First Dbol and Test E cycle

stephenm

New member
Awards
0
Hi all, im 25 and from the u.k
I am planning on doing my first d-bol and test E cycle.

my stats are
Male
25
5' 8.4"
11.1 stone (71kg)
bmi 23.4
Body fat 12.3
consuming 4000+ calories a day

Have been training for many years on and off, and now feel i want to step up a gear so i want too try a dbol and test e cycle.

my intended plan is:

week 1-10: dbol (40 per day)
week 1-12: test e (500 per week. two 250 injections mon and thursday)
week 12-14; nothing.
week 14 pct course

I was just wondering wether it is possible to bulk up and keep your body fat down?
im eating 5 meals per day plus two protien shakes (at 1000 calories and 50g protein each, fulll fat milk)
will cardio do this?
exuse my slight ignorance. :)
 

stephenm

New member
Awards
0
i will upload photos and lifting atats when i reach 50 posts which will be soon hopefully!
 

druller655321

Member
Awards
0
Dbol is rough on the liver. You shouldn't run it for ten weeks, 4-6 weeks would be plenty for s kickstart.
 

stephenm

New member
Awards
0
hi druller. I just want to run it early to kick start as the test wont kick in hard until 5 weeks onwards, so maybe 1-4 on dbol, instead on 4-6?
 

stephenm

New member
Awards
0
gerbil, any advice please? iv done all my research on this site and have been reading through the forum for about a month, and have saw your posts before and know you have good knowledge, so advice please
 
DangerDave

DangerDave

Well-known member
Awards
0
Run Dbol at 50mg for no more than 6 weeks
 
mikeybhoy7

mikeybhoy7

New member
Awards
0
hi druller. I just want to run it early to kick start as the test wont kick in hard until 5 weeks onwards, so maybe 1-4 on dbol, instead on 4-6?
He meant run the dbol for 4-6 weeks max not for weeks 4-6 of cycle.

So run the dbol from week 1 to week 6 then stop.
 
abs322

abs322

Banned
Awards
0
i would cut it to an 8-10 wk cycle and run dbol (30-40mg day) for wks 1-4 and get some winny (40-50mg day) for wks 5-8 .. run the test (500mg) and get some deca or eq (400mg) to go with it for wks 1-8.
 
Gerbil

Gerbil

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
i would cut it to an 8-10 wk cycle and run dbol (30-40mg day) for wks 1-4 and get some winny (40-50mg day) for wks 5-8 .. run the test (500mg) and get some deca or eq (400mg) to go with it for wks 1-8.
No, no, no. Deca and eq are very long esters 8 weeks would be silly and just postpone pct. Then saying oh less harmful then d-bol for 8 weeks is less hepatoxic d-bol then more hepatoxic winny added in there.

Do you have any idea what you are talking about or parroting not very bright people.
 
abs322

abs322

Banned
Awards
0
i said 8 or 10 wks.. nothing wrong with either. i would personally do 10 wks and take a 2 wk break on the orals in the middle, either way 4 weeks of winny and 4 wks of dbol stacked with test and eq or deca has been done many times by many people with great results.. i would start pct 2 wks after last shot. run some milk thistle if liver issues are a concern.
 
DangerDave

DangerDave

Well-known member
Awards
0
i said 8 or 10 wks.. nothing wrong with either. i would personally do 10 wks and take a 2 wk break on the orals in the middle, either way 4 weeks of winny and 4 wks of dbol stacked with test and eq or deca has been done many times by many people with great results.. i would start pct 2 wks after last shot. run some milk thistle if liver issues are a concern.
I see what your say. My opinion with orals especially with very hepatoxic oral is this.. you shouldn't stack them, you can run multiple ones during a cycle BUT you need to let the first clear your system before the next one is started. This allows your liver to take a break and heal/recover before you wage chemical warfare on it again.

Like I said that's my OPINION. No science to back up the theory other than my blood work on cycles. I love running orals for kickers and finishers and I do it at very high doses so that's why I give my liver a couple weeks between.
 
