Why post if your not going to answer my question? Get off this thread.
I choose to run tren as a staple rather then test. Test, in my opinion is
sloppy and can lead to easy fat deposits if not kept in check with some
sort of ant-E. Tren gives you all the benefits of test but without the instant
gratification of that bullshit watery look that new-age bodybuilders have
grown to love for some reason. Now lets get back to my original question.
I have never used either of these drug so I want some opinions on them.
I think test is over rated as well but I usually leave the attitude at home here. Most Americans strongly believe in test for every thing. I am wondering what you’re thinking your going to get with that snide manner of yours.
BTW your question has been asked and answered before. Try the search button and search for EQ/Deca cycles (no test). I recall making an argument for fina-based cycles before. I happen to like and approve of these and I also believe that Dbol only cycles can be made to work fine. These are not popular opinions but as I try and be polite and make a good argument for them my opinion is usually respected. You should give it a try; you will probably get much farther then this thread is going to take you.
If you are so experienced that you know better then the vast majority of steroid users why do you have to ask newbie level questions about 2 very commonly used drugs that are included in almost any steroid profile section?
Also if your so susceptible to body fat from test I am guessing that your diet could use some work as it is mostly responsible for the progress or the lack of it.
.. but also makes my muscles grow like nothing i've ever used before. tren is awesome in the fact that it strips bodyfat off like nothing i've ever seen before w/ moderate muscle gains on a calorie deficit, but but tren on its own makes me feel like absolute ****.
