pisces.style
New member
- Awards
- 0
I've read quite a lot over several months regarding equipoIse. I know some people love it, others don't feel it has done anything for them. It is generally accepted that gains are slow and steady of a longer period of time, and because of alternative compounds available, many prefer other substitutes.
We know that Boldenone is very similar to testosterone -- just as anabolic and half as androgenic. And from this comes my question, which I cannot find an answer to anywhere.
If Boldenone is just as anabolic and half as androgenic as testosterone:
This is where I'm stuck. To add boldenone at a 1:1 ratio, or to double test. Not interested in other compounds at this time, I have my reasons, I know enough, I just need THIS question answered (why would Boldenone be better than doubling test -- what's the benefit? Does it offer something test doesnt?)
We know that Boldenone is very similar to testosterone -- just as anabolic and half as androgenic. And from this comes my question, which I cannot find an answer to anywhere.
If Boldenone is just as anabolic and half as androgenic as testosterone:
A) What is the actual benefit of adding boldenone to a cycle, as opposed to doubling the test instead?
B) Is doubling the test (instead of a test to boldenone ratio of 1:1) going to give lesser, equal, or similar results?
This is where I'm stuck. To add boldenone at a 1:1 ratio, or to double test. Not interested in other compounds at this time, I have my reasons, I know enough, I just need THIS question answered (why would Boldenone be better than doubling test -- what's the benefit? Does it offer something test doesnt?)