DetroitHammer

DetroitHammer

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Dbol for the first 4 weeks is sound. Stanzabol for 4wks after a 2 week pause is ok, especially if you inject it because there is more nitrogen retention when you inject it and it's easier on your liver. Running Test e for all or most of the cycle is also good. But the last phase I would run either mast or tren with the Stanzabol/test. Equip is just glue in your veins waiting to harden and I've already said enough about deca; it's never a good idea to take Deca.

i said 8 or 10 wks.. nothing wrong with either. i would personally do 10 wks and take a 2 wk break on the orals in the middle, either way 4 weeks of winny and 4 wks of dbol stacked with test and eq or deca has been done many times by many people with great results.. i would start pct 2 wks after last shot. run some milk thistle if liver issues are a concern.
 
mikeybhoy7

mikeybhoy7

New member
Awards
0
Dbol for the first 4 weeks is sound. Stanzabol for 4wks after a 2 week pause is ok, especially if you inject it because there is more nitrogen retention when you inject it and it's easier on your liver. Running Test e for all or most of the cycle is also good. But the last phase I would run either mast or tren with the Stanzabol/test. Equip is just glue in your veins waiting to harden and I've already said enough about deca; it's never a good idea to take Deca.
Why never a good idea to take deca?
 
mikeybhoy7

mikeybhoy7

New member
Awards
0
It's weak and super suppressive and that suppression cannot be controlled by AI/SERMs.
I've always been led to believe deca gives slow but stead and lean gains? So what would you recommend as a bulking cycle? I'm currently running test deca and dbol. Only one week into cycle.
 

figdaddy

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
I've always been led to believe deca gives slow but stead and lean gains? So what would you recommend as a bulking cycle? I'm currently running test deca and dbol. Only one week into cycle.
start ur own thread
 
abs322

abs322

Banned
Awards
0
Dbol for the first 4 weeks is sound. Stanzabol for 4wks after a 2 week pause is ok, especially if you inject it because there is more nitrogen retention when you inject it and it's easier on your liver. Running Test e for all or most of the cycle is also good. But the last phase I would run either mast or tren with the Stanzabol/test. Equip is just glue in your veins waiting to harden and I've already said enough about deca; it's never a good idea to take Deca.

He said it's his 1st cycle so im trying to keep it simple & not make him a pin cushion yet.. test & deca or eq is fairly mild and only reqs two shots a week. i personally like tren & mast but depending on the ester i would normally run that with prop on a eod or e2d inject sched, not really a program for beginners. same deal if he had inj winny, i would tell him to drink it instead of daily injects to start out.
 
abs322

abs322

Banned
Awards
0
some like deca some dont, its more of a personal preference type gear and availability is always a deciding factor..personally i prefer eq, problem is finding a quality vet source for your horse.. QV isnt around anymore at least wityh deca you can stil get the organon made stuff, just watch for fakes. the problems with deca is the hpta suppression, deca dick and progesterone gyno along with lingering metabolites which could show up on a lab test if thats a concern. its believed winny will counter the progesterone or some take proviron or caber.. its "weak' in the sense its a safe choice like ananvar, primo, maxibolan, etc, more anabolic than androgenic..however if your stacking 400mg wk with 500mg test cyp/en the gains should be solid. i would frontload the 1st wk. tren is also found to have progesterone sides ..
 
DangerDave

DangerDave

Well-known member
Awards
0
He said it's his 1st cycle so im trying to keep it simple & not make him a pin cushion yet.. test & deca or eq is fairly mild and only reqs two shots a week. i personally like tren & mast but depending on the ester i would normally run that with prop on a eod or e2d inject sched, not really a program for beginners. same deal if he had inj winny, i would tell him to drink it instead of daily injects to start out.
I see why you recommended the long esters but I agree with Detroit and am not a DECA fan. I don't like eq because it makes your blood thicker but plenty of people use it and love the results. I would run eq over deca if I had to pick between the 2. Just me tho. To each their own.
 
DetroitHammer

DetroitHammer

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Yes, it's a personal choice, just like someone saying they like crack cocaine and some don't. Like it or not, it's not good. You can't control the sides you get with Deca. The one reference I provided helps explain why. Anyone who says they've used it with great gains, are usually on test/tren/etc. So of course you're going to see gains, but you can't attribute them to deca with all the other gear in you. Someone would have to run a straight cycle on only nandrolone, which is not good, to see how much the gains are compared to test.

some like deca some dont, its more of a personal preference type gear and availability is always a deciding factor..personally i prefer eq, problem is finding a quality vet source for your horse.. ..
 
