Just trying to see what some of you have run this thought of it? The split of 10/10 is poorly designed but I was curious what kind of results you guys might have seen, sides, doses, etc.
22.5/10Very surprised nobody has anything to say about this. 20/10 would have been a much better split for sure. Even 30/10
I'd run 112.5/50. LOL22.5/10
Lol
For that perfect 90/40
Lol just to be a dink and ruin my nicely rounded numbersI'd run 112.5/50. LOL
My rats are already up to 60 ha. Literally zero sides. Thinking it's pretty underdosed.That is a crappy split
Thinking of running it at 40?
Week 4 at 60 not much noticed?My rats are already up to 60 ha. Literally zero sides. Thinking it's pretty underdosed. Strength has been going up slowly, weight is completely steady at 1600cals psmf with a refeed weekend every other weekend, no real pump benefits tho and zero lethargy or back pumps which really surprises me. Week 4 I believe.
This is exactly the protocol The rats have been following.But to Boone, IML was always legit so
As long as you can work with the split amounts, we've seen plenty of epi/tren runs before
Tren wont be high enough to need heavy P control IMO unless you are susceptible
E should be fine with an OTC but as always have one on hand
BP should be watched
I'd kick it off a week at 30 and ramp it up maybe
That's the direction I'm headed as well... pretty much been adding a cap a week.Ummm I'm running it now. I take 4 caps in AM and 4 in afternoon. Might go to 9 total honestly.
I'm a bit excessive maybe but that doesn't mean it's not a good dose
1600 calories- screw that!My rats are already up to 60 ha. Literally zero sides. Thinking it's pretty underdosed.
Strength has been going up slowly, weight is completely steady at 1600cals psmf with a refeed weekend every other weekend, no real pump benefits tho and zero lethargy or back pumps which really surprises me. Week 4 I believe.
It's actually not that bad. I've incorporated a modified IF style so my evening meals are pretty big even with the low cals. I honestly felt worse wheni was on osta before this cycle than I do currently with 800 less cals, no carbs, and what should be stronger and more lethargy causing compounds1600 calories- screw that!
Ummm yeah. A supposed 90mg of Epistane. Definitely under dosed.Ummm I'm running it now. I take 4 caps in AM and 4 in afternoon. Might go to 9 total honestly.
I'm a bit excessive maybe but that doesn't mean it's not a good dose
This was my exact thought ha. Currently at 60... feels like less than the 30 I've experienced before. At 90 you better have some back pumps or im calling bs.Ummm yeah. A supposed 90mg of Epistane. Definitely under dosed.
That was my original plan as well... Just run it based on the epi and have the tren just be there for whatever minimal benefit it might provide.I figured I could run it at standard Epi dose and have Tren underdosed..... Or run it at a decent Tren Dose and see what happens at super-sized Epi doses..
Keep me updated ha. I'm headed that wayJust started 9/day today
Yep. That's been the whole point of this thread. Seems like these are either waaaayyyyy underdosed or not what they say.9 a day!?!
I gathered... sad to see man. Drummy had a bunk experience with iml halo too....Yep. That's been the whole point of this thread. Seems like these are either waaaayyyyy underdosed or not what they say.
Drummy? Not familiar with that name. When? Any log/info?I gathered... sad to see man. Drummy had a bunk experience with iml halo too....
Side effects is a poor indicator of compound potency. Keep hammering away brother.heavyiron any thoughts on why we're having to run such crazy doses here?
duplicateheavyiron any thoughts on why we're having to run such crazy doses here?
How much of a calorie deficit are you in daily with the 1,600 cals? 600-700?My rats are already up to 60 ha. Literally zero sides. Thinking it's pretty underdosed.
Strength has been going up slowly, weight is completely steady at 1600cals psmf with a refeed weekend every other weekend, no real pump benefits tho and zero lethargy or back pumps which really surprises me. Week 4 I believe.
I have been gaining strength to some extent and maintaining weight, however I just find it odd that it took 6+ caps to achieve that... And to be side free as well at that dose is unheard of.How much of a calorie deficit are you in daily with the 1,600 cals? 600-700?
I would think gaining strength is going to pretty tough in that steep of a deficit.
Yes, I know exactly what I'm doing with my diet as I'v done this without any supps before as well. Strength loss has always been an issue in a cut for me and almost regardless of the deficit level the loss is consistent.Have you calculated your calorie deficit? It looks to be significant. Nutrition ALWAYS drives the goal, not the sups brother.
