RAD or LGD for pure strength?

[tyga tyga]

I'm thinking of running something since I haven't in a while. What's better for pure strength? Don't care for size

Thanks gents

 

[T-Bone]

Haven't run either but I don't think any SARM is gonna be good for strength.

 

[Joedoubledose]

Id recommend lgd for 8 weeks

 

[CJNator]

I'd assume the most androgenic one would be best with a great strength training program(don't know any). Just don't use GW, it isn't good for strength or may even decrease it(for some, not all). So IMO RAD and MK677 or just RAD/MK677 solo if it would be your first time using one. MK677 isn't a SARM but is usually grouped into the category.

 

[mountainman33]

T-Bone hit the nail on this one. SARMs aren't really "pure strength" compounds. You'll see both strength and size, but SARMs aren't known for gigantic strength increases. If you want that you'll have to go the PH/AAS route. GW is for fast loss and increased endurance, though it's not actually a SARM. Neither is MK 677, that is a GH secretagogue. So that will also help with some size, but generally it'll produce greatly enhanced recovery.

 

[Burnfire]

anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/273264-lgd-4033-results.html

He for some good strength