abs322

abs322

Banned
Awards
0
Yes, it's a personal choice, just like someone saying they like crack cocaine and some don't. Like it or not, it's not good. You can't control the sides you get with Deca. The one reference I provided helps explain why. Anyone who says they've used it with great gains, are usually on test/tren/etc. So of course you're going to see gains, but you can't attribute them to deca with all the other gear in you. Someone would have to run a straight cycle on only nandrolone, which is not good, to see how much the gains are compared to test.
fair enough, ive only run deca with test and an oral, so technically i cant say the deca did great for producing anything but then again i cant say it didnt either, ive used EQ more than deca and always had great overall gains with the stack. i never ran less than a 500/400 combo of test/deca or eq though and have always used 2 orals with it. I would just have to fall back on the scientific literature of deca being a protein sparing anabolic useful in maintaining a positive nitrogen balance especially in low calorie restricted diets like when cutting up with anavar, primo etc..

article in Muscular Devlpmnt:

.musculardevelopment.com/articles/chemical-enhancement/532-in-praise-of-nandrolone.html (add http & www)


some med journal studies of deca alone:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15076791 (add http & www)

jasn.asnjournals.org/content/17/8/2307.abstract (add http)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15767536 add http & www

jcem.endojournals.org/content/84/4/1268.long (add http)
 

Stupes

Guest
gerbil, any advice please? iv done all my research on this site and have been reading through the forum for about a month, and have saw your posts before and know you have good knowledge, so advice please
Best advice you can get - do your research in multiple places not just this site and especially not this thread - here are a few ridiculous comments from this thread:

1) Deca is weak - Deca has been a cornerstone of bodybuilding for 50 years, and it still works - plus it has been scientifically proven to be more anabolic than testosterone - stronger per mg
2) Most of the gains people see on deca is while they are on test/tren - deca is rarely stacked with tren
3 Deca sides can't be controlled- keep the test dose at trt level and deca will have very little/zero sides at 600mg per week in most people - it aromatizes at about 1/4 the rate of testosterone and when testosterone is kept in normal trt ranges prolactin is typically not an issue.
4) Don't do Deca because it is highly suppressive - every AAS cycle of 8+ weeks is going to put your natural production to ZERO and deca doesn't give you negative levels so a 12 week test cycle is the same thing. (deca ester is longer though)
5) Do and 8 week deca or EQ cycle - right when it kicks in you will be coming off the cycle - it's dumb
 

figdaddy

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
Best advice you can get - do your research in multiple places not just this site and especially not this thread - here are a few ridiculous comments from this thread:

1) Deca is weak - Deca has been a cornerstone of bodybuilding for 50 years, and it still works - plus it has been scientifically proven to be more anabolic than testosterone - stronger per mg
2) Most of the gains people see on deca is while they are on test/tren - deca is rarely stacked with tren
3 Deca sides can't be controlled- keep the test dose at trt level and deca will have very little/zero sides at 600mg per week in most people - it aromatizes at about 1/4 the rate of testosterone and when testosterone is kept in normal trt ranges prolactin is typically not an issue.
4) Don't do Deca because it is highly suppressive - every AAS cycle of 8+ weeks is going to put your natural production to ZERO and deca doesn't give you negative levels so a 12 week test cycle is the same thing. (deca ester is longer though)
5) Do and 8 week deca or EQ cycle - right when it kicks in you will be coming off the cycle - it's dumb
My friend, I like that u draw on personal experience (best kind of data imo), but you are one case. The truth is detroit hammer is right in what hes saying. Remember he is speaking in terms of relativity to other drugs. U got over 10 years on me and i can tell u that most of the successful up and coming athletes are skipping deca entirely for the reasons DH mentioned. Decas true medical benefit is mostly attributed joint healing. And not to be a dick, but tren/deca stacks ive seen become more common than just test and deca. But once again, I TOO am a single case. Decca should be run no less than 14 weeks to really make its effects worth the suppression.
 

figdaddy

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
Oh and btw, being that we are referring to long ester nandrolone....the sides are very difficult to control as itll take a few weeks to clear if bailing becomes necessary.
 

Stupes

Guest
My friend, I like that u draw on personal experience (best kind of data imo), but you are one case. The truth is detroit hammer is right in what hes saying. Remember he is speaking in terms of relativity to other drugs.
Relative to Tren/Orals, yes it's weak. Relative to Testosterone/EQ - it's not.

