral bioavailability.
    i know this, however i have heard of it being done with PP, to bypass the liver. anywho, just an idea
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-03-2012, 07:52 PM
  2. Something to take it up at notch!
    By Will Wagner in forum Supplements
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-29-2010, 03:50 AM
  3. Kicking it up a notch with ECA
    By Stallion83 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-10-2009, 02:23 PM
  4. Obama Kicks It Up A Notch !!!
    By anabolicrhino in forum News and Articles
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-27-2007, 01:33 PM
  5. Hilary Kicks It Up A Notch !!!
    By anabolicrhino in forum Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-20-2007, 08:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in