Genetics playing a role in growth with or without gear

  1. Registered User
    Irish Cannon's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"   lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    27
    Posts
    12,615
    Rep Power
    74316

    Genetics playing a role in growth with or without gear


    Would it be safe to say that even with gear, genetics play the biggest role in how you grow? My last cycle I ran pretty high doses of test, and moderate dose of tren (150mg prop ed/50mg tren ed -11 weeks). Even with those doses my body can't seem to grow too well. I don't think my body is made to be at a high weight. I have to work my ass off to maintain what I have right now and it's not even that much. I'm 5'8, 190 lbs and about 9% bf. I have a real hard time getting any higher with or without gear.

  2. Gold Member
    glenihan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Age
    31
    Posts
    3,679
    Rep Power
    1961

    absolutely without question .. i know that former pro phil hernon ran 5-600mg of test with 400mg of deca and 300mg of eq .. that's 1200ish mg and he was an absolute shredded monster

    i truly believe most pros are like this .. part of their genetic make up is a mega response to gear
  3. Gold Member
    glenihan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Age
    31
    Posts
    3,679
    Rep Power
    1961

    oh and you need to let your body fat get up to 11 or 12 its much easier to gain muscle
    •   
       

  4. Banned
    pistonpump's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  225 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Hawaii Nei
    Age
    30
    Posts
    12,114
    Rep Power
    0

    Quote Originally Posted by glenihan

    i truly believe most pros are like this .. part of their genetic make up is a mega response to gear
    ..and better response to exercise.

    I agree not much if any of the huge pros out there have bad genetics as far as responding. Shape and symmetry is different. But, I sometimes wonder what it is that their ancestors did to make such good muscular genetics. I for one would say I have fairly good genetics for legs, brains, teeth, and wang lol but upper body genetics just arent there.
  5. Snuggle Club™ mascot
    bpmartyr's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  175 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    At the buffet
    Age
    41
    Posts
    4,448
    Rep Power
    27397

    I'm in the same boat Irish. If only muscle came on at a fraction of the rate that fat does.
    Recent log:http://anabolicminds.com/forum/supplement-reviews-logs/213350-lean-efx-refined.html
  6. Registered User
    stxnas's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    33
    Posts
    9,977
    Rep Power
    969163

    I used to work in a gym with a guy who competed. He was 5'8 @ 244lbs and said he didn't use gear until about 195lbs. When I last saw him he was pinning ALL THE TIME and had thrown HGH into the mix b/c he could not get past 244lbs. He got so disgusted with being at that weight that he started eating fast food everyday b/c he would have been happy to add ANY weight, fat or muscle.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-30-2007, 04:41 AM
  2. Vitamin D may play a role in autoimmune diseases
    By yeahright in forum Supplements
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-06-2006, 11:04 PM
  3. IGF, with or without aas
    By FullyBuilt in forum IGF-1/GH
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-01-2004, 04:03 PM
  4. UCP1, with or without food?
    By FullyBuilt in forum Supplements
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-14-2003, 11:40 AM
  5. T-1 pro, take with or without creatine?
    By INFLUENCER in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-02-2003, 09:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in