You guys liking Rebound XT?
- 06-04-2005, 04:01 PM
- 06-04-2005, 04:06 PM
- 06-04-2005, 05:52 PM
Originally Posted by SilentScream27
06-04-2005, 09:51 PM
Probably not, in a nutshell it's too easy a search with a LOT recent threads discussing the pros and cons of each.Originally Posted by TrainTilUDrop
06-05-2005, 09:20 AM
For PCT, for me, both work. RXT got my libido and ejaculatory volume back MUCH quicker and i felt recovered overall quicker. With nolva i felt PCT. With RXT i feel like the cycle is still going.
Stand-alone, however, nolva does pretty much nothing for me, whereas RXT boosts and strength and progression quite significantly. Even moreso when stacked with ActivaTe.
I'm gonna stop typing now cause i sound like an advert lol.
06-05-2005, 09:31 AM
Word.Originally Posted by Robboe
same effect here. had better effects on rebound/LX combo during PCT than i did with a test/tren combo. felt like the cycle had been extended for another 4 weeks.
06-05-2005, 10:09 AM
I am so impressed by RXT. It's like i'm still on cycle. I maintained all my strengh and as a matter of fact it has continued to increase. Maintained all my lean gains as well. Ran 4 weeks of SD
06-05-2005, 11:39 AM
I'm going into my 4th week of a Rebound XT/Blue Rhino stack and its like running PHs. I had some acne in weeks 2 and 3 but that was it. In the gym I have been steadily gaining, not in huge steps like with SD but more than with M4OHN. This ReboundRhino stack also shares some leaning propensities of the M4OHN. I'm not sure how effective the Rhino would be by itself being straight herbal formula, but with Rebound setting the stage and IMO, maximizing the extra test, I think I may have found the perfect off-cycle cycle.
06-05-2005, 12:03 PM
Actually I had searched quite extensively but there was still some voids and the information was scattered between a crapload of threads. Sorry about that.Originally Posted by CDB
Wow, it really sounds like Rebound is the way to go. I am going to give it a shot over the Nolva and we will see how it goes.
06-05-2005, 03:13 PM
"It tastes like... burning", Ralph Wiggum.Originally Posted by SilentScream27
06-05-2005, 08:11 PM
[QUOTE=Robboe] With RXT i feel like the cycle is still going.
my feelings as well
06-05-2005, 08:13 PM
same with me except I ran SD for 6 weeksOriginally Posted by DR X
06-05-2005, 08:39 PM
how long are you going to be running these two products? and, how much weight have you gained over the 3 weeks? thanks.Originally Posted by Dutchman
06-06-2005, 04:44 PM
I am gaining a lb a week but my diet is what's holding me back. My strength has gone up in almost every exercise, every week/day by either a couple of reps or around 10 lbs. I am very pleased with it.
I am probably going to end this in week 5 and run another SD cycle. My plans are 4 wks each for SD/PCT/Rebound+Rhino Stack.
06-06-2005, 07:10 PM
i thought i read somewhere that nolva is better than rebound xt (gaspari's novdex)
after doing a superdrol cycle, for cholestrol levels...is this correct?
06-06-2005, 07:33 PM
Please correct me if im wrong Smeton, are you implying that rebound xt is the same as Gasparis product? Thanks. Im tryiing to see if rebound is for me. I thought gasparis stuff was formestane but i could be wrong.Originally Posted by smeton_yea
06-06-2005, 07:48 PM
sup, No im not. im just saying gasparis novedex is extremely potent its basically the same as kilosportsOriginally Posted by stratvox
attack.gasparis novedex does the same job as rebound xt. I just thought i read the rebound xt is not good
for lipids after a superdrol cycle. Ive read do nolva first then do the anti-arom. experts = Dr.D, Deoudes,
06-06-2005, 08:01 PM
Novadex and Attack have less ATD than RXT, because they added another ingredient. PA seems to think that the other ingredient is worthless, and you are getting less of what actually works (the ATD) with Novadex and Attack.
06-06-2005, 08:06 PM
your not seeing the big picture.... im specifically talking about a superdrol cycle.
does rebound xt or any anti-aromatase harmful to lipids after a superdrol cycle?
i read for pct (superdrol) do nolva then transition into rebound.
06-06-2005, 08:17 PM
You're correct. Do as you just said.Originally Posted by smeton_yea
06-07-2005, 12:25 AM
Originally Posted by lifted
As far as I know RXT is a steroidal inhibitor and does not have any effect on Cholesterol while something like armidex is a non-steroidal inhibitor and won't allow any Cholesterol recovery. If that's true, RXT would be fine for PCT.
06-07-2005, 12:35 AM
You can't state that as fact because it is a proprietary blend. No one knows how much ATD Novadex has except Bruce Kneller, dip****. Stop lying.Originally Posted by SilentScream27
And just because PA says something does not make that statement true.
06-07-2005, 02:17 AM
hey, you wanna calm down a little bit?Originally Posted by James007
Bruce didn't say otherwise when PA made the assertion. Rather, they argued about the merits of the other ingredient (the name of which escapes me at the moment).
06-07-2005, 02:25 AM
3-OHAT. I think the consensus is that ATD is to be taken 3 times a day to keep test levels stable, and Bruce claims the addition of 3-OHAT only required once daily dosing.
If you see PAâ€™s posts theyâ€™re all attacks on Kneller or Llewellyn.
06-07-2005, 02:47 AM
I am not part of that consensus. Test levels aren't stable to begin with, they fluctuate dramatically in a day, and between days (with intra-daily fluctuation being relevant here).Originally Posted by James007
Most hormonal production occurs at nighttime, while sleeping, which is why RXT (and pretty much all AIs to my knowledge) are preferentially dosed before bed.
Either way, we have seen test results of between 1500 and 2000+ng/dl of test on both RXT and Novadex XT, so I'm sure both well. It has yet to be determined which works better.
06-07-2005, 03:17 AM
Can you show me the blood tests from RXT that show between 1500 and 2000 ng/dl? I'm sure they exist, but I didn't see them and would be curious.Originally Posted by SilentScream27
Your argument that they fluctuate dramatically is a crock of ****. Everything fluctuates dramatically, especially the wind and temperature. Hey, it's cooler at night. Did you know that? I wonder why.. Everything is relative. So do we want stable test levels or not? If BK says 3-OHAT creates MORE stable test levels and he has evidence to prove it then good for him. Let him put it in his product and sell it and show the consumer the evidence. I think the trials are running right now.
To beet, AI's at night can take a toll on your sleep cycle. I don't think the benefits outweigh the rewards in this regard. I'd rather have good sleep than get any slight benefit from estrogen peaking at night and reasoning this is the time to take an steroidal AI.
06-07-2005, 11:04 AM
Oh, well then I'm not sure then. That's what I thought from reading everybody's bloodowrk. May just wanna ask sledge directly smeton.Originally Posted by mb27
Similar Forum Threads
- By spatch in forum General ChatReplies: 7Last Post: 11-02-2005, 02:47 PM
- By strongurche in forum AnabolicsReplies: 5Last Post: 05-01-2005, 09:05 PM
- By sifu in forum AnabolicsReplies: 30Last Post: 11-24-2003, 02:28 PM
- By spike1205 in forum General ChatReplies: 7Last Post: 03-27-2003, 12:09 AM