I think you're reading to much of this at face value and don't understand HOW he ended up at those results. The reason Alcohol ended up number one:Shame on U.S Government ! wow..... once you are 18 you can smoke Tobacco, once you are 21 you can drink **** load of Alcohol and YET STEROIDS are less Harmful HAHAHAAH !
All harmful things should be banned, Driving should be banned because they are dangerous also, skydiving, snowboarding... lol
what you got on my ph fix--..son??Also I would seem to think the reason Anabolic Steroids ranked so low on the list is because of the fact people don't go out and fight over bottles of PH's and create gang's to sell injectibles on the corner.
I really wouldn't use some random website as empirical evidence for your perspective. I get where you're coming from in this instance, but you have to realize that availability and acceptability play a huge role in this.No, I found a chart in a website that had PERSONAL HARMNESS and Social HARMNESS and still steroids were on the bottom on both !!! LOL
I really wouldn't use some random website as empirical evidence for your perspective. I get where you're coming from in this instance, but you have to realize that availability and acceptability play a huge role in this.
Also, the way you're always carrying on about this makes it sound like you may be an AAS/peptide abuser.
Using legality as your stance for abuse is all sorts of logical fail. For example, let's use alcohol for this. Now, alcohol is legal to consume/purchase after 21, but there is a huge difference in someone who drinks responsibly (a few drinks several times a week) and someone who gets hammered everyday. The first person is an example of a user and the second an example of an abuser.That's from BBC !!!! It's not a random website.... We are all AAS Abusers because they are ILLEGAL !
Man, Weed is deemed more harmful than Ketamine! :icon_lol:LOL i would love to see the conclusions that brought the score for weed
On another note....If alcohol is really that bad...guess im fu*ked lol
Did you read the article? The drugs aren't ranked specifically based on how much damage they cause to the body. There are many variables that play into how they are ranked. Again, which is why AAS ranked lower than Marijuana yet higher than Ecstasy.Is anyone just encouraged to try LSD, ecstacy, or mushrooms after reading how safe they are?
Using legality as your stance for abuse is all sorts of logical fail. For example, let's use alcohol for this. Now, alcohol is legal to consume/purchase after 21, but there is a huge difference in someone who drinks responsibly (a few drinks several times a week) and someone who gets hammered everyday. The first person is an example of a user and the second an example of an abuser.
There is such a thing as responsible steroid use, but, more often than not, it is abused usually due to a lack of responsibility. Hell, most of the recent ban occurred because of abuse by HS kids.
I didn't look at the article but someone was discussing how heroin (opium) is the safest drug because it binds so well in the body. Alcohol is bad because the effective dose can be considered .1 BAC, and the lethal dose can be .4. So 4 times the effective dose of alcohol is deadly. It takes 10 times the effective dose of heroin (that isn't tainted with battery acid) to kill someone.On another note....If alcohol is really that bad...guess im fu*ked lol
I think you misread my statement. I am saying that there is a huge difference between use and abuse and using legality/prescribed is useless when it comes to defining this. The scope of what defines "performance enhancing" is a very broad spectrum. I contend that any opiates/narcotics are even more dangerous than AAS because they're so readily available and accepted. I fail to see how taking something like a cortisone shot after injury is worse than taking nandralone to avoid injury. Abuse occurs when the usage becomes deleterious to the body and when it creates more problems than it solves.I have to disagree with this, the use of steroids such as HIV patients, burn victims, or MS patients seems like a good reason to take steroids, and at their prescribed amounts for these diseases/injuries are not chategorized as abuse. The use of AAS to get bigger taking higher doseages than what is perscribed by anyone is abuse. There is no performance enhancing responsible anabolic steroid user. The use of any medication to get a benefit either physical or mental beyond the intent of the drug is abuse. Yes u can run high amounts of AAS with a reasonable (not devoid but reasonable) amount of safety. Is it safe? no. Are there side effects? yes. Is intentionally taking too much of a medication to attain a specific goal, other than what the medication is designed for abuse? yes it is.
Again dont get me wrong i love steroids but you guys have to stop sugar coating what ur doing. Any abuse of a medication to get a performance enhancing effect is abuse. And abuse definately qualifies for anyone who is completely healthy taking large doses of any medication without sufficient need.
This is old news in the uk.so perhaps drugs with a score of 40 or more could be class A; 39 to 20 class B; 19-10 class C and 10 or under class D." This would result in tobacco being labelled a class B drug alongside cocaine. Cannabis would also just make class B, rather than class C. Ecstasy and LSD would end up in the lowest drug category, D.
For overall harm, the other drugs examined ranked as follows: crystal meth (33), cocaine (27), tobacco (26), amphetamine/speed (23), cannabis (20), GHB (18), benzodiazepines (15), ketamine (15), methadone (13), butane (10), qat (9), ecstasy (9), anabolic steroids (9), LSD (7), buprenorphine (6) and magic mushrooms (5).
alcohol scored 72 – against 55 for heroin and 54 for crack
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/nov/01/alcohol-more-harmful-than-heroin-crack
BBC.uk
Are you high or something?No my man, do you think researches are dumb like that ?