U got over 10 years on me and i can tell u that most of the successful up and coming athletes are skipping deca entirely for the reasons DH mentioned.
Nandrolone had a bad rep for many many years but is gaining in popularity as of late - NPP in particular. Why? Because low test/high anabolic cycles are gaining in popularity and nandrolone is perfect in that environment. You can run it at 600-800mg per week and get the growth and joint benefits of SOME estrogen but it doesn't create the out of control estrogen atmosphere that Test does at higher doses. Running high test and high deca is problematic due to crazy estrogen/prolactin.

Decas true medical benefit is mostly attributed joint healing.
I have looked for controlled, scientific studies on nandrolone's collagen synthesis abilities and have not been able to find good ones - please show me where to find these if they exist - I'm interested. My understanding is that nandrolone's medical use is to fight muscle wasting and osteoporosis - so building muscle and increasing bone density.....
 

figdaddy

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
A friend of mine whose parents have been docs for 20 years have prescribed it to patients for that reason. Ill try to draw on the studies but i have not flipped through them in quite some time. The majority of my research on deca was done a year or two back now.
 

Stupes

Guest
A friend of mine whose parents have been docs for 20 years have prescribed it to patients for that reason. Ill try to draw on the studies but i have not flipped through them in quite some time. The majority of my research on deca was done a year or two back now.
Thanks - yes, please let me know if you find any.

Regardless - nandrolone is FDA approved for treating osteoporosis and anemia. It is rarely used anymore for either - it is occasionally used to treat muscle wasting and red blood cell count in AIDS patients however. HRT clinics will prescribe it to treat joint pain but that is "off label" usage.

Schering brought the drug through FDA approval and the healing of joints were not part of the process, nor their research.
 

stephenm

New member
Awards
0
sorry about not replying to anyones comments, been hectic at work and training hard when i can. well on my 3rd pin today, so 7 days into my course, had amazingly good results. i have put on 7 lbs, so now weight 11' 8' and have noticed a good increase in strength and feel really pumped. so really happy so far with the results so far. as this is my first course i would like to keep it a fairly simple course. will taking test e on its own (after the dbol finishes at week six) still yield an increase in size and strength?
 
abs322

abs322

Banned
Awards
0
500mg/wk is just a really high trt dose.. u may get some size and strength but at 25 yo u should already have decent test levels , albeit not as high as 500mg wk will give you but if you're gonna shut down your hpta i wouldnt do it for less than a gram a week of gear.. ie.. 500/400 test /deca or whatever else + an oral (dbol & anavar/winny or whatever else u can acquire)
 

Stupes

Guest
500mg/wk is just a really high trt dose.. u may get some size and strength but at 25 yo u should already have decent test levels , albeit not as high as 500mg wk will give you but if you're gonna shut down your hpta i wouldnt do it for less than a gram a week of gear.. ie.. 500/400 test /deca or whatever else + an oral (dbol & anavar/winny or whatever else u can acquire)
You need to stop giving advice! Holy sh*t - 500 is not anything close to a TRT dose. Ridiculous.
 
DetroitHammer

DetroitHammer

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Best advice you can get - do your research in multiple places not just this site and especially not this thread - here are a few ridiculous comments from this thread:

1) Deca is weak - Deca has been a cornerstone of bodybuilding for 50 years, and it still works - plus it has been scientifically proven to be more anabolic than testosterone - stronger per mg
2) Most of the gains people see on deca is while they are on test/tren - deca is rarely stacked with tren
3 Deca sides can't be controlled- keep the test dose at trt level and deca will have very little/zero sides at 600mg per week in most people - it aromatizes at about 1/4 the rate of testosterone and when testosterone is kept in normal trt ranges prolactin is typically not an issue.
4) Don't do Deca because it is highly suppressive - every AAS cycle of 8+ weeks is going to put your natural production to ZERO and deca doesn't give you negative levels so a 12 week test cycle is the same thing. (deca ester is longer though)
5) Do and 8 week deca or EQ cycle - right when it kicks in you will be coming off the cycle - it's dumb
I'm on the road and it's hard to respond but you've got to be kidding with these ridiculous claims?
 
Gerbil

Gerbil

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
129e7cd0a536676b98ef4399f45fd275-internet-fight.gif



I feel as though this is warranted.

Also Deca is more suppressive than test, end of conversation this is not even debatable. Being butt hurt about that fact is no reason to say anything else.
 
