Hexadrone. ??? Help

[bert45]

Anybody here used it ? I heard its u.methylated and similar to epistane and halodrol is it good/ worth buying??

 

[jbryand101b]

It is 6-chloro-testosterone.

I haven't used it.

Would like to see someone release topical 4-chloro-boldenone (non methyl tbol) or 4chloro dehydroandrostenediol
( Non methyl hdrol)

 

[00S4Boy]

It is 6-chloro-testosterone.

I haven't used it.

Would like to see someone release topical 4-chloro-boldenone (non methyl tbol) or 4chloro dehydroandrostenediol
( Non methyl hdrol)

4 function groups don't really help a compound aside from preventing conversion to estrogen, without a 17a methyl function i think you'd end up with an extremely disappointing compound. I would also say prevents 5a reduction but i'm pretty sure all 1,4 diene compounds have affinity for 5b reductase not 5a. And as for uout non methyl hdrol, one there is no point to using dehydro in that nomenclature, two we haven't seen non methyl diols since 4-androstenediol their all diones, like diendione, boldione, trendione, mentdione not sure why asked PA if was something to do with chemical instability he didn't know.

 

[jbryand101b]

You're discussing basic info on the structure of the compounds. Good to see you continuing to learn while at phf.

It's a bit offensive though that you think I don't know these things. Must be a product of too much time at phf.

I'm discussing topical solutions. There is a reason manufactures went with a diol with compounds with a 17a methyl to make them orally bioavailable. I'll let you figure it out.

These are.compounds that haven't been tested, I originally thought of the cda in a topical solution with a previous manufacturer, but they still used cdma in their alpha test of the product. It worked well. The company sucked though and was shady.

I believe either the diol or ketone versions would work well when used topically, if you know of some complex chemistry as to why, I'd gladly like to discuss it.
This is a product I thoroughly researched years ago. And came to the conclusion, if the methyl group could be cleaved off, it'd be worth at least a alpha test.

 

[00S4Boy]

You're discussing basic info on the structure of the compounds. Good to see you continuing to learn while at phf.

It's a bit offensive though that you think I don't know these things. Must be a product of too much time at phf.

I'm discussing topical solutions. There is a reason manufactures went with a diol with compounds with a 17a methyl to make them orally bioavailable. I'll let you figure it out.

These are.compounds that haven't been tested, I originally thought of the cda in a topical solution with a previous manufacturer, but they still used cdma in their alpha test of the product. It worked well. The company sucked though and was shady.

I believe either the diol or ketone versions would work well when used topically, if you know of some complex chemistry as to why, I'd gladly like to discuss it.
This is a product I thoroughly researched years ago. And came to the conclusion, if the methyl group could be cleaved off, it'd be worth at least a alpha test.

Less then impressive ratings in vida.

 

[jbryand101b]

<img src="http://anabolicminds.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=103326"/>

Less then impressive ratings in vida.

Really? Cause Epi and methandrostenol live up to their Vida ratings right?
Lulz.