Torn between AAS/PH
- 05-21-2006, 11:55 PM
- 05-21-2006, 11:58 PM
run a search...this has been discussed a lot.
True AAS is going to be safer and proven every single time.
05-22-2006, 12:13 AM
Test at a normal level is no doubt safer than pheraplex. There is plenty of proven research on it to show what it does to you. Pheraplex is an oral that is going to put MUCH more of a strain on your liver than test will. Test you can run much longer which many will believe can help you keep more gains. Being on for 12weeks opposed to 4weeks can usually lead to more gains. You make the choice, this is all my opinion on the subject, others may disagree.
05-22-2006, 12:26 AM
05-22-2006, 12:31 AM
For some reason I still have the whole "legal" scenario running through my head. This sucks because it's my health on the line here.
Anywho, I'm not planning on running either or any of the like any time soon. I was just wondering how some of you felt. Sorry for the meaningless post.
05-22-2006, 01:22 AM
05-22-2006, 01:27 AM
I say stack em!
I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper. I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.
05-22-2006, 01:29 AM
05-22-2006, 02:15 AM
i think i was using bunk gear, but i recieved better gains off of pp than test for 12 weeks. it was QV test if that tells you anything; still though i would opt for the test. it seems the wiser choice assuming yours wasnt bunk.
05-22-2006, 02:51 AM
Something about test, it gives you a feeling nothing else can, lol, no, not rage, but this feeling of well being, tranquility and determination. That is one thing that is great about it.
Similar Forum Threads
- By baham99 in forum Cycle InfoReplies: 7Last Post: 09-23-2006, 11:22 AM
- By pcn in forum AnabolicsReplies: 3Last Post: 02-01-2005, 03:06 PM
- By Wolfe08 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 4Last Post: 01-16-2005, 11:35 PM
- By morfiend in forum AnabolicsReplies: 0Last Post: 05-17-2004, 11:24 PM
- By size in forum General ChatReplies: 13Last Post: 12-03-2003, 09:32 PM