I want to do a short, not fully suppressive cycle with a serm. Firstly wanted to do SD at 10 - 15mg but now I've seen a study, that had quite favourable results. It was done with andarol - patients were given 100mg's of anadrol (50 twice a day) for 24 weeks. What's surprising is that TT levels dropped app 50% in 24 weeks time. Also enzymes weren't terribly elevated. Here's a link to that study.
So what do you think? SD at 10 - 15 or Anadrol at 50? I still want to avoid 19nor's, never done them before, but if anadrol is so unsuppressive then I just might give it a shot.
I've read some discouraging opinions on anadrol only cycles though, that you loose like 70% of your gains. My point here is to bulk up - and keep - somewhere between 5 - 10 pounds of tissue, so this would kinda defeat the purpose of the cycle if I lost 70% of it...
SD is cheaper though and also don't need caber. But price really isn't an issue, just the prolactin part. Never taken caber either, but I hear you get really horny from it, which is a very welcomed side for me.
Btw, I am 191 at 12&bf now. Still most probably well in my natty limits...
So what do you think? SD at 10 - 15 or Anadrol at 50? I still want to avoid 19nor's, never done them before, but if anadrol is so unsuppressive then I just might give it a shot.
I've read some discouraging opinions on anadrol only cycles though, that you loose like 70% of your gains. My point here is to bulk up - and keep - somewhere between 5 - 10 pounds of tissue, so this would kinda defeat the purpose of the cycle if I lost 70% of it...
SD is cheaper though and also don't need caber. But price really isn't an issue, just the prolactin part. Never taken caber either, but I hear you get really horny from it, which is a very welcomed side for me.
Btw, I am 191 at 12&bf now. Still most probably well in my natty limits...