pmmckinnon
New member
- Awards
- 0
I've used research chems on and off for a few years now and realize that good sources always seem to mix in bunk products. I'm not sure what their intent is; whether it's to develop a loyal customer then start mixing in bunk products once they already have their trust? Idk.
Anyways, I am new to peptides and have been running GHRP-2/CJC 1295 DAC for about 2 weeks now. I decided to order my second batch from a different source so that I could compare quality and try and find a baseline for legit peptides. The second source's GHRP-2 works, but maybe not as well and hunger seems to take longer to take effect. The CJC 1295 DAC from the second source does not give near the headrush, or any at all. From my research CJC W/O DAC gives the headrush but I can't seem to confirm if DAC should as well. All doses are exactly the same. Is DAC supposed to give the headrush like W/O DAC?
My main question is, are sides with these peptides a clear indicator on quality/effectiveness?
Anyways, I am new to peptides and have been running GHRP-2/CJC 1295 DAC for about 2 weeks now. I decided to order my second batch from a different source so that I could compare quality and try and find a baseline for legit peptides. The second source's GHRP-2 works, but maybe not as well and hunger seems to take longer to take effect. The CJC 1295 DAC from the second source does not give near the headrush, or any at all. From my research CJC W/O DAC gives the headrush but I can't seem to confirm if DAC should as well. All doses are exactly the same. Is DAC supposed to give the headrush like W/O DAC?
My main question is, are sides with these peptides a clear indicator on quality/effectiveness?
