What dose is recommended for advanced designer steroid/ SARM user. I've seen 12 and then 20 or 25 mg. Is this better bulker than LGD. Someone who's takin compound let me know.
You do have a point, but the majority of people do not want to explicitly break the law.Buy me the stuff and I'll run it that high haha would cost ALOT of money to cycle when you could just go buy a bottle of superdrol and/or test much cheaper, with much better results.
You mean 19nor steroid derivative.Realize that yk11 is a methylated dht derivative
I stand corrected lol!You mean 19nor steroid derivative.
Methyl dht derivative is a whole nother ball game.
:thumbsup:
You knew that, you were just testing us. :smoker:I stand corrected lol!
I've learned that slow and steady is definitely the better answer. But for the guys who want that instant punch like the old DS's, I would like to see how 40mg of LGD would compare for a quick 4 week kickstartI have no desire to run any sarm at a high dosage.
People are too impatient
Agreed, every one runs low doses of these sarms and gets pissed at results. If 10mg of lgd was super impressive that would mean mg-mg it's stronger then anadrol or other orals. I'm not willing to guinny pig but I'd love to see someone run 50mg lgd and see what happens
I would love to see someone run LGD or RAD at 30-60mg a day
I've learned that slow and steady is definitely the better answer. But for the guys who want that instant punch like the old DS's, I would like to see how 40mg of LGD would compare for a quick 4 week kickstart
My last (first and only) LGD run was at 8mg (that is just what dosage it was capped at). At about the 6 or 7 week mark I plateaued, it was a slow, but steady progression up until then. I planned to run it for 12 weeks, despite the plateau I stayed the course, until the end of the 10th week, then I bumped it to 16 and started seeing progress again. My next run I plan to start at 8 then move quickly up to 16, and if I plateau again at that dosage, up to 24.I couldn't imagine what the lethargy would be like on this much lgd. I probably wouldn't get out of bed lol
My last (first and only) LGD run was at 8mg (that is just what dosage it was capped at). At about the 6 or 7 week mark I plateaued, it was a slow, but steady progression up until then. I planned to run it for 12 weeks, despite the plateau I stayed the course, until the end of the 10th week, then I bumped it to 16 and started seeing progress again. My next run I plan to start at 8 then move quickly up to 16, and if I plateau again at that dosage, up to 24.
modest. I gained about 6 ~ 8 lbs lean mass, after I shed all of the water weight and extra stored glycogen. Slow and steady, nothing phenomenal. My weight only changed a couple of lbs, but my BF went down, very visible in the mirror. It ended up being more of a recomp. I think I need to up the LGD dosage and increase/clean up my food intake to really see any better gains.what were ur gains like on LGD?
I thought YK-11 was a DHT derivative?I think we're all finding out that these sarms ran at high doses (PH/DS doses) can illicit some serious results
Realize that YK11 is a methylated 19nor derivative, it's a different animal all together than LGD. Expect nice large increases in size from a moderate to high dose of LGD to Research subject, YK11 will have your research subjects skin feeling thin and muscle density drastically increases.
((17α,20E)-17,20-[(1-methoxyethylidene)bis(oxy)]-3-oxo-19-norpregna-4,20-diene-21-carboxylic acid methyl esterI thought YK-11 was a DHT derivative?
Here:Anyone ran a full cycle of YK-11? If so, with what and what were the results?
Considering it for my next cycle but it doesn't seem very cost effective.
Jebrook is logging it right now in this thread: http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-logs/295339-premier-research-essentials.html
I'm running:Seems like it doesn't carry the same progestational sides of other 19nors since it is selective. Anyone care to weigh in on that?