Anabolic Xtreme - Ergomax LMG?!
- 07-03-2005, 03:06 PM
- 07-03-2005, 03:21 PM
07-03-2005, 03:26 PM
07-03-2005, 04:32 PM
07-03-2005, 04:52 PM
If this is true, as it does appear to be, then there was no need to stock up on this "final production run."
07-03-2005, 05:08 PM
07-03-2005, 05:19 PM
the AX rep let it out ... but at the end said he wasnt supposed to release the info, tisk tisk.. lol
Last edited by size; 07-03-2005 at 09:30 PM.
07-03-2005, 05:52 PM
i am guilty of buying 2 bottles of the "last run stuff" but im not even mad bc i'll probably use it up along with the rest of my SD, m1T, 4ad, and 1ad (not all together of course) and then quit pissing around and hit the real deal....so either way im cool.. but it is good to know
i think im gonna run a cut using Ergomax and trimax with clen/ec... sound like a good cut anyone??
07-03-2005, 06:04 PM
07-03-2005, 06:19 PM
i had a feeling when they said "last run buy now" was a sales pitch non the less i'm not in a hurry anymore
07-03-2005, 06:46 PM
07-03-2005, 08:41 PM
Very interesting. This makes complete sense in regards to ALRI market policy.Originally Posted by dertynasty
They are moving towards non-methylated agents which are completely legal by the current law scrutiny.
Last edited by size; 07-03-2005 at 09:31 PM.
07-03-2005, 09:01 PM
07-03-2005, 09:11 PM
07-03-2005, 09:12 PM
07-03-2005, 09:26 PM
if he wasn't supposed to say anything and he did... ****, that could cost AX the whole deal with ALRI... and AX LOTS of money. i'm sure AX was supposed to keep this quiet to let ALRI get all the last run sales they could, and now with this info out, it could seriously hurt sales. i have no pity for this guy, you gotta shut your mouth with stuff like this.
07-03-2005, 09:31 PM
07-03-2005, 10:36 PM
That might be true, but it also did appear that he was unaware that it was a "shut your mouth" situation by his posts. With that being said, i no longer feel the need to stock up.Originally Posted by not_big_enuf
07-03-2005, 10:47 PM
07-04-2005, 11:24 AM
oh well I like AX. If they got the rights, good for them..... I don't know why they would though, unless they got it on the cheap. They already got Phera-Plex from DS, which isn't that far off Ergomax (SUPPOSEDLY).
07-04-2005, 11:52 AM
I don't mind AX and all, but why can't they be innovative instead of buying other companys supplements?
07-04-2005, 12:06 PM
Well, with Trimax, maybe.
My initial feeling to repond no is based on the fact that Ergomax puts on quality pounds. It is best used when calories are at maint and above IMO and therefore is somewhat lesser suited for a cut.
Of course, with Trimax, it may be a good way to keep muscle while stripping fat; I'm sure that's your idea.
Still, I personally would not use Ergomax in a cut.[/QUOTG]
Why? Any anabolic can be used in a cut. It's your diet and cardio that makes a cut. You could cut on Test, Tren and Abombs if you wanted too. If Ergomax can diminsh the muscle loss while on Trimax then I would use it.
07-04-2005, 12:07 PM
Dude this compound is not innovative. Most of these compounds are not innovative. this compound has been around for say ohh 45 yearsOriginally Posted by Blown
07-04-2005, 12:21 PM
haha too much thinking involved!Originally Posted by Blown
My Little Site about Hair Loss & Anabolics-
hair loss from steroids dot com
07-04-2005, 12:41 PM
True, but if it works it works, ya know? It'd be sad to let this one die, right?Originally Posted by Blown
07-04-2005, 01:09 PM
Why? If that's what this company does to make money then that's what they do. Not everyone is into R&D. They just facilitate marketing and sales. What's wrong with doing that? It's not like they've signed on some horrible companies that produce crap. What they're bringing to the market are quality supplements.Originally Posted by Blown
07-04-2005, 01:11 PM
07-04-2005, 01:15 PM
They are simply a different business entity. They don't develop but they promote and distribute. This is no different than countless other similar business arrangements for various goods. Besides, I don't think DS and (apparently) ALRI are complaining about the licensing agreements they have with AX.Originally Posted by Blown
07-04-2005, 01:18 PM
I think the point is the effectiveness of the cutting cycle not "if" you can cut on it. If you have something else at your disposal that is more suited to cutting then why wouldn't you use it? If I had Anadrol and Winstrol would I use the Anadrol for the cut....probably not? So, if there's a choice I would go with something other than the Ergomax.Originally Posted by LCSULLA
07-04-2005, 02:12 PM
I see your point. But for me if a Ergomax/Max/Triamx/Clen produced a dramatic recomp (20lb decress in fat while putting on 10-15 lbs), then to me that is worth it's weight in gold. I mean who here doesn't want that?Originally Posted by shootmeagain
Similar Forum Threads
- By samv12 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 48Last Post: 07-15-2005, 02:29 PM
- By ChiTown72 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 3Last Post: 06-30-2005, 08:36 PM
- By shootmeagain in forum AnabolicsReplies: 5Last Post: 04-05-2005, 12:17 AM
- By Dr. Death in forum AnabolicsReplies: 7Last Post: 04-03-2005, 12:35 AM