The products are properly dosed. I can assure you that is not the problem brother.Yes, I know exactly what I'm doing with my diet as I'v done this without any supps before as well. Strength loss has always been an issue in a cut for me and almost regardless of the deficit level the loss is consistent.
My question is not based around if the compounds work or not. They do. My question is around the fact that we are having to megadose to see the expected results... thus why my analysis is that these are severely underdosed.
... I've already established its not my diet. I know exactly what both my strength and weight will do without these compounds. This isn't my first rodeo with diet or anabolics. I appreciate the offer to help with the diet but I have a good handle on how and what I'm doing relative to that aspect.The products are properly dosed. I can assure you that is not the problem brother.
Your massive calorie deficit is likely the issue my friend
I have used grams of traditional steroids weekly in a deep cut and gaining strength will reach a plateau due to the lack of fuel. I have been doing this for decades so if you need help dialing in your macros I would be happy to help.
Thanks!
1,600 cals daily is a massive deficit. If you are not willing to dialogue about that then there is nothing else to say brother. I would respectfully suggest you increase macros.... I've already established its not my diet. I know exactly what both my strength and weight will do without these compounds. This isn't my first rodeo with diet or anabolics. I appreciate the offer to help with the diet but I have a good handle on how and what I'm doing relative to that aspect.
I literally cannot find any reason that not just me, but the other guy in this thread, as well as a few others did not see results until mega dosing...
As I've said before, I'm loving the results and the lack of sides, I only wish it was cost effective to run this as I would have liked to run again but at these doses it's not worth it.
I would run extra tren with itJust trying to see what some of you have run this thought of it? The split of 10/10 is poorly designed but I was curious what kind of results you guys might have seen, sides, doses, etc.
I don't disagree that it is. That doesn't change the fact that I know how it effects me... Diet is not the variable in this equation1,600 cals daily is a massive deficit. If you are not willing to dialogue about that then there is nothing else to say brother. I would respectfully suggest you increase macros.
Good luck!
I don't understand why you continue to say that his diet is the reason he's not experiencing side effects at dosages he would experience sides from when using other brands. Weigh in on that part, diet aside. Obviously he already knows how this calorie deficit effects him, and how this amount of these drugs normally effects him. Interested to hear your opinion on why its requiring massive dosages for people to see results and sides they would normally see at 40mg or so. Side effects are not diet Dependant and lack sides is a good indicator something isn't right.Diet is EVERYTHING. Sups are dead last in the equation.
Nutrition, training, recovery then sups brother.
In a steep deficit anabolics are needed in a much greater amount. I have done 5-6 hard preps and the drugs needed are significantly higher than compared to a bulk. You need fuel brother.
Diet is ALWAYS a variable my friend
You're missing my statement that diet CANNOT be the variable as I've run THIS EXACT DIET without the compound and know what my strength, weight , etc all do. So no, diet is NOT the variable. To clarify:Diet is EVERYTHING. Sups are dead last in the equation.
Nutrition, training, recovery then sups brother.
In a steep deficit anabolics are needed in a much greater amount. I have done 5-6 hard preps and the drugs needed are significantly higher than compared to a bulk. You need fuel brother.
Diet is ALWAYS a variable my friend
I have run literally 30 + cycles and I can tell you side effects vary from next to nothing to obvious. As I stated originally. Going off side effects is a poor indicator of a compounds potency.I don't understand why you continue to say that his diet is the reason he's not experiencing side effects at dosages he would experience sides from when using other brands. Weigh in on that part, diet aside. Obviously he already knows how this calorie deficit effects him, and how this amount of these drugs normally effects him. Interested to hear your opinion on why its requiring massive dosages for people to see results and sides they would normally see at 40mg or so. Side effects are not diet Dependant and lack sides is a good indicator something isn't right.
That seems to be the consensus here... I'm about to finish up my run (up to 80mg e/t each day) and while I have noticed benefits (weight has been solid at an hefty deficit, strength has been slowly increasing until about a week ago), the dosing is extreme. Still zero sides (not even shrinkage which is almost immediate in anything I've run before)... BP was 106/65 or something the other day... It took 3 full bottles to run for 6 weeks which is insane from a cost:benefit perspective.Finished off a 8 week epi/tren and halo extreme combo both by ironmag. Didn't exceed recommended dosages. Was pretty disappointed. Half way through PCT already and nothing has changed in physical appearance or weight. Was thinking its bunk or extremely under dosed as well.