DetroitHammer

DetroitHammer

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Man, you've got to do your homework. Some things you said are reaosnable, but others are way off. When I get back and get on a computer I'll address this better.
 

Stupes

Guest
Man, you've got to do your homework. Some things you said are reaosnable, but others are way off. When I get back and get on a computer I'll address this better.
We disagree about nandrlone, no doubt. I think it is garbage when used with high dose test, and hence has received a bad reputation. But remove supra levels of test and its great.

BTW - you seem like a really good guy so I apologize if I attacked you a bit with my post. Looking forward to your thoughts when you get off the road....
 
Gerbil

Gerbil

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
On the subject of suppression of natural test levels here is what a 200mg injection of npp or deca does. This is why we use hcg during deca/npp cycles. And yes it is more suppressive than test. Note how 200mg tanks test production.

Deca02.gif
 

Stupes

Guest
On the subject of suppression of natural test levels here is what a 200mg injection of npp or deca does. This is why we use hcg during deca/npp cycles. And yes it is more suppressive than test. Note how 200mg tanks test production.

<img src="http://anabolicminds.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=74960"/>
If you do 200mg of test, you will shut down. People use hcg during all sorts of cycles of substantial length, not just nandrolone cycles.

200mg of deca per week is completely suppressive whereas 20mg of anavar per day is not completely suppressive. These are clinical doses and this is where the nandrolone suppression comes into play. It doesn't come into play with body building doses - all of your cycles will shut you down to zero - nandrolone or not. Hence the desire to run a test base.

Tren shuts your ass down fast at very low doses - SD shuts me down to zero at 20mg per day. You can go on and on.

Pulsing orals are a different story of course.....
 
Gerbil

Gerbil

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
If you do 200mg of test, you will shut down. People use hcg during all sorts of cycles of substantial length, not just nandrolone cycles.

200mg of deca per week is completely suppressive whereas 20mg of anavar per day is not completely suppressive. These are clinical doses and this is where the nandrolone suppression comes into play. It doesn't come into play with body building doses - all of your cycles will shut you down to zero - nandrolone or not. Hence the desire to run a test base.

Tren shuts your ass down fast at very low doses - SD shuts me down to zero at 20mg per day. You can go on and on.

Pulsing orals are a different story of course.....
Took two weeks to suppress natural test levels with 250mg of test c.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9394096
 
Gerbil

Gerbil

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Thus test less suppressive than deca.
 
Gerbil

Gerbil

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Also I never claimed that test wasnt suppressive and I dont think you will find anyone who would.
 

Stupes

Guest
Thus test less suppressive than deca.
At bodybuilding doses everything you use is 100% suppressive. Your natural production gets turned off. So they are all equally suppressive. The difference appears at clinical doses.
 
Gerbil

Gerbil

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
At bodybuilding doses everything you use is 100% suppressive. Your natural production gets turned off. So they are all equally suppressive. The difference appears at clinical doses.
I disagree and I will follow up with, show me a single study that shows that.
 

Stupes

Guest
I disagree and I will follow up with, show me a single study that shows that.
200mg of test suppresses your natural production to zero! Tons of guys are on TRT at that dose and use HCG to keep the balls active. Are you serious? You think you are ruining any cycle that isn't shutting you down? Unless it is a pulse or 20 mg of var (or other low dose, short oral cycles) you are shut down. The tren cycle you are going to do - you don't think that will shut your ass down? 500 mg of test will shut you down.

Why else run a pct?!!! Please tell us the magic cycle that doesn't shut you down - I will run it all the time and never need to PCT.

And I dont waste my time posting studies on something so elementary - go do your own work...
 
abs322

abs322

Banned
Awards
0
You need to stop giving advice! Holy sh*t - 500 is not anything close to a TRT dose. Ridiculous.
well its not exactly a bodybuilding cycle dose.. it falls in between where a high "custom" trt protocol ends and where a bodybuilding cycle base begins
 

Stupes

Guest
well its not exactly a bodybuilding cycle dose.. it falls in between where a high "custom" trt protocol ends and where a bodybuilding cycle base begins
No - it's an old-school beginner cycle dose. And a pro body builder type cruise dose. But no real TRT doc would even approach that. The phony "HRT" clinics down in Fla - sure....
 
