Hey, thanks for the answers DR. D, but you didn't answer the one that matters.
Patrick Arnold is saying that this base compound has zero activity when taken orally and only a few %'s when it is attached to an ester (also taken orally).
To me this seems completely worthless unless methylated... right?
and from what I've seen other Guru's post. It shouldn't be any stronger than the PH's we already had on the market.
So if we are getting 3-5% oral activity once an ester is attached and only taking 20mg, AND it's probably not as powerful as 4ad mg/mg...
Then this should be a extreme waste of money, shouldn't it?
We would be taking 20mg of something (esterfied) that is less powerful mg/mg than 4ad, where 4ad is usually taken in 600mg-1gram doses?
How is an esterfied 20mg going do ANYTHING for a person?
From what I've theorized above, taking 20mg of this (hopefully esterfied) pheremone, would be the same as taking 5-10mg of esterfied 4ad.
Which wouldn't do anything whatsoever, not even begin to supress you.
So here are my questions...
1: Is this pheremone more powerful than 4ad mg/mg?
2: Will we get enough oral activity from this compound in BASE or ESTERFIED form, to make a difference?
3: Is this type of compound only worth a damn when it is methylated?