Are Steroids close to being socially accepted?
- 07-05-2013, 09:21 PM
- 07-05-2013, 09:48 PM
i think MAYBE in 2 generations time... for example in my life, most of the people around my grandparents age are 100% against it...
the middle aged people in my life (parents, uncles, older friends, etc) are split but still more on the side of "not understanding" or "not approving"
however, most of my friends between the age of 20-30 say they may not want to use them or may not understand their use, but agree that if the "drug" is not hurting others and is not being used for financial gain or competitive advantage (ie in pro sports) then why should someone not be allowed to use them
a similar argument to the already mentioned "marijuana" debate
there will always be people on both sides of the spectrum, but i think they will become MORE socially accepted, i do not think there will ever be a majority that socially accepts them though
just my experience!CURRENT 2014 Log http://anabolicminds.com/forum/old-school-hormone/252748-cherry-poppin-test.html
07-05-2013, 11:12 PM
07-05-2013, 11:26 PM
07-05-2013, 11:34 PM
07-05-2013, 11:42 PM
Who was that Canadian Olympic sprinter that set the world record 100m that got caught? He came back a few years later and was slower. That was kind of the worlds acknowledgement to them making a person stronger and faster.
And talk about socially unaccepted at the time but Canada also banned him..
07-05-2013, 11:54 PM
07-06-2013, 12:14 AM
Part of the reason they won't be accepted is due to RAMPANT irresponsible (and oftentimes dangerous) use by impatient and inexperienced trainees.
We can all read studies that show PEDs can and are used safely, but those are countered by the endless stream of jackassery that comes with novice steroid use. All one has to do is spend 10 minutes perusing the Anabolics section to see what I'm talking about.
Additionally, you won't hear stories about successful use. Guys that get blood panels before/during/after, practice responsible use and quietly grow aren't who we hear from. We hear from the idiots who think TRT is a legal cycle, idiots whose endocrine system is irreparably incapacitated from banging a gram of test/week for 6 months, idiots who beat the shyt out of someone in a fit of rage and blame "the juice".
The negative connotations are, at this point (IMHO), insurmountable.
Don't worry, man, someday I'ma be nobody too.
07-06-2013, 11:28 AM
07-06-2013, 01:33 PM
07-06-2013, 02:05 PM
07-06-2013, 02:52 PM
Use them correctly, and we'd have 0 issues. However people are imperfect therefore we need rules and regulations. But I do agree they go too far with those.
07-06-2013, 02:55 PM
The way I see it is. It is your body, your temple. No man has the right to dictate what you do with it. If you wanna run 150mg of tren a day so be it. When you go into a coma and **** don't blame the roids, blame yourself for being an idiot.
That is your Liberty. Something that has been forgotten in this country of rules and regulation.
07-06-2013, 03:10 PM
07-06-2013, 05:34 PM
07-06-2013, 05:39 PM
07-06-2013, 05:42 PM
No one is debating that they make you stronger and faster. The question is why you and others consider that to be unacceptable. As you said, a user still has to be in the work. And the successful users usually outwork just about everyone, because steroids enable them to do so.
And just because the world at large labeled Ben Johnson as a cheater doesn't mean that he is, nor does it affirm your idea that steroid use in sport is cheating. The world has not thought critically about this subject. It has made snap judgments based on emotion and preconceived notions, as it often does.
07-06-2013, 05:45 PM
Its cheating when the rules in the sport say so. Tell me what pro sports don't have rules against PEDs.
07-06-2013, 05:50 PM
07-06-2013, 05:59 PM
If your pursuit to life, liberty and happiness is to do large amounts of steroids, or alcohol, or pain killers then so be it.
What's narrow about that?
The fact you may effect a family member per say? As long as its not physical or jeopardizing the life of your child or your ability to care for said child its your right. Now you cross that line and there's things in place to punish you. Which is acceptable under our constitutional republic.
07-06-2013, 06:07 PM
You just made the point that we should be allowed to do as we please with our bodies; why does that thinking not extend to sport? Why not allow EVERYTHING, and say Okay, it's up to you, the competitor, to choose what you are and aren't willing to do in order to compete at the highest level. And for those athletes who fear steroids and the misguided masses who abhor them, drug-free leagues would pop up for all sports. But the example provided by bodybuilding has already showed us how those drug-free leagues would fare.
Speaking of which, you still haven't explained why you feel that steroids in bodybuilding are justified and should be allowed.
07-06-2013, 06:29 PM
The pursuits you list not only make you a danger to others but to your own health. And when one wrecks his health in such a manner, the general public picks up the tab, either because the individual expects his insurance to pay for treating his self-inflicted wounds, which raises all of our healthcare costs, or because said individual has no insurance, and the hospital system increase costs to help offset their losses, which increases costs to insurers, who pass that cost on to the consumer. This is perhaps best illustrated by the backlash created by New York mayor Michael Bloomberg's recent crusade against massive-sized sodas. The same fat ****s who have gathered to battle against his efforts to protect them and their children from themselves will expect the rest of us to pay for the care that they will receive for their type II adult-onset diabetes and the host of other serious and expensive ailments that will come with it. Liberty does not endow the right to complete recklessness and irresponsibility; a society has a responsibility to itself, and its members to each other.
And how about those who fear no consequence? We see this in the mass shootings that happen with ever greater frequency in the US. The perpetrators of these crimes often commence their acts ready and willing to die. They fear no reprisal, and when the threat of punishment is not enough to deter one from thoughts of mass murder, mass murder will occur. And yet, still we fight not just for the right to bear firearms, but for completely unfettered access to them, even when such availability ensures that they will end up in the hands of those who should not possess them. I say this not to initiate a debate on gun control, but to illustrate the point that the threat of punishment is not enough to protect those in a society who exists peaceably and responsibly.
These are the reasons I say your thinking is too narrow. You haven't thought deep enough on such topics.
07-06-2013, 09:15 PM
I often wonder if I'm the only one that thinks that all pro sports should require their players to take PEDs? lol. I mean if your supposed to strive to be the best and destroy everyone then why not use them?
Why not zoidberg?
07-06-2013, 09:43 PM
I feel like people still associate steroids use with "roid rage" and cheating in sports. But I wish people would see it's much more than that for the rest of us. We can just blame the media.
07-06-2013, 09:48 PM
I think these laws against steroids are against our own constitution. Any overdosed substance can cause damage.
Similar Forum Threads
- By ReaperX in forum AnabolicsReplies: 16Last Post: 06-06-2008, 03:43 PM
- By spitboy in forum General ChatReplies: 5Last Post: 05-12-2005, 01:55 PM
- By Zim in forum AnabolicsReplies: 11Last Post: 07-19-2004, 05:13 PM
- By Campeon in forum AnabolicsReplies: 11Last Post: 12-08-2003, 08:53 PM