DetroitHammer

DetroitHammer

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Just got back. First, your comments on Peter are interesting and although we may disagree on his findings, I tend to agree with you that not everything he says is accurate. But we're not talking about him right now so I'll move on...
Deca is supposed to be more anabolic than test (less androgenic) but I've read conflicting studies. One such study had a group of healthy males (I think 10 per group) given only test at 400mgs and nandrolone at 400mgs, once a week for I believe 10 weeks. None of the subjects knew what they were taking. At the end of the study strength increased in both groups but only the test group showed increased muscle size around the neck, chest and biceps. All subjects showed some increase in strength. The nandrolone group showed growth around the mid section and thighs, but not remarkable. I cite this study because it tends to support my experience as well as that of a doctor who used to be heavy into AAS and is now a TRT specialist. Peter's theory seemed to add some credence to this as well. And I am aware that there are other studies that seem to support the opposite. I could conduct an experiment with a couple of subjects to see what happens, using only deca and only using test, but the sample size would be so small that the findings would lack credibility.

You shouldn't stack deca with tren, but many, many do. I'm not suggesting it's a good stacking, but it's like saying no one drinks and drives; they just do.

I don't think prolactin is the issue, or the only issue running deca. There are guys who run deca and report no noticeable sides, although I believe the sides just weren't as severe. So those guys may run a TRT dose of test and feel that the trt dose was enough to control the sides, whereas it really didn't do anything because they weren't as sensitive to deca as others are. We know that deca has a very strong estrogenic effect that cannot be explained by the typical aromatization. Estren seems to be the culprit, a synthetic SERM introduced by nandrolone. The best study I could find on estren indicates that: "The recently described extranuclear mode of action of estren in bone has led to the definition of a novel class of mechanism-specific substances called ANGELS (Activator of NonGenotropic Estrogen-Like Signaling) (Manolagas et al., 2002). However, the present study indicates that estren rather, in a wider perspective, is a SERM with transcriptional activity." Also, it concludes that, "The effects of estren on bone and uterus are mediated via ERs, and the AR cannot replace the ERs for these effects. Furthermore, it is clear that estren has the capacity to exert genomic effects mediated via ERs." Granted, the study looked at the weight of the uterus and thymus, but the effects of estren compared to E2 were very well compared and estren does seem to have E2 sides. Of interest is that deca seems to produce estren with very little binding to the AR! So estren is being introduced not by the conventional aromatizing effect--which can be mediated--but by other means. Thus, I believe that deca produced estren is not adequately mediated by AIs or SERMs. Peter identified this but further research does give that theory credence. At least all of this supports my belief so I'm using it! :)

I agree that if you take any AAS you are shutting yourself down. Totally agree. The problem with deca (besides the long ester of deconate) is the estren and it's longer lasting effect. A guy in this site, Morey I believe, starting out with NP and was shut down hard. So even the shorter ester didn't help.

Having said all that, everyone reacts differently to AAS, especially when it comes to aromatization. I will always caution anyone to be careful before using nandralone or equip. Do I take my own advice? I pop Anadrol quite often, abuse tren, play with cheque drops and experiment with bolasterone. I'm no model to follow that's for sure. I just enjoy researching this stuff and playing around to see what happens. If proven wrong, which I have been, I will back off and not try to win for the sake of winning a point. You've made some good points and actually caused me to reaffirm my memory of studies by digging into my notes.

Stay around, I enjoy your opposing views, even if I may not agree.

Best advice you can get - do your research in multiple places not just this site and especially not this thread - here are a few ridiculous comments from this thread:

1) Deca is weak - Deca has been a cornerstone of bodybuilding for 50 years, and it still works - plus it has been scientifically proven to be more anabolic than testosterone - stronger per mg
2) Most of the gains people see on deca is while they are on test/tren - deca is rarely stacked with tren
3 Deca sides can't be controlled- keep the test dose at trt level and deca will have very little/zero sides at 600mg per week in most people - it aromatizes at about 1/4 the rate of testosterone and when testosterone is kept in normal trt ranges prolactin is typically not an issue.
4) Don't do Deca because it is highly suppressive - every AAS cycle of 8+ weeks is going to put your natural production to ZERO and deca doesn't give you negative levels so a 12 week test cycle is the same thing. (deca ester is longer though)
5) Do and 8 week deca or EQ cycle - right when it kicks in you will be coming off the cycle - it's dumb
 

Similar threads


Top