pulsing LGD-4033?

[FitnessLuke]

Okay so technically wouldn't this really limit suppression from LGD? Like using a one week on one week off approach. I know LGD is as suppressive as roids, but didn't studies prove it doesn't effect lh levels, so theoretically using one week on one week off approach cause minimal suppression with maintainable gains.

 

[carpee]

even with the suppression, LGD is going to be much easier to recover from vs. a cycle.

I would just run it straight

 

[heavylifter33]

Isn't there only 1 study on LGD? I have the full text, but here's the link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22459616

Because LGD is cumulative, and long in half life, dosing 1 week on 1 week off may help a bit but realistically you'll still see decent suppression. The gains will be negatively impacted as well. I think you'd be better off running a low-ish dose ED.

 

[Quads_of_Stee]

Okay so technically wouldn't this really limit suppression from LGD? Like using a one week on one week off approach. I know LGD is as suppressive as roids, but didn't studies prove it doesn't effect lh levels, so theoretically using one week on one week off approach cause minimal suppression with maintainable gains.

run it straight. Suppressed is suppressed, with your method I'm not sure you would even have time to recover test levels back up and instead are just spending a week wasting time. LGD is too new to know how exactly it affects a person

 

[FitnessLuke]

Well thanks guys..it looks like I'll just run it solo again for my next run.

 

[carpee]

Well thanks guys..it looks like I'll just run it solo again for my next run.

I'm running it now with GW for some recomp

loving both

 

[Jackedjack]

I'm running it now with GW for some recomp loving both

Results?