When they compare 2 drugs , they test for example 50 users in each drug category so they get a legit answer... It's not like they compare 20 alcohol users to 2 steroid users to get a BIASED answer
Those are drugs, not politics, they won't fake
And the reason why you deal with those people is because they are retarded and use steroids with no research !!!! My father is 45 years old, been juicing for 20 years and healthy like a MAD lion...
His brother, which is my uncle died at 50 because he was FAT as a mad elephant and he got heart attack because his heart couldn't handle ! and never juiced...Are you high or something?
Bet your 20 year juicing mad lion dies of heart disease.
So heart disease runs in the family and you are touting that your dad blasts something that kills lipid values?His brother, which is my uncle died at 50 because he was FAT as a mad elephant and he got heart attack because his heart couldn't handle ! and never juiced...
I'll let you know when my mad lion dies, 45 and still running like a beast
No my man, do you think researches are dumb like that ?
When they compare 2 drugs , they test for example 50 users in each drug category so they get a legit answer... It's not like they compare 20 alcohol users to 2 steroid users to get a BIASED answer
Those are drugs, not politics, they won't fake
And the reason why you deal with those people is because they are retarded and use steroids with no research !!!! My father is 45 years old, been juicing for 20 years and healthy like a MAD lion...
AAS are random. Whats good enough for the goose is not always good for the gander.And the reason why you deal with those people is because they are retarded and use steroids with no research !!!! My father is 45 years old, been juicing for 20 years and healthy like a MAD lion...
those are sad lions, remember my father is a mad lion lolAAS are random. Whats good enough for the goose is not always good for the gander.
Hdrol is punted as a mild anabolic thay doesnt aromatise, yet the internet shows a few logs where people have got gyno on cycle. They take the reccomended dose, have the all the PCT ready to go and support supps, yet they end up abusing there bodies accidently. Just one of those things.
Dosn't make them safe.those are sad lions, remember my father is a mad lion lol
but anyways, with drugs **** does happen but man to be honest, AAS are worth it ! I wasn't as confidence as I am now and thanks to AAS
We all know it and that's why we take them right ? No one is a pro here
What happens to your confidence if you cant cycle again? Or at least for a long time?those are sad lions, remember my father is a mad lion lol
but anyways, with drugs **** does happen but man to be honest, AAS are worth it ! I wasn't as confidence as I am now and thanks to AAS
We all know it and that's why we take them right ? No one is a pro here
I used to be a skinny pencil with no confidence, I started working out and juicing ! now I look like a Marker hahaha...What happens to your confidence if you cant cycle again? Or at least for a long time?
If your willing to take risks with your mental and physical health over issues like low self esteem, then in my opinion that is a catogory of addiction and possible abuse.
People use them for different reasons. Asthetics, physique enthusiastic, competitive bodybuilding, confidence, performance enhancement, medical issues, phychologial issues, AIDS, cancer. Loads of reasons.I used to be a skinny pencil with no confidence, I started working out and juicing ! now I look like a Marker hahaha...
why do people start AAS then ? because something makes them happy and it's their body
Do you think I can keep my gains if I be 235lbs using juice and then stop using juice ? 6'3'', medium built
It wasn't released in the best way lol. Alot of people take it the wrong way.Wow, that study is horrible, imo. Completely subjective to their goals.
They take count the risk of obtaining drugs i.e from a chemist or from a dealer too. They like to tout prescription drug use as safe, for reasons kind of understandable, but again misinformed and stupid in the bigger picture. But its stupid, methadone has killed more people than cannabis for sure and benzo's too. Plus either methadone and benzo's mixed with alcohol can be deadly. I think they've pulled alot of it out their arses to be honest. Believe me, people here in some of the top jobs with regards to alcohol and drugs dont have a friggin clue about either....Honestly.Benzos, methadone, MDMA, less harmful to the user than weed? Not sure how they got their figure, but I have a problem with the results. Benzos are horribly addictive, and harmful in so many other ways. I could list a litany of issues with MDMA and methadone. I haven't read the entire study, but I would like to know how they determine the harmful effects to the user. And I agree with the proportion issue.
Benzos, methadone, MDMA, less harmful to the user than weed? Not sure how they got their figure, but I have a problem with the results. Benzos are horribly addictive, and harmful in so many other ways. I could list a litany of issues with MDMA and methadone. I haven't read the entire study, but I would like to know how they determine the harmful effects to the user. And I agree with the proportion issue.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Interpret results of a raging alcoholic | Male Anti-Aging Medicine | 12 | ||
What temp for alcohol based research chemicals? | Anabolics | 12 | ||
Orals and Alcohol | Anabolics | 89 | ||
Alcohol in transdermals | Supplements | 15 | ||
Tudca and alcohol timing | Supplements | 19 |