S
Spanner
New member
- Awards
- 0
I am aware of the nature of both and I have been researching for a while now.
I understand that many do not rate Andriol in terms of effect but I am considering it due to availability , very mild lipid effect, low aromatisation, mild hpta disruption, and lack of liver toxicity.
I had been considering Ostarine until it now transpires that it will suppress, is liver toxic, has a poor effect on lipids and that it may not be as specific as first claimed.
It seems that an effective dose of Andriol is 240-400mg per day and that a PCT would be advised as standard and most side effects similar to all testosterone a are possible.
My question is: how might these compare in terms of adding mass over a 6 week cycle both at optimal dosing or even the TRT dose of 160mg Andriol?
Much obliged
I understand that many do not rate Andriol in terms of effect but I am considering it due to availability , very mild lipid effect, low aromatisation, mild hpta disruption, and lack of liver toxicity.
I had been considering Ostarine until it now transpires that it will suppress, is liver toxic, has a poor effect on lipids and that it may not be as specific as first claimed.
It seems that an effective dose of Andriol is 240-400mg per day and that a PCT would be advised as standard and most side effects similar to all testosterone a are possible.
My question is: how might these compare in terms of adding mass over a 6 week cycle both at optimal dosing or even the TRT dose of 160mg Andriol?
Much obliged