lemmingdive1
New member
- Awards
- 0
Okay I thought this was a worthwhile topic to bring up because I'm a bit confused, and it seems others are too. My understanding is that the ana:andro ratio is just that; a ratio that gives you an idea of how much anabolic activity there is in a compound RELATIVE to its androgenic activity. I've noticed many interpret the ratio differently, as a sort of absolute effectiveness ranking. For example take epistane (960:something I forgot) or msten (660:170), these compounds have high anabolic activity relative to their androgenic activity. However, just because their ratios are high, this doesn't translate into being [insert number] times as anabolic as testoterone. This just means that test has a lot of androgenic activity compared to its anabolic activity (1:1), with no way to tell something's absolute effectiveness/anabolic power just by looking at the ratio.
Do I have the correct understanding? I think I do but I really wanna clear this up because some take it as a ratio of effects as I do, while others see it as a rating for the overall strength of a compound.
Do I have the correct understanding? I think I do but I really wanna clear this up because some take it as a ratio of effects as I do, while others see it as a rating for the overall strength of a compound.